similar to: Anyone tried using a SCCP service provider>

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Anyone tried using a SCCP service provider>"

2007 Jun 11
0
Asterisk as an SCCP client
Hi all, Has anyone tried using Asterisk as an SCCP client? My company has just signed up a 2 year agreement with M5 (fools!!) but are having intellectual issues with things like intra office phone calls and voice mail etc. They suddenly realized after M5 was installed that ALL their calls go out to the Internet and back and they don't like it. M5 uses SCCP. Could an Asterisk box be
2005 Oct 11
2
Re: [Chan-sccp-users] Need help with hint and callgroup
I don't think that will fix my problem. The hints on the individual user extensions (101, 102, 103 and 104 below) are working just fine. sccp.conf example of 1 user: [devices] type = 7970 description = User1 tzoffset = -6 autologin = 101,401 speeddial = 102,User2,102@wct-internal speeddial = 103,User3,103@wct-internal speeddial = 104,User4,104@wct-internal device => SEP000F90CEF9D3
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] SCCP
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: >>> For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values >>> calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization into an >>> analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can >>> use its analysis results? >> >> SCCP is already split into an SCCPSolver class
2007 Apr 26
1
Cisco 7920 sccp
I am trying to register cisco 7920 to asterisk using sccp since to sip firmware upgrade to it ,but its ends with failed registration.Can you please send me a sample for sccp.conf configuring cisco 7902. Thanks -- SCCP: Accepted connection from 192.168.5.163 -- SCCP: Using ip 192.168.5.228 -- SCCP: Accepted connection from 192.168.5.163 -- SCCP: Using ip 192.168.5.228
2006 Apr 12
1
Cisco 7960 won't dial (sccp)
I'm trying to setup a couple of Cisco 7960's in asterisk. I have asterisk working fine for sip clients, and can call the 7960's just fine, but I can't seem to dial out on them. As soon as I enter the first digit, the phone attempts to dial it without waiting for the rest. I've changed timeout settings, etc but can't seem to get it to work. Any ideas? Asterisk
2006 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] SCCP
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >>>> For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values >>>> calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization >>>> into an >>>> analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can >>>> use its analysis results?
2006 Mar 16
0
SCCP problem with ATA188, Asterisk@home and chan_sccp
Hi, This is a message I already posted on the chan_sccp mailing list, but since this list has a lot of active members, I'm hoping someone might be able to help (And my problem is * related, so I guess it's ok if I post it here also ;) ). I'm trying to get SCCP ATA188s to run with Asterisk. The Asterisk box uses the latest Asterisk@Home image (Version 2.6). I have compiled and
2006 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] SCCP
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >> For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values >> calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization into an >> analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can >> use its analysis results? > > SCCP is already split into an SCCPSolver
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] SCCP
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> You could do that, but SCCPSolver isn't really useful to mainline LLVM >> for anything other than SCCP and IPSCCP, so we don't need it in a public >> header. Out of curiosity, what are you looking to use the latice values >> for? Why not just run SCCP and then look at the transformed code? > > I was planning to
2006 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] SCCP
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >>> Then just run the SCCP pass, and check to see if any operands satisfy >>> the predicate "isa<UndefValue>(V)". LLVM explicitly represents >>> undefined values. >> >> >> I have a case where it doesn't, but perhaps the SCCP pass isn't to blame: >>
2007 Apr 10
6
Help w/ Asterisk Cisco IP phone and SCCP
I have a new asterisk installation (1.4.2) that is working fine with SIP. Now I'm trying to add 2 cisco ip phones (7960) running SCCP (latest chan_sccp). I have the phones booted, and the tftp directory all setup, etc. But the phones do not quite work right. When I lift the handset I only get a dial-tone 1 out of 5 or so times I try, though hitting the speaker button works. I can dial
2004 Apr 08
2
i'm looking for reference guide for Skinny SCCP
Hi all, I'm writing my graduation theses : analysis VO-IP protocols , and I cannot find any documents about Cisko Skinny Client Control Protocol. I have Cisco CallManager and some IP-phone and I'm sniffing traffic between that, but I don't understand, how this protocol works. Clearly i'm looking for description of SCCP commands and explanation some basic SCCP scenarios or what
2017 May 19
0
AST-2017-004: Memory exhaustion on short SCCP packets
Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2017-004 Product Asterisk Summary Memory exhaustion on short SCCP packets Nature of Advisory Denial of Service Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] SCCP
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> Then just run the SCCP pass, and check to see if any operands satisfy >> the predicate "isa<UndefValue>(V)". LLVM explicitly represents >> undefined values. > > I have a case where it doesn't, but perhaps the SCCP pass isn't to blame: > > extern void write_char(int); > > const char foo[4] =
2006 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] SCCP
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Nick Lewycky wrote: > For an analysis pass, I'm interested in reading the lattice values > calculated by SCCP. Should I split the current SCCP optimization into an > analysis piece and the optimization that depends on it, so that I can > use its analysis results? SCCP is already split into an SCCPSolver class that is used by the SCCP and IPSCCP classes. You
2013 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] sccp pass with opt
This compiler does not have mem-SSA, as far as I know, only few pass can propagate value along memory. You need to promote those local variable into register first before sccp is invoked. e.g1. opt a.ll -basicaa -gvn -sccp -S eg.2. opt a.ll -sroa -sccp -S On 4/16/13 12:37 PM, Niko Zarzani wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to see how single llvm optimizations work by running them
2011 Jun 07
0
sccp problem
Dear I installed chan-sccp-b v3 on a powerful virtual machine, with 4 cpu cores and 16GB RAM(enabled in kernel by PAE) about 1,200+ clients are going to register in this machine. all data of clients are saved in ORACLE. The asterisk (1.6.2.18) connected to the database throw odbc(unixodbc). all logging are disabled( verbose, debug and sccp debug) . the asterisk was crashed every few minutes. here
2008 Oct 09
1
Cisco 7960 sccp, Skinny and 1.4
Hi All, I'm thinking of creating a new asterisk server using the latest 1.4 stable release to replace my ageing Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r7231 (its been a while!). My only concern - my phones are Cisco 7960's (with sccp firmware 7.2 loaded) and to support them better, I remember compiling in a skinny(?) driver to replace the (from what I could tell) basic in built sccp support. After
2016 Dec 31
0
SCCP is not always correct in presence of undef (+ proposed fix)
Hi, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 9:04 PM Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> Looking at the original bug, it seems like a straightforward >> undef-propagation bug to me -- SCCP was folding "or undef, constant"
2004 Nov 30
1
cisco 7960 sccp firmware version?
I have some Cisco 7960's and want to use them with SCCP - I have gotten it working with a few different firmware versions but all seem a little flakey. I know that SCCP is not as solid as SIP but am wondering, which firmware version is advised for use with chan_sccp from http://chan-sccp.sourceforge.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: