similar to: Re: Digium TE407P vs. Sangoma A104d

Has anyone had experience with one or both of these cards? I'm in a position where I might need to recommend one over the other. I've read everything that I can find online, so now I'd like to hear of personal experiences. Everything I read on both cards is "5 stars! Awesome! It Rocks!" They both seem to have similar capabilities, similar pricing, etc. Could those of

I have a system that I am trying to get a port on a Sangoma A104d card connected to an Adtran 850 with 5 FXS modules and 1 FXO module. A problem I am having is figuring out what cable should be used from the port on the Sangoma to the JP2 port on the Adtran. Tried was a cross-over T1 (1->4, 2->5, 4->1, 5->2) as well as a straight T1 (1->1, 2->2, 4->4, 5->5). Neither one

Hi, I am facing an audio-problem with the dial application and I (!) think, that it is connected to the dahdi parameter "overlapdial=yes". Sangoma support does not see any connection between this. But when enabling this option I face with some(!) dial-partners a audio one-way issue (the called party can not be heard). Only using PSTNS (germany e1 trunk) - no voip. Is there any

Hi all, as good? I try to install asterisk-1.2.14, zaptel-1.2.12,libpri-1.2.4,addons-1.2.5 , sounds-1.2.1 and wanpipe-2.3.4-3 and hwec-utils-beta4-2.3.4 But it is not compiling drivers of the Sangoma, why udev's for board in "/dev/zap"(1-31, channel,ctl,pseudo,timer) is not created. But when I install a board TE110P Digium, udev's is created and asterisk functions perfectly. : )

Hello List! I wanted to share to everyone the following compatible connectivity products that my company installed in our Asterisk based soft switch. I already sent these to the Asterisk.org site many days ago but for some reason they still have to post it. 1. Sangoma A101 single port E1/T1/PRI Card 2. Sangoma A102 dual port E1/T1/PRI Card 3. Sangoma A104 quad port E1/T1/PRI Card 4. Sangoma

Hi all, I need to setup call using particular timeslot on one of E1's. I've looked into http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+Zap+channels and it says that: exten => TestTrakt,1,Dial(ZAP/1-2/517255333) exten => TestTrakt,2,hangup should work and force call setup via span 1 (port 1) but when I try setup call rasterisk says: -- Executing [TestTrakt at

Here's my planed setup : PRI from telco <--> (port 1 of A104d) * (port 2 of A104d) <--> PM3 The PM3, for those who don't know is lucent's portmaster RAS dial-up router. I had setup asterisk, zaptel, libpri, wanpipe (as I have sangoma's cards). In wancfg, I have port 1 as TDM_VOICE, with hardware echo on, span 1. Port 2 is TDM_VOICE, without hw echo, Clock as

Hello all, as good? I am trying to use the package astunicall-1.2.21.0.1 with a Sangoma A104D card and 04 links E1 mfc/r2 in Brazil. The compilation occurred, normally and links is UP if I place in Loop and I obtain to effect called in Loop, but when I extend for the PSTN, links reports the following messages, without asterisk start calls: Dec 5 22:27:12 WARNING[3868]: chan_unicall.c:627

Hello, Several people asked to get a hold of the stats I used to determine that the Sangoma T1/E1 boards performed better in our real-world tests than the Digium boards. We've decided to post our results after confirming them over the past month of operations. Here is a link to the last two reviews I wrote about Sangoma with Asterisk:

We're looking at using 4 or 8 port T1 cards with echo cancellation and are evaluating brands to go with. We know that Sangoma has excellent solutions especially when it comes to echo. But we still have to hear about actual performance of a Digium card using the same Octasic DSP echo canceller. Would appreciate hearing something on this. --------------------------------- Sponsored Link

We have several Sangoma cards that we used during a transition time in our the replacement of our legacy voice system that we no longer need. Each of them saw about a month of service and are in good working order. We'd be happy to get 70% of retail for them. They are as follows: qty 2 A104D PCI w/ on board echo cancelation - $1500 each qty 1 A102D PCI w/ on board echo cancelation - $1050

Hi List, Just a little question about a notice from asterisk I don't understand: Here is what I have as soon as I place a call on a E1 line with an a104D Sangoma Card ( asterisk 1.2.9.1 ) : Jun 26 18:57:24 NOTICE[16489] channel.c: Don't know what to do with control frame 15 Does Anyone has a clue of how to get rid of that ? May it's because I use the HDLC decoding in hardware ?

Hello, I've recently bought a new Sangoma A104d PCI-card. WANPIPE release is 3.4.7. Machine is a dual Xeon with Debian 5.0.3. Asterisk is 1.6.11 with recent libpri and dahdi. When I boot the machine (including hardware and wanpipe and dahdi drivers) and start asterisk, everthing runs fine for almost 5 minutes. Then every few seconds HDLC errors occour. I also tried booting - and starting

Hi ! We curently have a centos 5 / asterisk 1.4 server that we have some DTMF problems with. It has a Sangoma A104d card and only port one is used to connect to the PSTN. Port 2 is conencted via a cross-over cable to a RAS for modem access and port 3 is connected for data communication via PPP. Now, I want to freshen this setup to something newer. So I installed a Scientific Linux 6 server,

Howdy, Just installed a new switch in a new location (Ubuntu, 2.6.24-24 kernel, zaptel 1.4.12.1 built from source, libpri-1.4.10.1 built from source, asterisk 1.4.26 built from source, wanpipe 3.5.4 built from source, Sangoma A104d with firmware that is probably a year old). I plugged in an RBS T1, ESF, B8ZS, wink start, and MF signalling. I stuck with the defaults that the wanpipe build

Hi all, We are running Asterisk 1.2.7.1 on our Dell Poweredge 2850 and are having massive sound quality issues. We are experiencing call quality issues for our remote location, namely calls cutting out and breaking up for our agents. The two main issues seem to be 'popping' and 'dropping' - popping would be pops and crackles on the line, where dropping would be complete audio

Hi All, as good? I am trying to make a call for the Unicall channels and after the exchange of signalling and sending of the digits asterisk locks up with the sending of the signalling "E" and the TELCO says that asterisk would have to send signalling "F", as to make for asterisk to send signalling "F"? The TELCO says that the signalling "E" is

Hi Sangoma a104 card have in product specyfication support for Line protocol SS7 , http://www.sangoma.com/products/p_aft-104-specs.htm [..] Line protocols Frame Relay, X.25, HDLC, PPP, SS7, Transparent bit-stream, BSC. [..] Anyone of you guys use line protocol SS7 for E1/T1 termination in asterisk ? As far I know asterisk don't have support for SS7 signaling, but my telco wants to setup

Upgrading an ancient customer installation... was running 1.4.23.1 (Trixbox) with Zaptel 1.4.12.9 and a Sangoma A102D, which has been running fine for 5+ years. Customer getting anxious about hardware failure, so we built a new box and installed 1.8.24.0, Dahdi 2.7.0.1, and a new Sangoma A104D. The single active span is an RBS T1 B8ZS/ESF/E&M Wink. I tried to move one span over one

Is there an implementation of the Cox-Snell residuals / Nelson-Aalen plot for goodness of fit? Or otherwise is there an appropriate Goodness of Fit diagnostic? Thanks Murray -- Murray Pung Statistician, Datapharm Australia Pty Ltd 0404 273 283 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]