similar to: T1 + E&M

Maybe of you guys know the answer to this: We have T1's that come from both MCI and Global Crossing as channelized (24 Ports per T) with inband (DTMF) delivery of ANI and DNIS (format = *DNIS*ANI*). My old equipment was set for D4, AMI, SF and Wink Start and so is Asterisk. I've moved these T's to Asterisk TE410P and inbound calls are arriving to external voice mail system correctly

Maybe one of you can help me with this: We have T1's that come from both MCI and Global Crossing as uses channelized (24 Ports per T) with inband (DTMF) ANI and DNIS delivery (format = *DNIS*ANI*). My old equipment was set for D4, AMI, SF and Wink Start and so is Asterisk Server. I've moved these T's to Asterisk TE410P and inbound calls are arriving to external voice mail

I'm a bit confused about how to handle this. I have Asterisk sitting in the middle between a Qwest Long Distance T1 (Voice T1, D4, SF, AMI) and an external voice mail PC using a Dialogic D/240SC-T1 card. The Qwest T1 originally was connected to the Dialogic card directly. The signaling was set to E&M Wink Start because Dialogic used this as its default settings, so it just worked

I'm a bit confused on how to setup Zaptel.conf and Zapata.conf when there is a TDM400P and a TE410P installed after upgrade. The TDM400P has 2 FXS in position 1 & 2 and 1 FXO in the fourth position. I see boot, WCT4xxP loading first and WCFXS loading second. According to my understanding, given above, the TE410P should be configured first, then the TDM400P. However, I'm not sure

Hello! We are using the Digium 405PP card, and getting the following messages: Jun 16 16:16:17 NOTICE[81926]: chan_zap.c:6832 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 6 on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 16 16:16:17 NOTICE[81926]: chan_zap.c:6832 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 8 on Primary D-channel of span 1 My config file is below. We are trying to set up D-Channel on channel 24, 1-23 in trunk group 1,

Hi All, I have just migrated from Asterisk 1.0.0 to Asterisk 1.0.5 and I have an X100P installed. The old asterisk was working, but now the new version isn't picking up any calls! However, I did notice that after installation, I performed modprobe zaptel and modprobe wcfxo and they worked fine, but when I executed ztcfg, I get the following errors: ioctl(ZT_LOADZONE) failed: Invalid

Hi, I'm trying to bring up two PRIs from qwest with asterisk and dahdi. I'm using an OpenVox D410E and the drivers are loaded. My system.conf looks like this: # Span 1: TE4/0/1 "T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 1" B8ZS/ESF RED span=1,2,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-24 # Span 2: TE4/0/2 "T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 2" (MASTER) B8ZS/ESF RED span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=25-47 dchan=48 These

Dear members of the list, I have difficulties to obtain sync with a Digium TE420 PCI Express For four entries E1, In my case I am with only 3 E1s available to configure. The telephony operator is BrasilTelecom and Signaling is R2 Digital. The information I have is that are E1s with 32 channels, not have sure. My settings Have been based on the link reference:

I keep getting a red alarm when trying to setup asterisk to use my TE420B EC. I only have a blank context setup in my extensions.conf as I haven't started to config that until I can clear this red alarm. I don't have physical access to the server, so I can't go reseat the modules/card/ethernet cable, though I have hands on location that have done this a couple times

I'm trying to install a TE410P this is what happens with compiled zaptel 1.0.9, 1.2-beta and 1.0.9 from http://updates.xorcom.com/iso/ this is my zaptel.conf (checked with the provider the values): span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 loadzone=it defaultzone=it then I modprobe wct4xxp debug=1 t1e1override=15 and the kernel says : Sep 30 16:12:40 localhost kernel: Zapata

Hi, I'm trying to connect a PC with a TE410P to an E1/IP equipment. Unfortunately I keep getting a yellow alarm from zaptel (in zttool) and a Loss of Framing alarm on the remote equipment. The E1/IP is connected on the other side to a PRI interface on a GSM MSC. I have configured the span as: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 (also tried span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3) and the channels as: bchan=1-15,17-31

Hi, I am about to pull my hair out after trying to get our PRI up and working. We are switching from a Cisco gateway to an Asterisk box which provides the 23 phone lines for our office. So, because the Cisco gateway is working I can assume I have all the settings right (b8zs, esf, dms100, etc) and the PRI is live (because we are switching over). When dialing from PSTN, I get busy signal. When

I just managed to put in a TE410 card in an Asterisk box to work with OnRamp 20(E1 downunder). I am able to dial in but was not able to dial out. Can anyone offer me some advice please? In my extensions.conf, I just put in: [default] ... exten => 0,1,Dial(Zap/g1) and I get this on the console when I dialled 0. -- Executing [0 at default:1] Dial("SIP/5166-b76004f8",

Commit-ID: 029622dfbfe25203275a385a5bf33d44c2409b00 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=029622dfbfe25203275a385a5bf33d44c2409b00 Author: Benjamin Cama <benjamin.cama at telecom-bretagne.eu> AuthorDate: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:17:01 +0200 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:23:14 +0200 [klibc] nfsmount: Fix

Hi anyone have a idea for debug my digium TE405P card ? My zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 loadzone = fr defaultzone = fr My Zapata.conf: [channels] language=fr context=from-E1 switchtype = euroisdn pridialplan = unknown signalling = pri_cpe usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes

I've done a decent size update of the OpenSSH portable from the upstream tree. There is an AES upgrade that needs to take place, but I need people to test and tell me what endedness changes need to be applied (if any). Attached is the patch. It is geared towards the latter snapshots..Unsure how it will patch (if at all) against 2.9pX series. Thanks. - Ben "This is dark day in

Hi, When mounting a NFS share and an error occurs for some reason, the NFS share is not unmounted correctly: the local path is used instead of the remote path in the umount_v[23]() call. This patch fixes this. I found this while debugging some problems mounting the root file system on NFS in a test system; I saw this in the logs (/mnt/duplicated is the legitimate remote path): Jun 21

When I send a call from my TE410P using E&M, the legacy PBX answers the call but doesn't route it. Any idea what this could be? I assume the digits aren't being delivered properly to the legacy pbx. Any suggestions on what config settings to muck with? Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r40901 built by root @ pbx04 on a i686 running Linux on 2007-01-14 14:05:02 UTC zaptel.conf

Steve, Here is the config, I pulled from my server, that works with D'Link Phones: Main Menu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIP.CONF [general] port = 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060) ;bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine) bindaddr = 67.109.153.236 disallow=all ;allow=ilbc allow=gsm allow=ulaw

I have a box with 12 T1s (4 Te410P cards). The PSTN provider is reporting slips and ask me to update the clock source. I have my system.conf set as the following but when I run dahdi_scan only the ports on Card 1 are showing up with syncsrc=1 system.conf : span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=2-24 mtp2=1 span=2,2,0,esf,b8zs bchan=26-48 mtp2=25 span=3,3,0,esf,b8zs bchan=49-72