similar to: Fax-to-Email - Legal Issues

Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure during a Asterisk/computer crash? I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but, anything running on a computer is probably going to be less reliable than most PBXs. Anybody requiring customers to acknowledge and sign any kind of

Dear Speex developer(s), We are currently in the process of evaluating speech codecs for the transmission of wideband speech (fs=16kHz) at bitrates lower than 32 kb/s. Speex is a contender for this task. Practically we would have to port Speex to a specific 16 bit DSP if we would go for this. We should be able to handle this. But we would like to ask for your opinion regarding patent

I apologize if this has been addressed before; recently I read an article in Forbes which discussed how SCO was going after companies that have been using Linux. The article made the point that the ideas behind GPL are under attack precisely because no one is making sure that the code being put into the freely avail. packages isn't owned by someone else. Here's my question: Is R

i think that if a distribution with MS WOS XP and 7 look and feel based on Gnome and Ubuntu or debian is released a lot of people would migrate. People is comdortable with what they know, even Gnome is easy to use, they like Control panel, Documents and Settings and Start vuttons from MS WOS. If program Icons should be in desktops, an start button with a control panel, My documents and so one,

Not to mention that Speex is also included in the upcoming release of Flash Player 10 (in public beta now). Jozsef -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of speex-dev-request at xiph.org Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 12:00 PM To: speex-dev at xiph.org Subject: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 49, Issue 6 Send Speex-dev mailing list

I figured I''d post here before submitting a ticket, but I''m seeing some confusing stuff when dealing with YAML now. I was using it to freeze objects in my database, and so i had some data already around to mess with. I upgraded both Ruby (1.8.3 -> 1.8.4) and Rails ( -> 1.1RC1) and this junk started. I''ve outlined the problem in two pastes, which I''ll

Does the reason Theora is relatively safe from patent infringement lawsuit have more to do with it actually not being encumbered, or is it because its use is decentralized? For example, FreeType is not patent-free, nor is Linux, yet they succeed because on the one hand, they are open source, and those who maintain them do not guarantee anything regarding patents, it is up to each individual user

On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

I posted the same question on asterisk-biz mailing list but didn't have much response. So I am posting it here now. I need a good, reliable and stable DID provider for USA, Canada and Europe. I prefer to have fixed monthly rates for incoming and outgoing calls and not per minute charges. Features I need to get with DIDs are: 1. my own caller ID and caller name on outbound calls 2. multiple

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:24:19PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > 6. Design a simple recognisable logo. > > How about a "LLVM Inside" logo like the Intel one. Another project 'TAL' > has used a smular looking logo :- > > http://www.cs.cornell.edu/talc/ It's not original, and we don't want any logo/trademark lawsuits from Intel. -- Misha Brukman

Le 25/08/2019 ? 23:07, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > I have had several people explain to me that my comments were > out-of-place and out-of-turn. When I wrote them originally I thought I > was going from experience of previous releases and thought I was being > matter of fact. In rereading I realized I was crass and grumpy. My > un-reserved apologies for that. I should have

It has just come to my notice that Redhat is planning to ship a forked version of OpenSSH. The change goes beyond the usual patches applied to RPMs in the build process: Redhat have built their own OpenSSH tarball and are using that in their source RPM instead of the official release distribution. If you are interested, have a look at the openssh-3.9p1-7.src.rpm from the Fedora development/

I found this on CrossValidated: "A medical statistician once told me, that they use SAS because if they make mistakes due to software bugs and it comes to lawsuits, SAS will recompensate them. R comes without warranty." Kjetil

Hi everybody, As the Asterisk community is getting larger and larger, I was wondering that the features which are provided in Asterisk and are programmed by the open source community under GPL, or GUIs like FreePBX which also come loaded with wonderful features and uses same Asterisk, are they anywhere violating any patent laws? Most of the features work the same way as Nortel, Avaya and other

you can always do a "restart when convenient" within asterisk, and it will do it's thing when all lines are clear.... -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Moore [mailto:moorejon@usd465.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: 911 and lawsuits and redundancy Is there a way to reload a module from the

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

Hello ! I'm very interested in btrfs development and I have general questions about it. Please accept my apologizes if they are dumb as I'm new to this area, and I just want to learn.. 1. Like the btrfs name implies (b-trees fs..) I guess that it works basically like WAFL (and ZFS), is that right ? 2. Are there any big differences between btrfs-wafl-zfs or only small ones ? 3. NetApp

Greetings; I found pdf user manual which explains a few things that might help. However, for a ubuntu flavor, the various .conf etc files seem to be in /etc/nut. But this pdf says they are in /usr/local/ups/etc, and yes indeed there are some there, with the .sample files being owned by root, and the rest are user 503, whoever he may be. Are these just a sample storage in case one needs to

On 01/18/2018 09:42 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 01/18/18 03:41, Pete Biggs wrote: >> >>> Look at: >>> >>> https://t.co/6fT61xgtGH >>> >>> Get the latest microcode.dat file from here: >>> >>> https://t.co/zPwagbeJFY >>> >>> See how to update the microcode from the links at the bottom of this