Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Problem with installation of rpm's, Please, help me."
2006 Jan 16
1
Problem with installation of rpm's, Please help me.
Hi All,
I am a newbie and trying to install Asterisk from instructions given in
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+RPM. We have Centos 3.3 so
I downloaded rpm's from
ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/LSE/packages/CentOS-3.4/asterisk-1.0.9/ and tried
installing one by one but I get the following errors
error: Failed dependencies:
asterisk = v1.0.9 is needed by
2006 Jan 16
2
New RPM packages for CentOS4.0
Greetings list,
It's been a while since I've been able to focus on asterisk packaging
but this weekend I took some time to audit and recompile packages for
CentOS 4.2. You can find them here.
ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/ftp/pub/releases/CentOS-4.0
You have your choice of 1.2.1 or 1.0.10 releases. If you need zaptel
modules then install this kernel as well:
2006 Jan 26
5
Asterisk 1.2.3 CentOS 4.x RPMS
Available in the usual place.
ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/releases/CentOS-4.0
This release includes minor spec changes, spandsp 0.0.2pre23, a new
Sangoma wanpipe RPM for use with the LSE kernel rpm and an AMP
installation document.
Best Regards,
--
Andrew McRory - President/CTO
Linux Systems Engineers, Inc. - http://www.linuxsys.com
Located in beautiful Tallahassee, Florida
Office
2004 Oct 05
0
New Asterisk-CVS and Kernel/ALSA support RPMS Available NOW!
Hi folks,
Anyone want to check out the subject packages will find them here:
ftp://www.linuxsys.com/pub/testing/asterisk
The asterisk RPMS now include builds of asterisk, addons, astcc, btp,
gastman, iaxproxy, libpri and zaptel from 10.04.04 CVS. zaptel is compiled
and working with kernel-2.4.22-0.FC1.LSE.p3.i686.rpm available with ALSA
modules and supporting packages here:
2004 Apr 09
0
RedHat/Fedora RPMS Update
Greetings folks,
I have updated our asterisk RPM repository with CVS builds for RH 7.3, 9
and FC1. The zaptel package is compiled against the supplied kerenel rpm
and SRPMS are supplied for those wishing to rebuild. Other than the CVS
update no other changes are made from previous releases...
Features
========
Security: runs as user asterisk not root
Convienance: Console automatically runs
2005 Jan 03
0
PRI Errors: Here is where I am at...
FYI: I hope that this is not a "me" error and that Digium can squash this
bug (or new hardware fixes it). Either way, when this is over, perhaps I
can provide some troubleshooting documentation for these errors.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:36:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Andrew McRory <amcrory@linuxsys.com>
To: support@digium.com
Subject: PRI Errors
2005 Jan 11
1
PRI Errors (HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel)
UPDATE. The circuit has run clean since the 7th. It seems the telco found
a problem after all but they can't tell me what they did... cause they
think it was fixed as part of another case. Grrr.
Well, I never doubted the T400P too much but I went ahead and bought a
different card just in case. Haven't had to use it so far.
One of the biggest reasons I did not think the Wildcard was at
2005 Jan 11
8
What is the best and easiest flavor to be used with Asterisk.
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2848 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050111/b2d08439/attachment.jpeg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
2004 Aug 05
0
Re: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #4831 - 4 msgs
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote:
> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:56:06 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Andrew McRory <amcrory@linuxsys.com>
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] PRI Errors... Ouch
> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
>
> Today is the first time I've had any show stopping errors with asterisk
2004 Dec 29
5
PRI Woes continue
System is built on a SuperMicro motherboard with Serverworks chipset, IRQ
is not shared. Have a dialplan that worked for 8 months without errors,
tried reverting to older release then upgraded to 1.0.3 stable release,
currently running on fedora core 1 kernel 2.4.22-nptl.2199 (have tried
plain jayne), telco says "it's not us", HDLC abort seems to occur when
when a Zap channel hangs
2005 Feb 04
0
FC2 RPMS are updated
Hello,
I've uploaded current builds to
ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/releases/FC2/asterisk-CVS
ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/releases/FC2/asterisk-1.0
Regards,
--
Andrew McRory - President and Chief Techincal Officer
Linux Systems Engineers, Inc. - http://www.linuxsys.com
Located in beautiful Tallahassee, Florida
Office 850-224-5737
Office 850-575-7213
Mobile 850-294-7567
2004 Dec 20
2
Can asterisk be run as non root anymore?
