similar to: Fwd: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Fwd: [asterisk-dev] chan_h323 and chan_oh323 compatibilities"

2009 Mar 28
0
oh323 to h323
Hi Debian has a package for chan_oh323 (the original, external h323). It is not maintaind for quite some time AFAIK and also AFAIK offers no real atvantages over chan_h323. So I'd like to remove it. Before I do that, I have some questions, as I'm not familiar with H.323 channels: 1. Are there any useful features oh323 supports that h323 doesn't? That the version of h323 in 1.4.21
2009 Jul 14
0
Help in oh323 Gatekeeper + does not know what to do when bridging the call
Actually I am facing a problem with H.323 (the standard and the ooh323) with Asterisk vesion 1.4.25 and I discover the following: 1) Using the standard h323 that come with Asterisk: The chan_h323.so it is not existed in the /usr/lib/asterisk/modules after doing the compilation and installation for (pwlib, openh323, /chanels/h323, asterisk), although make menuselect was done and the h323 channel
2004 Dec 17
1
Forcing E.164ID with chan_h323 & or chan_oh323
I am trying to figure out the correct way to send my E.164 ID with chan_h323 and or chan_oh323 as my H323 provider requires this in the format of 'account-pin'. With chan_oh323 I have been able to register with the gatekeeper and can recieve incomming calls, but outgoing calls do not work. With chan_h323, I can call H323 clients (netmeeting, ATAs etc) but cannot place a call through my
2003 May 21
0
to jerjer or not to, i.e. not the question was ( chan_oh323.so: Segmentation Fault)
a) jerjers been doing a lot commendable work for * b) support is not mandatory, and i agree with royk it should not be withheld based on political viewpoints, that's pointlessly draconian c) choice is always good, so people should have the option of oh323 or h323, let them decide, and not limit them, unless astmaster chooses to limit them, and that too based on valid points d) jerjer gave a
2003 Aug 17
1
Chan_h323 one way audio
Hi, I have been using chan_oh323 with a latency issue even on the same network. I am now trying chan_h323 and can only get one way audio. I am testing using SJPhone -> SJPhone, and also SJPhone -> 7960 (SIP). Any ideas? Must be something obvious that I am missing? Thanks. Regards, Steven Thomas
2003 Jul 22
2
No callerid on outgoing call over chan_h323
Hi, Has anybody managed to get callerid properly set on a call from local to asterisk SIP endpoint through h323-pstn gateway to a regular phone. I'm using ata186 as SIP endpoint. It has 12125551234 assigned to it. When I place a call to pstn I'm not receiving 12125551234 as the clid, but a number assigned to PRI channel by phone company. It worked with chan_oh323, but there were other
2003 Jun 10
4
chan_h323 + openh323 CVS = no go?
Hi, trying to build the h323 channel driver that comes with asterisk works fine, but only as long as I use openh323-1.11.7. Unfortunately, that setup seems to have a bug which misguides one of the audio streams. (So while * can "hear" me, the phone remains silent.) I suppose that bug is fixed at least in openh323 CVS. At least, I got things mostly working using the external
2003 May 23
2
Please remove H.323 from Asterisk (was H.323 support is distrubuted with Asterisk (was Re: chan_oh323.so: Segmentation Fault))
Sheesh. I only joined here a few days ago and already there's a flame war. Look, to remove your name from the list is easy. It tells you where to go to manage your subscription down there at the bottom. If you want another mailing list, why not go to yahoo!! or topica and set one up, or set one up yourself. It ain't rocket science with mailman. Even an idiot like me has managed it.
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
such file or directory" on pure-IP platform in which I installed asterisk-libpri-dahdi trilogy. Maybe, it's me while following README instructions, maybe README instructions could be improved or maybe it's wrongly labeled messages ? That's why I told myself : I'm waiting too much from doc ? is a pure-IP platform too specific ? what is the official policy ? README starts with
2007 Mar 13
1
RE: In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two H323 channels?
