similar to: sangoma asterisk patches

Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with that patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause unexpected behavior when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't

# moving to -users as this belongs there. It is a nice idea to run several Asterisk processes simultenously, it will defineately help with multithreading. However I would suggest trying less instances - that would perhaps give greater benefit, as Asterisk has it's own threading. For example 8 instances of Asterisk / 4 instances.. However, in this case - if You go for splitting everything up,

Hi, Recommending to go Digium because of an OpenBSD issue with the Sangoma A104D is quite funny to say the least since neither is the TE407P supported in BSD by Digium. So the recommendation is useless to the person who originally requested for a comparison between the two products. If someone wanted to send back the A104D, he could have taken advantage of Sangoma's 30 day money back

Hi, folks! Sangoma has an informal user survey up on their home page (at http://www.sangoma.com) asking if people would use their A500 card for North American BRI, if it were supported. I encourage anyone with an interest in voice BRI in North America to vote; this information will be used for deciding whether to make the investment in developing a National ISDN driver layer for it. Benefits to

Does anyone know if the Sangoma A101 supports DS4 and/or RBS ! Shame on me for not knowing the answer, but I don't, and I can't find any mention of it on Sangoma's website. Cory Andrews Purchasing Manager ++++++++++++++++++ VOIPSupply.com A Division of b2 Technologies 454 Sonwil Drive Buffalo, NY 14225 ++++++++++++++++++++ direct - 716.250.3402 mobile - 716.907.4054 email -

such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy. Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ? That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP platform too specific ? what is the official policy ? README starts with

Saw an ad in the latest Linux Journal for Sangoma's FXO/FXS analog cards. it was part of an ad for a reseller. I can't find anything on the resellers site or Sangoma's site either. Did the ad jump the gun or someting? Is this for real? Paul -- Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC paul@dugas.cc phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park

Can you help me, how to update the old sangoma driver? I downloaded the last driver from sangoma's web. kind regards, Szolke

Today, sessions 320-321 of the VoIP Users Conference will take place at the usual time, 12 Noon Eastern [ http://vuc.me/next for local times ] We'll be talking to Sangoma's Frederic Dickey about NetBorder 4.0. You can download or watch his accompanying slide presentation here: http://vuc.li/Sangoma-2011 Next, Pascal Dor?, mVoIP chief over at Media5 Corporation will talk about the

static void senddialevent(struct ast_channel *src, struct ast_channel *dst) { manager_event(EVENT_FLAG_CALL, "Dial", "Source: %s\r\n" "Destination: %s\r\n" "CallerID: %s\r\n" "CallerIDName: %s\r\n" "SrcUniqueID: %s\r\n" "DestUniqueID: %s\r\n" "CDRUserfield: %s\r\n", src->name,

Hi folks Xorcom Rapid 1.0 is avilable for download Q: 1.0? A: Sure, better than 0.9.1: * Asterisk 1.0.5 * Base packages upgraded * Built with SpanDSP support * Improved Zaptel detection * ast-cmd with some useful command-line abilities provided * ssh installed by default * putty.exe is included on the CD * music-on-hold files removed due to potential licensing issues

About the IVR, are u using Asterisk? Regards Bilal > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:23:41 +0200 > From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Credit Card processing > machines > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > Message-ID: <20090218102341.GD21440 at xorcom.com> >

Hi I put a snapshot of our current packages updates.xorcom.com . They are available from the deb source deb http://updates.xorcom.com/test sarge main (this is s/rapid/test/ of the name of the source of the stable version) Changes include: * Fixed and simplified zaptel detection * Support for spandsp: compiled but not yet tested * IAX extensions * Mail server configuration * The script

Dear List; Thanks alot for the help. But how can I let the second dial tone (after pressing the extension to select that FXO port) to be difference than normal dial tone? Regards Bilal Ghayad -------------------------- Correction, on FXO port not FXS, second, read his email first: "Also, how it will be possible to assign an dedicated line (connected to FXO) to an button on the Polycom IP

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Hi On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:46:30AM -0300, Caciano Machado wrote: > I'm receiving a lot of warning messages from my Asterisk > 1.2.5/chan_oh323 every time

Dear Folks, Anyone knows if Sangoma supports or going to provide support for battery removal detection on FXO lines?? As Tzafrir said earlier DAHDI supports it, which is a very nice feature but what about Sangoma? Regards. -- M. Shokuie Nia. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Okay, i'll move my discuss to asterisk-users. Thank you. On 1/17/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0800, ??? wrote: > > Jonson Player wrote: > > > Hello, I intend to buy a FXO/FXS device from Linksys. > > > I'm thinking about SPA3102. What you guys thik about it. > > > Is ok, is

Same question for asterisk-users as well: ----- Forwarded message from Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> ----- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:14:04 +0200 From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Short version: it's now time to remove. Anybody actually uses latest DAHDI with RHEL4? See inline, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:42:39PM

, address 2 Dec 30 21:42:08 wedekindpbx1 kernel: [ 3746.344611] ERR-xpp_usb: XBUS-00: x= usb_listen: usb_submit_urb failed: -19 Dec 30 21:42:08 wedekindpbx1 kernel: [ 3746.353325] INFO-xpp: XBUS-00: [] D= isconnecting Dec 30 21:42:08 wedekindpbx1 kernel: [ 3746.353373] Zaptel: Master changed = to XBUS-00/XPD-01 Dec 30 21:42:08 wedekindpbx1 kernel: [ 3746.353382] Zaptel: Master changed = to

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Steve Casto wrote: > > https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17529 > Thanks Tzafrir: > Unclear on how to apply patch, here is what I get: > [root at localhost asterisk-1.4.32]# patch -p1 < ../bug17529.diff.txt > can't find file to patch at input line 5 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? > The text