Thiago Maluf
2007-Mar-13 13:10 UTC
[asterisk-users] RE: In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two H323 channels?
Hi Users, Administrators and Pavel Jezek,
You prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree and it's of course that use channels
by tree is very good.
But in 1.2.x, the chan_h323 is very simple and the chan_oh323 is so bad.
And I work with chan_ooh323, that it's too from Digium and work good!
And I am Studing one possible change to Asterisk 1.4.x , but in 1.4.x the
oh323 channel don't have more, and studing the chan_h323, it's the old
chan_oh323
I not wanna work with add_ons but in Asterisk 1.4.x, will I have work?
Somebody confirm it, have the same opinion. Or this new chan_h323 work fine
without the problems that had the H323 or OH323 channels.
Thanks in Advanced.
Thiago Maluf Resende.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:57:42 +0100
From: Pavel Jezek <pavel.jezek@i.cz>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two
H323 Channels
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <45F56A66.9020800@i.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
as I know, ooh323 is external project from objective systems,
anyway, for 1.4 I prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree.
Thiago Maluf wrote:> Now, the H323 Channels is updated and your bugs fixed.
> But Digium still develop your OOH323 Channel. My question is why?
> What is the better in Asterisk 1.4.x.? I know that in Asterisk 1.2.x
> OOH323 is very better than H323 or OH323.
> Thanks in advanced.
> Thiago.
>
> --
> ------------------------------
----------------------------------> THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
> Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
> Tel: +55 21 86042100
> e-mail: malufrj@gmail.com <mailto:malufrj@gmail.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
<http://easynews.com/>--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
Tel: +55 21 86042100
e-mail: malufrj@gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070313/cb3e2fff/attachment.htm
Pavel Jezek
2007-Mar-13 14:11 UTC
[asterisk-users] RE: In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two H323 channels?
for 1.4 you have only two choices chan_h323 and chan_ooh323, chan_oh323 from inaccessible networks, is death project, more than year unmaintained, I'm using chan_h323 both from 1.2 and 1.4 without problems (opposite site to chan_h323 is ci$co gateway or callmanager) also, chan_ooh323 isn't maintained as good as chan_h323, if you will have some issues with chan_h323, you can report through digium bugtrack and reply come quite quickly, not so with chan_ooh323 thats my reasons, why I can recommend original chan_h323. PJ Thiago Maluf wrote:> Hi Users, Administrators and Pavel Jezek, > You prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree and it's of course that use > channels by tree is very good. > But in 1.2.x, the chan_h323 is very simple and the chan_oh323 is so bad. > And I work with chan_ooh323, that it's too from Digium and work good! > And I am Studing one possible change to Asterisk 1.4.x , but in 1.4.x > the oh323 channel don't have more, and studing the chan_h323, it's the > old chan_oh323 > I not wanna work with add_ons but in Asterisk 1.4.x, will I have work? > Somebody confirm it, have the same opinion. Or this new chan_h323 work > fine without the problems that had the H323 or OH323 channels. > Thanks in Advanced. > Thiago Maluf Resende. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:57:42 +0100 > From: Pavel Jezek < pavel.jezek@i.cz <mailto:pavel.jezek@i.cz>> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two > H323 Channels > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > < asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > <mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>> > Message-ID: <45F56A66.9020800@i.cz <mailto:45F56A66.9020800@i.cz>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > as I know, ooh323 is external project from objective systems, > anyway, for 1.4 I prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree. > > > > Thiago Maluf wrote: > > Now, the H323 Channels is updated and your bugs fixed. > > But Digium still develop your OOH323 Channel. My question is why? > > What is the better in Asterisk 1.4.x.? I know that in Asterisk 1.2.x > > OOH323 is very better than H323 or OH323. > > Thanks in advanced. > > Thiago. > > > > -- > > ------------------------------ > ---------------------------------- > > THIAGO MALUF RESENDE > > Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer) > > Tel: +55 21 86042100 > > e-mail: malufrj@gmail.com <mailto:malufrj@gmail.com> <mailto: > malufrj@gmail.com <mailto:malufrj@gmail.com>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com > <http://easynews.com/> -- > > > > asterisk-users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > THIAGO MALUF RESENDE > Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer) > Tel: +55 21 86042100 > e-mail: malufrj@gmail.com <mailto:malufrj@gmail.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >