similar to: Inexpensive Layer 3 Switch?

Hi, I'm looking for opinions on the "best value" router to use for home offices. It should work for a scenario in which there are 3 computers and 2 SIP phones, handling QoS so that the phones always have higher priority traffic than the PCs. (and not rely on the phones to do the QoS because some PCs may not be connected to the phones). QoS could be based on destination and source

Hello: I have read that music on hold requires a timing source (which I never had to worry about previously since the server had zaptel hardware in it)...now I'm configuring a server in a colo which has no zaptel hardware. If I use the dialplan to run MusicOnHold(), I do get the music upon dialling that extension, but if I try to use the hold button on either a 7960 or X-Lite I get

Since upgrading to 7.2, I've noticed a random problem where I dial a number and hear all the correct tones in the handset, but the display won't show all the numbers I dialed. So you sit there waiting for the dialplan to kick the call off (b/c you heard the proper amount of tones played and think it's all good) but the phone is just sitting there b/c it somehow "missed"

> I too contacted CDW about the $9.37 Cisco support > contract. But because I did not buy my phone from them I was > not allowed to purchase it. The vendor I bought the phone > from does not provide them. What are the "magic words" to > get CDW to sell it to you? With all of this hassle I highly > doubt that I will buy more Cisco phones anyway. After >

Hi, The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change include : - Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP with the current bridge and vlan code. - Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged vlan can

Can anyone help me to understand what the significance of this output is? May 17 10:50:23 DEBUG[2030]: Didn't get a frame from channel: SIP/105-1ae4 May 17 10:50:23 DEBUG[2030]: Bridge stops bridging channels SIP/105-1ae4 and SIP/outbound-7dc3 I searched for these phrases but am coming up short on what they really mean. I'm trying to investigate problems we are having with two

Hello everyone, I playing around with ENUM and have configured * to query a few sources for testing purposes (fierymoon, e164.arpa, e164.org). I'd like to know if there is a way to query these servers manually (ie outside of asterisk via nslookup or equivalent) to find out if particular exchanges are listed with wildcards, so as to terminate calls to those prefixes (I'm not trying to

Hello everyone.... Searching the archives and google always comes up with entries regarding the "dyn" dns option in the 7960, but I can't find answers to my specific question.... My 7960 is connected via cable modem and is NAT'ed (everything is working fine). On the 7960 under SIP configuration\NAT Address I have the public IP of my cable connection. Comcast gives me a

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

Does anyone know if the 7912G (which the wiki says can do either sccp or sip) uses the 7940/60 sip firmware? I ask this because the only firmware I can seem to find on TAC for the 7912G is sccp, no sip...if it takes it's own firmware and doesn't use 7940/60 firmware, can someone point me to the right location for it? Thanks, Marty Mastera M3 Resources marty@m3resources.com Phone:

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

We are having an issue with the SPA962/932 combo where the phone and the sidecar will reboot unexpectedly ? could be onhook, could be on a call, doesn?t seem to matter. I read that certain early firmware revisions could cause this so I?m running what was a week ago the newest available (5.1.18). A call to Linksys support suggested that I ensure that the phones are using a recent firmware version

Hello. I''m trying to use vlan in domU, but have something strange: I created bridge on eth0. This interface was configured as trunk with vlan 300, 301. I use this bridge in my domU, and I can see tagged packets when run tcpdump in domU. Also I created interface on domU to work with vlan 300. On this interface I see untagged packets in vlan300. And everything looks fine. But when

Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at

On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? > Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan. A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but

Just curious, if I have my Polycom IP 550 phone VLAN tag 30, will the packets I send from my PC(on the PC port of the phone) have the same VLAN tag? THe PC is sending untagged packets. This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and

Thank you everyone. OK, the mystery deepens, I guess. The machine does need to support several VLAN's, it is currently on a trunkport (8021q encapsulated), it made it into the ARP table - which I specifically tested for by physically unplugging the table, clearing the ARP table and plugging it back in. The ARP table currently looks like this: hq#show arp Protocol Address Age (min)

Hello all, I have a machine running Centos 6.6 connected to a port on a Cisco Catalyst 3750 series switch. That port is part of VLAN 48. I have VLAN 48 on the CentOS machine too. The IP network on VLAN 48 is 192.168.48.0/255.255.255.0. The address on the CentOS side is 192.168.48.101, the address on the Linux end ought to be 192.168.48.100. When I only bring up eth0.48 VLAN device with the

Hello, When I listen to a voicemail message, the recorded message is played back at extremely low volume. All the supporting prompts are at the correct volume, it's just the incoming recorded message that is played back almost inaudibly quiet. There's no problem with the volume during normal converstaions so I'm thinking this must be specific to the Voicemail application. I've

I''m trying to implement simple untagged vlans on our switch and have misconfigured something.. ISP gw is on the default vlan1 (untagged) Router eth1 is setup on the switch with default vlan1 and member of vlan4. eth0 is default vlan4 which connects to the clients that are all default members of vlan4 eth0 is x.x.x.86/28 This is what clients are connecting to as their gw.. (no