similar to: Re: Dial outbound trunk numbers in a round-robin sequence?

Hi All, Customer is requesting 1 incoming toll free #, that dial out to 4 different terminating numbers, not ring all at once but ring #1, then #2, then #3, then #4, then back to #1 consecutively on inbound calls, regardless if someone is on #1. So this is not like a hunt group, more like an agent queue set with a round-robin sequence. I know agents can do this, not too familiar with agents

Hi All, I know I can do this pretty easily with one of the SIP Proxy/Routers, I already do this using OpenSER as a load balancer. I have a special requirement that insist an Asterisk server, 1.6.1.x, is used. I will have 2 SIP trunks coming into the server and I will have to send calls to these SIP trunks with a round robin distribution pattern. I was thinking of using a group count

I was wondering if anyone has an easy way to emulate dialing in a round robin fashion like when you use Zap/r1 for Zap trunks. At the moment what I do is simply make a macro that will dial the sip trunks in order so if the first one fails it goes to the second and so on. The problem with this approach is that the first few SIP trunks will always be busy because of outgoing traffic. Is there an

Hi Folks, I implemented an Asterisk 1.2.10 on a Debian GNU/Linux, and I have implemented a round robin queue (and a memory round robin queue too). Here I have one simple problem: - agent 1 (busy) - agent 2 (busy) - agent 3 (free) When someone call to my queue, the action of the queue is this: call agent 1, then call agent 2, and then call agent 3, that is free and finally ring. There is

Hi, I have configured a call queue as follows: [sales] music = default strategy = roundrobin timeout = 20 retry = 5 reportholdtime = yes announce = queue-sales member => Agent/9021 member => Agent/5901 member => Agent/9020 member => Agent/1114 Now, I would expect all calls to this queue to be delivered first to 9021, then to 5901, then to 9020, then to 1114 (all agents are logged in

> > The internal DNS is NOT supporting round robin. As Rowland said use Bind9 > That's news to me! If so, then the internal DNS backed is not suitable for multiple DC's. (Though, I could've sworn it worked on versions 4.2+ < 4.7. It's on my to-do list to explore this further with different versions.)

Hi, samba 3.0.24, debian etch I'm seeing a strange effect with samba and traffic over a bond0 interface in round robin mode. 2 server each with 2 GbE interfaces as bond0 device ind rr mode. netio benchmark: NETIO - Network Throughput Benchmark, Version 1.26 (C) 1997-2005 Kai Uwe Rommel TCP connection established. Packet size 1k bytes: 182840 KByte/s Tx, 197599 KByte/s Rx. Packet size

Hello everybody, i have two gsm line (extra channels) and i'd like to schedule the outgoing calls with a round-robin strategy. If all the gsm lines are busy, the call must be sent to the pri lines with a linear strategy. here is the dialplan: exten => gsm,ChanIsAvail(EXTRA/r2&DAHDI/g1) same => n,GotoIf($["${AVAILORIGCHAN}" = ""]?unavail,1) same =>

Hi, Anyone knows if there is a way to play a list of sound file in a round robin mode (at specific interval) while someone in waiting in moh in a queue? Ok, you enter a queue and wait listening to moh, every X minutes a sound file is played from a list of sound files to be played. If that possible and if so how? Thanks for any pointers. Andre

I need to send calls to a bank of servers in a round robin fashion. Has anybody implemented this in dialplan language? If not, in some other fashion. </edg>

Hello, I''m new to the list and iproute2 itself. I was searching for a way to simultaneously use several IPs on the *same network interface* for outbound traffic. Let me explain: I have eth0 interface to which I set 2 IP addresses; 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. Then I want to connect to Internet through 192.168.0.254 gateway using round-robin between those 2 addresses. The iproute2

I want to add another server to my existing Samba environment and use DNS round robin to do load balancing. Both will use same smb.conf. Is anyone out there using this kind of setup? I have few quick questions: 1. Can "interfaces" statement be used in DNS round robin. If yes, then how? 2. Should "preferred master= yes" be defined on both boxes? Thanks.

Hello All, I've encountered a problem with OpenSSH_3.7.1p2 and krb5 authentication that I did not have using previous OpenSSH versions and krb5. I have a group of machines that are all listed as addresses for hostname.domain.blah via round-robin dns. When attempting to ssh to hostname.here.blah using krb5 auth, I get the following error: (client side) debug1: Authentications that can

Hi all, I have a cheapskate customer whom wants to leverage some cheap all-you-can-eat VoIP connections rather than pay for a per minute provider. On the inbound side I think I have a solution in that I can activate the "call forward on busy" option with his provider (some noname white label house) but how do I balance his outgoing minutes? Is there some way that I can set up a round

Hello, Our service has multiple Samba servers to serve up the same directories for our users. The users map to a single address, which directs them to a server by round-robin DNS. This hasn't really been a problem until recently. One user in particular complains that he loses his session, often in the middle of editing a document, causing problems with Windows file locking and he says he

Hi, Using ctdb, is it a valid setup to have : CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses containing only one ip address, thus with no round-robin. Is there a particular hard-coded limit that doesn't allow this? -- Nicolas Ecarnot

This is posed as a question more that a statement, so if you can show that I'm wrong, please feel free to correct / flame me. A couple of years ago, I identified a file corruption issue caused by two people attempting to edit the same file via two different Samba servers. The file was in a shared file space, mounted on both Samba servers via NFS. The problem, I believe, lies in the fact

> From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> > Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion > Hi, > just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :) > > There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to > consider IPs or ports. > What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP > adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ? > It would solve both

hello list i have installed 2 diguim card in my server using asterisk 1.4 (i use the old version with zapata.conf and zaptel.conf) i want to use the span 1 for group 1 and span 2-span 6 for the group 2 (i want to active the round-robin for span 2 and 6) in order to activate the WIMAX and FH please see the configuration below and tell me if there is anything wrong question 2: what is

The internal DNS is NOT supporting round robin. As Rowland said use Bind9 Am 19.09.18 um 22:36 schrieb Kris Lou via samba: > Hi all, > > I seem to have run into a case where my DC's aren't being round-robin'ed by > DNS. I've got 3 DC's using Internal DNS, but every time I ping mydomain.com > and check the results (ipconfig /displaydns), it's always in the