safe_asterisk used to work fine but with v1.0.3 I am getting all kinds of
permission errors, intermittant failures, etc. Even with file permissions
relaxed and ownership set to asterisk it craps out. Seems to work fine
when run as root. Comments???
--
Andrew McRory - President/CTO
Linux Systems Engineers, Inc. - http://www.linuxsys.com
Located in beautiful Tallahassee, Florida
Office
2006 Feb 28
1
Problem calling out
Hi All,
I installed Asterisk recently and it was working from 2 weeks without a problem
until today. Today it started showing strange error
Feb 28 03:14:08 WARNING[31430]: chan_sip.c:4826 check_auth: Stale nonce received
from '<sip:18006733555@mantragroup.com>'
Whatever number I call it displays this, please tell how can I fix this? I have
no idea what is happening and the cause
2005 Jan 04
0
"Hey look ma, it's not an RPM..."
I created a tarball for redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.28, asterisk
v1.0.3-CVS-01.04.05 and alsa-1.0.6a... see the README / download it here:
ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/packages/rh73/asterisk/
--
Andrew McRory - President/CTO
Linux Systems Engineers, Inc. - http://www.linuxsys.com
Located in beautiful Tallahassee, Florida
Office 850-224-5737
Office 850-575-7213
Mobile 850-294-7567
1999 May 08
1
OpenLinux 2.2: LISA install leaves root access without password
Hello,
I believe I''ve found a bug in the installation process of OpenLinux 2.2
when using the LISA boot disk. During the installation a temporary passwd
file is put on the new file system containing the user "help" set uid=0
gid=0 and no password. Once you are prompted to set the root password and
default user password a new passwd and shadow file is created yet the help
user
2004 Dec 23
8
asterisk at large
Hello *'s,
First Of all Marry Christmas,
I want to setup asterisk at large means "my main asterisk server placed
in my office(in Pakistan), and some offices outside Pakistan and i want
to connect these locations to my main * server (in Pakistan) on remote
locations i'll used asterisk can i do this or may be i changed my plans
kindly guides me.
Thanks In Advance.
Adnan Ahmed.
2005 Jan 12
3
What is the best and easiest flavor to be usedwith Asterisk.
Almost any distro will do, since 2.6 kenels are bleeding edge you might
have to spend more time getting everything working, and in most cases
you are best served by determining which distro your hardware
manufacturer supports, Dell typically supports only redhat, HP supports
suse on many boxes. While there are workarounds, having the hardware
manufacturer deal with driver issues is a bonus.
2004 Dec 15
0
PRI Errors again... sigh.
So it was working for several days without error then tonight while I'm
watching users login to the modem pool - BOOM! The sync changes when it
happens (which makes sense).
Zaptel: Master changed to Tor2/0/2
Zaptel: Master changed to Tor2/0/1
Zaptel: Master changed to Tor2/0/2
Zaptel: Master changed to Tor2/0/1
Interrupts should not be a factor THIS time:
[root@phone asterisk]# cat
2007 Dec 29
2
v1.0.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
v1.0.8 and v1.0.9 were a bit bad releases. Hopefully one day I've
managed to have written a proper test suite which can be run before
doing any releases..
* Security hole with LDAP+auth cache: If base setting contained
%variables they weren't included in auth cache key,
2007 Dec 29
2
v1.0.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
v1.0.8 and v1.0.9 were a bit bad releases. Hopefully one day I've
managed to have written a proper test suite which can be run before
doing any releases..
* Security hole with LDAP+auth cache: If base setting contained
%variables they weren't included in auth cache key,