similar to: [asterisk-dev] Unstable releases lately

hi all just a quick question i have dovecot (0.99.14 yum install) running on my fc4 server to get this working, i had to downgrade from mysql 5 to fedora's mysql rpm's i really would prefer to use mysql 5, but to satisfy the dependencies, i had to go to mysql 4 now, i just want to know if there is an rpm (linux rather than specific fc4 version is fine) out there for dovecot, that i

So I'm sure many of you are using or have tried to use TrixBox. Thus far, I'm in love with it. I haven't had a single snag. Then again, I don't need to get into anything overly nitty gritty with my Asterisk box. What are your views? -- Want a free copy of "TrixBox Made Easy"? Read the contest rules

As is often the case when I tackle a new platform/language, I get the big picture very quickly (because frameworks are frameworks are frameworks) but its the nitty-gritty of the language that bogs me down... So I have some similar methods on a few of my model classes that I wanted to push into a helper. Now I reckoned that the Ruby way was to create a module and mix it in with include. However, I

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Cortes wrote: > >> Hi Chris, > > > Hi! I'm CC'ing the llvmdev list for the benefit of others. > >> Since I see you're very involved in LLVM, I need a little guidance on >> getting from C to MACH-SUIF. >> >> I've been given the task of using LLVM to translate C code to another

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > Maybe it can follow the "Delete dead loops" pass which is after > Induction Variable Simplification pass, so it will not affect existing > exitvalue rewriting optimization in Induction Variable Simplification > to find out and delete dead loops? > > Existing pass pipeline: >

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Cortes wrote: >> Can you say a little bit about MACH-SUIF? With a brief google search, I >> didn't turn up anything that described the architecture. Is it a RISC-like >> machine with 32-bit instruction words? >> > > It's another VM representation. I haven't really gotten to know the nitty > gritty of the language so

Hello security folks I (not so) recently asked for volunteers to the security documentation project. I got delightfully large number of volunteers! Thank you! Right now I have some personal (medical) issues to deal with, and I'll be out of town for the next 2 weeks. When I get back, we can move ahead at top speed. The project will have 3 parts. FAQ: This will cover any kind of basic

On Sep 24, 2008, at 9:15 AM, David Greene wrote: > >> 1. Treat these instructions as cross register class copies. The src >> and dst classes are different (VR128 and FR32) but "compatible". > > This seems reasonable. > >> 2. Model it as extract_subreg which coalescer can eliminate. >> >> #2 is conceptually correct. The problem is 128 bit XMM0 is

On Wednesday 24 September 2008 02:10, Evan Cheng wrote: > > I wrote a pattern that looks something like the above in form, but how > > do I tell the selection DAG to prefer my pattern over another that > > already exists. I can't easily just disable that other pattern > > because > > it generates Machine Instruction opcode enums that are assumed to be > >

On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:52, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Do you have specific examples in mind that would be expressible with > something more complicated that aren't handleable via an early-clobber > constraint? Not offhand, no. I'm mostly concerned about the readability of .td files. > Perhaps spelling it out more fully with "earlyclobber" rather than >

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > So Dehao and I have been dealing with some of the nitty gritty details of > > debug info with ThinLTO, specifically with Fission(Split DWARF). > > > > This applies to LTO as

Dear list, I'm tackling an empiric research problem that requires me to address a whole bunch of conceptual and/or technical details at the same time which cuts time short for all the nitty-gritty details of the "components" involved. Having said this, I'm lacking the time at the moment to deeply dive into parallel computing and HTTP requests via RCurl and I hope you can help me

All (and kevin), After flying high for a while on Rails things, I''m down to the nitty gritty of Ruby stuff. Messing with vars and printing them out on a web page. I found the controller_path in the API docs; However when putting this in a controller: @test1 = controller_class_name @test2 = controller_name @test3 = controller_path And this in a partial: Test1 <%= @test1

Gabor, Have you updated llvm2cpp to generate calls to the appropriate new constructors? Also, could you check the code in the tutorials to make sure it matches the new API? --Owen On Apr 15, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi All, > > here comes the patch for the second wave of Use class size reduction. > > I have included all the machinery that is needed, and it is

Heya, I'm trying to convince my company to use OpenSSH instead of the commercial SSH version. I need a little help: 1. What features does OpenSSH offer over commercial SSH (besides being free and open source of course)? 2. Our lawyers want details on the licensing / patents stuff. I have the high level details from the OpenSSH page. I need the nitty gritty like RSA patent# and

I've made a large update to the introduction to compressed audio. I completely rewrote the first section, which I wasn't happy with. It now features two diagrams (worth 1000 words each!), and is broken up into a couple of sections. http://cs.leander.isd.tenet.edu/~mitchell/vorbis_intro.html I have also continued to tweak other sections based on feedback from email and this forum.

I've made a large update to the introduction to compressed audio. I completely rewrote the first section, which I wasn't happy with. It now features two diagrams (worth 1000 words each!), and is broken up into a couple of sections. http://cs.leander.isd.tenet.edu/~mitchell/vorbis_intro.html I have also continued to tweak other sections based on feedback from email and this forum.

> Unfortunately I had to introduce a new GlobalVariable::Create > mechanism (I hoped to have nailed all in wave 1, but life is cruel). > I will submit scripts for the easy conversion of external projects > like the last time. One request is to explicity explain the new mechanism so people don't have to read the diffs or extrapolate from the conversion scripts. Please send a

Hi Gabor, Can you provide performance data for this? I'd like to know what affect these changes have on compile time. Thanks, Dan On Apr 15, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi All, > > here comes the patch for the second wave of Use class size reduction. > > I have included all the machinery that is needed, and it is > *active*. The User* inside of Use is even

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Cortes wrote: > >>> Can you say a little bit about MACH-SUIF? With a brief google >>> search, I didn't turn up anything that described the architecture. >>> Is it a RISC-like machine with 32-bit instruction words? >>> >> >> It's another VM representation. I haven't really gotten