Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "TE411P Really Bad Echo ORION"
2006 Feb 05
11
TE411P Really Bad Echo
I just implemented a system using a TE411P hardware echo cancellation
card. Per Digium, I setup zaptel.conf, and zapata.conf the same way as
I always have. To my surprise calls out to the PSTN had a terrible
echo. 1 - 2 second delay, and quite clear. The echo was so bad that I
had to remove the hardware echo cancellation module from the card. We
are only using the 1st span of this card right
2005 Dec 16
8
HW Echo Cancellers
Hi,
To solve echo problems, I'm considering 2
alternatives.
1> Sangoma A104d
- I can't find support for asterisk 1.2.1
2> Desktop echo canceller
-
http://www.oriontelecom.com/echo_canceller/desktop/e1_ec_desktop.html
- I want to know where to buy and price.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks.
Jason.
p.s. : asterisk cli command "reload" can change
rx_gain and
2002 Sep 30
4
2 plots sharing axis / combining factors
Dear R users,
- Is it possible to produce a figure with 2 plots that they share one of
the axis, e.g., the y-axis?
I did not succeed by setting mai[4] <- 0. Is there a simple way?
- How could I convert 2 factor variables in a single factor variable
which is the combination of the other 2.
Example:
lith: a factor 2 levels "ca", "ma"
sp: a factor with 2 levels,
2005 Oct 12
3
E400P vs te410p vs te411p
Hi,
I found E400P quad PRI card quite cheap (749USD):
http://www.govarion.com/product_info.php?cPath=1&products_id=2&osCsid=68cdd6e3d08754
in comparison to te410p (approx 1500 USD )
http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=product_detail&category=hardware&product=TE410P
Now newer generation with HW echo canceling emerged (te411p).
I'm not sure in what things those two cards
2006 Feb 01
2
TE411P or TE406P
Hi Guys,
I need your recommendation which card to buy?The TE411P or TE406P do they have any difference?I check their brochures they are differ only when it comes to PCI slot voltages.Which card best to use?Btw,Il be using supermicro board with 3.3V and 5.5V?Will il be experiencing problem during the implementation later on if i choose the wrong PCI voltage options?Will it depends on
2007 Feb 07
2
CPU & motherboard for 100+ simultaneouse calls on Digium Quad E1 TE411p
hi!
anyone please recommend/guide me of purchasing a resonably high performance
server system regarding processor(s) & motherboard (+ other compulsary
peripherals i.e. VGA, Soundcard). Mentioning up-to-date vendor+model will be
more helping
I've to use Digium TE411p Quad E1 card
signalling on the E1 is SS7
no. of simultaneouse calls is 100+
regards
-------------- next part
2005 Aug 12
1
Suggestions for mainstream hardware compatible with TE411P.
I checked the list of what not to use, but am still having no
fun trying to find a working box. Can someone suggest a Compaq or Dell or
MPC or . any other brand and model that is known to work well with the
TE411P ? Will an old Proliant do?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2006 Apr 04
0
New User's Query , which card TE411P or TE410P
Hi All
This mail is from a new comer to asterisk ,
just exploring
I was going through the digium web site , In
need some advice and suggestions , which card I should
chose , should I choose
TE411P (with on board
echo cancellation ) or TE410P
If I go for TE411P , I will be spending 1,000 $ more
and for me finance part is critical , will I face
2006 Apr 11
1
TE410P upgrade to TE411P => (solution to) no more fax carrier detection !
I changed from a TE410P to a TE411P and fax carriers weren't detected
anymore !
I have tried everything (recompile zaptel+asterisk+spandsp ;
echocancel=yes/no ; rxgain=0/txgain=0 ; increase Wait() ; ...), nothing
worked.
The only solution that worked for me was to install and use NVFaxDetect.
HTH.
2006 Apr 28
1
Official TE411P echo settings??
I have seen conflicting references in regards to the Digium Wildcard TE411P echo settings in zapata.conf.
Does anyone have the official word on this?
Should echo cancel be enabled in zapata.conf if the card has built in EC?