Hi Users, Administrators and Pavel Jezek, You prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree and it's of course that use channels by tree is very good. But in 1.2.x, the chan_h323 is very simple and the chan_oh323 is so bad. And I work with chan_ooh323, that it's too from Digium and work good! And I am Studing one possible change to Asterisk 1.4.x , but in 1.4.x the oh323 channel don't have more,
2005 Feb 06
0
Xorcom Rapid 1.0 released
Hi folks Xorcom Rapid 1.0 is avilable for download Q: 1.0? A: Sure, better than 0.9.1: * Asterisk 1.0.5 * Base packages upgraded * Built with SpanDSP support * Improved Zaptel detection * ast-cmd with some useful command-line abilities provided * ssh installed by default * putty.exe is included on the CD * music-on-hold files removed due to potential licensing issues
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
static void senddialevent(struct ast_channel *src, struct ast_channel *dst) { manager_event(EVENT_FLAG_CALL, "Dial", "Source: %s\r\n" "Destination: %s\r\n" "CallerID: %s\r\n" "CallerIDName: %s\r\n" "SrcUniqueID: %s\r\n" "DestUniqueID: %s\r\n" "CDRUserfield: %s\r\n", src->name,
2003 May 26
3
chan_h323 and extensions.conf
Hi all, I try to ask helps again about chan_h323 extensions. I define this in h323.conf: [general] port = 1720 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 allow=gsm allow=ulaw gatekeeper = DISABLE context=default [gm1] type=friend host=192.168.1.20 context=default [gm2] type=friend host=192.168.1.25 context=default and I have in extensions.conf : [demo]
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
About the IVR, are u using Asterisk? Regards Bilal > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:23:41 +0200 > From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Credit Card processing > machines > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > Message-ID: <20090218102341.GD21440 at xorcom.com> >
2007 Oct 02
0
Selecting a specific line from Zap/g And secondary dial tone
Dear List; Thanks alot for the help. But how can I let the second dial tone (after pressing the extension to select that FXO port) to be difference than normal dial tone? Regards Bilal Ghayad -------------------------- Correction, on FXO port not FXS, second, read his email first: "Also, how it will be possible to assign an dedicated line (connected to FXO) to an button on the Polycom IP
2007 Jan 17
0
Re: [asterisk-dev] Question about FXO/FXS device.
Okay, i'll move my discuss to asterisk-users. Thank you. On 1/17/07, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:39:03PM +0800, ??? wrote: > > Jonson Player wrote: > > > Hello, I intend to buy a FXO/FXS device from Linksys. > > > I'm thinking about SPA3102. What you guys thik about it. > > > Is ok, is
2012 Mar 08
0
[tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com: Re: [asterisk-dev] Proposal for DAHDI-trunk: deprecate old kernels]
Same question for asterisk-users as well: ----- Forwarded message from Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> ----- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:14:04 +0200 From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com Short version: it's now time to remove. Anybody actually uses latest DAHDI with RHEL4? See inline, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:42:39PM
2009 Jul 20
0
No subject
one under my default context at extention.conf. And what is [pbx_config]? Thanks Eyal -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:05 PM To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Is there a default dial plan that is not in
2010 Jul 16
0
beeping during calls
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Steve Casto wrote: > > https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17529 > Thanks Tzafrir: > Unclear on how to apply patch, here is what I get: > [root at localhost asterisk-1.4.32]# patch -p1 < ../bug17529.diff.txt > can't find file to patch at input line 5 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? > The text
2004 Sep 07
0
chan_h323: remote ip address -> context
Hi, I'm looking for a mean in chan_h323 to jump to a specific context dependent on the remote ip address. E.g. an argument, let's tell it "ignore_h323_name", in h323.conf users like this: [BillyBob] ignore_h323_name=yes type=user host=1.2.3.4 context=path1 in a way, every incoming call from ip 1.2.3.4 will fit this user, not only when the H323-name is BillyBob. Or a variable