similar to: AEX800 (TDM800 Express) - not detected

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "AEX800 (TDM800 Express) - not detected"

2010 Sep 08
2
Problem with new AEX800 card dying because of interrupt problems
Hello I purchased an AEX800 card to replace the ageing cheap channel bank/T1 card solution a few months ago, assuming that it would be a more robust solution for my small scale phone system. However, it appears to be anything but that. Originally implemented as a XEN dom-u virtual machine on a large server class machine, using PCI passthrough to pass the AEX800 and a small older TDM400, then
2010 Dec 20
4
dahdi issue on digium AEX800
Hi All, I have installed asterisk 1.6.2.8 Dahdi: 2.4.0 Digium card: Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX800 8-port analog card I have configured this card properly and it is working for calls too, But there is issue of one way audio on this outbound routes only, My voice is going to outside pstn number but i am not able to get their audio, I have disabled firewall, selinux is also off. If I am applying
2007 Aug 26
1
TDM400 and TDM800 fxo stop answering
Hi, I have two asterisk with the Digium TDM400 installed on the first and the TDM800 installed on the second. Both systems are linux Debian 4.0 whith kernel 2.6.18 and asterisk 1.2.24. Often the cards stop answering calls, and I can't make or receive calls; I need to reboot the system or manually reload the zaptel modules to restore it. I've tried zaptel versions 1.2.18, 1.2.19 and 1.2.20
2007 Aug 04
0
zttool says tdm800 is OK, but it won't recieve calls.
I have a TDM800 that is installed and working. (TDM800 + 2 X QUAD FXO). Zttool says it is configured, ok, and there are no issues. Ztcfg -vvv shows that all the channels are configured. Zap show channels in the CLI show all 8 channels configured as they are supposed to be. When I plug in a pots line from the telco and make a call to that line, asterisk does not respond. (No Starting
2007 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.0 / GCC 3.4
Hi there, Is it possible to use GCC 3.4 with LLVM 2.0? I tried to compile GCC 3.4 with LLVM 2.0 and get following error message: /scratch/spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/build/gcc/xgcc -B/ scratch/spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/build/gcc/ -B/scratch/ spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/install/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ - B/scratch/spa_llvm-2.0/llvm-gcc3.4-1.9.source/install/i386-pc-
2008 Aug 12
0
configure for ARM Linux
Hi, all, Samba version 3.2.1 tar ball is downloaded. Next, I'm facing how to configure it for ARM Linux, but it's not so smooth for me. : ( The following is my environment information: 1. Development environment : Linux PC 2. Cross compiler : scratchbox/compilers/arm-gcc3.4-uclibc0.9.28 3. Configure options : (almost of them are googled) $ ./configure --without-krb5
2011 May 03
2
Multiple cards using same IRQ - getting IRQ errors and hissing
I am running Asterisk 1.16.2.13, dahdi 2.4.0 and libpri 1.4.11.4 on an HP ML110 G6 using Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS. I have two Digium TE121 single T1 port cards and a Digium AEX800 8-port FXS card. All PCI Express cards. Co-workers are hearing hissing sounds on some calls, and I am getting IRQ errors when running "dahdi show status". I see that sharing IRQs for Digium cards isn't
2007 May 28
2
Multiple TDM400p cards in one machine -- no longer an issue?
Hi all, Years ago, I was pretty sure attempting to use two TDM400p cards in one machine was recommended against by Digium ... probably because the cards couldn't hack it, and/or interrupt problems etc I have seen some posts recently that seem to indicate it is in fact possible these days thanks to some updated firmware perhaps? ..... I just need to have two in the server because the 4 ports
2010 May 24
4
convert zaptel to dahdi?