If so, should a particular EC method be compiled into the zaptel build?
My reference, which has echo:
My zaptel is 1.2.5
context=from-pstn
switchtype=national
2005 Aug 23
1
Asterisk 1.0.9: TE411P replacement for TE410P 1stgen causes crashes
Hi all,
I replaced a TE410P Rev C 1st Generation Firmware with a TE411P
without any cfg changes (zaptel/zapata).
As a result Asterisk crashes on outbound from PRI4 going to PRI1 calls:
Aug 23 18:22:00 WARNING[4693]: chan_zap.c:7545 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got a
UA, but i'm in state 1
Aug 23 18:22:00 WARNING[4693]: chan_zap.c:7545 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got a
UA, but i'm in state 1
2006 Feb 09
1
4 TE411P in one server installation
Dear all,
Does anyone try to install 2 or multiple TE411 card into one server? Can it
be done? What about stability?
Thanks
Ray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060209/b65a1d46/attachment.htm
2005 Sep 08
2
TE411P zapata.conf, monitoring echo cancellation and echo tail size
Hi all,
1. Just bought a new TE411P and about to install it replacing the existing
TE410P. I am assuming I need to set echocancel=no and
echocancelwhenbridged=no now that it will be done in hardware, correct?
2. Is there any way to monitor hardware echo cancellation to ensure it is
working (apart from being on a call)?
3. The Digium webite says "By supporting 16ms with 128 channels or
2006 Dec 18
1
Asterisk + Orion E1 GSM Gateway
Hi,
I just got hold on an Orion E1 30 port GSM Gateway, and I am having problems trying to get the E1
link to come up. I am using Asteisk 1.2.12 with a Sangoma A101 card. I am quite familiar with
E1's, both the Digium and Samgoma types, as I have successfully hooked up to many PBX's and such,
but I just cant seem to get this one to work.
None of the 30 channels 'come up'.
2014 Jun 18
1
Nobreak LACERDA NEW ORION 800VA
Hi,
It's just to confirme that I've tested and NUTUPS is working fine with
hardware below:
Manufacturer: LACERDA
Hardware: NEW ORION 800VA
Driver: blazer_usb
Thanks for that.
Regards,
Alex.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20140618/3a98edf3/attachment.html>
2006 Feb 27
0
TE411P problem-- probably stupid.
Hi,
Probably a stupid syntax problem.. but can't seem to make
these files work for more than the first T1 (ok, if I comment out
the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th span).
Can someone proofread this for me?
Thanks!
======================
zaptel.conf
span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=1-23
dchan=24
span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=25-47
dchan=48
span=3,0,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=49-71
dchan=72
span=4,0,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=73-95
2006 Mar 01
1
TE411P VPM
Does anyone know how to disable the VPM in software rather than removing
the card altogether? The canceler isn't working as well as the software
cancelers were.
Aaron
2006 May 09
1
TE411P or TE410P
I am looking at the two Digium cards mentioned and am not sure if the echo
cancelation is a must. The sever is a 2.8Ghz P4 with 2 GB of ram, and is
only for routing PSTN connections to another * server. I would like the
advice of the list before making my final decision.
--
Bruce
Nortex Networks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2005 Oct 05
2
TE411P and TE406P stability
I am getting ready to purchase my first Digium card to start experimenting with Asterisk. Before I make my purchase, I wanted to make sure I'm not going to have issues with these cards (need to see what the specs are on my box, 5V or 3.3V PCI ). I will be using Asterisk @ Home, so will be Asterisk v1.0.9. I took a quick poke at the lists, and it appears several people have been having
2005 Aug 05
1
TE411P problem
List,
I just tried to swap out our 410 for a 411 and we started have
problems with on of our T1's.
Setup:
Span 1 - Dedicated PRI for long distance.
Span 2 - 12 channels fxs_gs outgoing local.
12 Channels em_w incoming DID's.
I didn't have any problems with the PRI. The trouble was with the T1.
We were unable to place any local calls, and all incoming DID's where
garbled.