similar to: updates with RedHat packages?

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

Hello, I've been talking with some friends about the Redhat's SRPMs release issue. I've been reading the trademarks and some points of GPL. But get some confusion around the questions: Is redhat forced to release the sources of its product? Is redhat forced, due GPL licence, to make the sources of its product available to others (including those who don't buy the distro), and

http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8 Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the relationship between CentOS and RHEL. Although it is complex. After all, if too many choose CentOS, there may no longer be a CentOS. However, I don't think I would refer to CentOS as a "parasite" as the author Matt Asay does. More appropriate

Hello https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ According to above, I found following message. ---------------------- Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided in these Guidelines, the following are examples of unacceptable uses: 1.Use of the CentOS Marks in connection with commercial redistribution of CentOS software ---------------------- I have a question. What means "Use of the

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]:

Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally handle all the trademark usage queries.) The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ That document should give the GNOME project all of the authorization and guidelines on how to use and not use the CentOS marks. Fabiano -- if you have any further questions, you may also

Hi folks, AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra- structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside. RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on open source (GPL2, GPL3, Apache license, whatever). For building the binary RPMs other open source RPMs with

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:24:19PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > 6. Design a simple recognisable logo. > > How about a "LLVM Inside" logo like the Intel one. Another project 'TAL' > has used a smular looking logo :- > > http://www.cs.cornell.edu/talc/ It's not original, and we don't want any logo/trademark lawsuits from Intel. -- Misha Brukman

Hi, I simply asked to upstream for a clarification on the use of the Xen trademark, and received two unambiguous answers. From Citrix: Actually, for the community, you can do whatever you like. The FIT test only applies to commercially distributed Xen products - and is about ensuring compatibility between vendors. Do you need more detail than that?

People, Firstly, sorry for the cross-list post (centos-devel and centos-docs). I'd like to reach you in order to ask for a formal authorization to use CentOS logo on GNOME Boxes[0]. GNOME Boxes already shows a few other distro's logos as you can check here[1]. Would be possible to get the explicit confirmation that we could use CentOS logo as well? [0]:

Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the

L.S. Since some time there is a new r-project.org site as announced here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2015/000581.html The logo has changed on the site, but I fail to find a vector graphics file. For the previous logo I used to go to https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/Logo/ Is there anything similar for the new logo? Many thanks in advance. Kind regards, Tobias --

Hello I would like to ask if it's possible to display Theora logo at http://ronja.twibright.com/sw.php I use Theora for automatically generated videos at http://ronja.twibright.com/3d/ If yes can I please have the master of the logo? I cannot use the small logo you have on the website. Thanks, Karel Kulhavy

I plan to highlight the differences between RHEL and CentOS 3.1. Making this information clearly available without the need for duplicated effort across the world. This will help others take CentOS in different directions benefiting us all. It will help individuals create new projects more easily and efficiently. Are the diff files readily available, can I download them from anywhere? If the

On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 12:41 -0400, Mike - st257 wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net> wrote: > > > >> I thought the logo in CentOS-6 was very pleasant. > > > > The fact remains that booting was attractive, and now it isn't. > I'll agree that the boot splash change from EL6 to EL7 differs a lot. > >

Hi, I was wondering if there are any guidelines for the use of the R logo on websites which are for commercial use? Similar to http://www.python.org/community/logos/ for Python and to http://www.postgresql.org/community/propaganda for PostgreSQL perhaps? thanks, Jan

--On Sunday, September 02, 2018 8:49 AM +0200 Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Just a suggestion. I don't think this mailing list is the right place > for tutorials, the more so since they contain some wrong information. > > For this kind of thing, you can have a blog (like the one I have linked > in my signature). And use this list for the odd question

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Can you get the product without being bound by the restrictions? > That is, can one user purchase one and resell copies without the SLA > or with their own? Not with the trademark, that is mis-appropriation. If you want to complain about Red Hat doing this, then you'll want to complain about a number of distributors well before

Hello, I'd like to test if 3.10.6 version fixes the problem . I'm wondering which is the correct way to upgrade from 3.10.5 to 3.10.6. It's hard to find upgrade guides for a minor release. Can you help me please ? Thanks in advance Ismael ________________________________ De : Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> Envoy? : dimanche 17 septembre 2017 14:56 ? : ismael

The backport just got merged few minutes back and this fix should be available in next update of 3.10. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, ismael mondiu <mondiu at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello Team, > > Do you know when the backport to 3.10 will be available ? > > Thanks > > > > > ------------------------------ > *De :* Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at