I am trying to get a zaptel install converted to dahdi. I can get dahdi installed, and the pseudo device even shows up; however, dahdi show channels shows me nothing. There is a TE122 and a TDM800 in there, and neither show up. dahdi show status shows both cards, and dahdi tools show that the cards are there, working, and have no alarms. What am I missing? Michael Munger, dCAP, MCPS, MCNPS,
2007 Apr 02
1
Yeastar Cards
I am in the process of buying a TDM800 card from Yeastar ( http://www.yeastar.com/products.asp?TypeName=TDM800%20PCI%20Card&cTypeName=1 ) Any one has tested this cards? How reliable are them? I am specially interested in the FXO/FXS module. -- Gustavo Felisberto (HumpBack) Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/ ------------ It's most certainly GNU/Linux,
2009 Mar 04
1
Question on phone line "pass through"
Hi all, I have a TDM2400 full of FXS cards and a TDM800 full of FXO cards. If I have a fax machine on the FXS port dialing out through asterisk on the TDM800 FXO, should I be expecting any problems? Or should this just work as expected? (ie, flawlessly with the asterisk box essentially transparent to the whole operation). I am doing it this way to allow many faxes and modems to share a dial
2011 May 28
2
dtmf Caller-id detection before first ring
Hi dears, I am from saudi arabia and using asterisk 1.6.2.13,Dahdi-2.3.0 and Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX800 8-port analog card (PCI-Express) . I am facing problem with detecting caller id before first ring.I recorded the dahdi channel using dahdi_monitor command. Where I am able to see and hear caller-id dtmf tones. Pl tell me the procedure to upload recorded file if you needed. Something I want
2010 Apr 06
2
polarity reverse
Hi, I have a problem with polarity reverse this my dahdi config [channels] context=default usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes relaxdtmf=yes rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1
2008 May 20
7
Busy out a zap channel?
Is there a way to busy out a Zap channel? I have a customer who is having problems with a line connected to a TDM800 card and we would like to busy out that line. Since that line is the head of the hunt group I cannot simply disable that channel, I need to busy the line so calls will come over the other lines. -- ?Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de M?xico S.A. de C.V. Carlos Ch?vez Prats Director
2008 Feb 01
2
It's about time! -- Digium PCI-Express Cards
Just noticed this today: Digium TE220B Dual Span T1/E1 PCI Express Card with Octasic DSP-based Echo Cancellation Module<http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=3352> It's about time Digium got on the ball and made PCI-e cards. What are people's experiences with this card? Anyone know if there are plans for a PCI-e analog card for FXO use? -------------- next part
2006 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Actually, my request for more info in the "Getting Started" had some > hidden questions, as I don't know the answer to them :) So to be a > little more clear, here are the two I had: > > Does the gcc4 no longer need the "fixheaders" script that the gcc3.4 > frontends uses? > > Is it possible to install both the gcc4 and
2010 Mar 05
4
Deadlock in Asterisk 1.4.29.1
Hello, I have previously open a topic on the mailing list about deadlocking on Asterisk 1.2.35. After upgrading to 1.4.29.1 we still experienced the same problem : Mar 5 12:05:56] DEBUG[8647] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for channel '0xb7689840' [Mar 5 12:06:41] DEBUG[7130] channel.c: Avoiding deadlock for channel '0xb7c04788' [Mar 5 12:06:41] DEBUG[7130]
2006 Aug 25
4
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Chris Lattner wrote: > Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested > text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that the people who > usually end up writing the FAQ's already know all the answers, so it's > hard for us to see things from fresh perspectives sometimes :) > > -Chris > Actually, my request for more info in the
2006 Aug 23
2
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
Hello, It looks like the "Getting Started" is missing some info about the gcc 4.0 frontend. Since it doesn't follow the setup of the cfrontend/gcc3.4 package, a couple sections describing the front end don't cover the gcc4 package. Here are the couple things I'd wish could be fleshed out a bit more: Under "Getting Started Quickly (A Summary)", it'd be nice
2006 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] updating the "Getting Started" page with more info about the gcc4 frontend
There should also be a large notice in 40 point font and bold that says, "gcc4 does not produce byte code by default: you must use the -emit-llvm flag to get LLVM byte code." Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like the "Getting Started" is missing some info about the gcc > 4.0 frontend. Since it doesn't follow the setup of the cfrontend/gcc3.4 >