similar to: ztdummy inaccuracy on linux-2.6

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "ztdummy inaccuracy on linux-2.6"

2005 May 15
5
zttest
I was browsing the applications developed in zaptel and came across zttest. After I run it, I get the following: Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 100.000000% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%
2005 Jun 11
0
Re: ztdummy/rtc - staticy audio
> I'm still having my (apparantly) timing problem, but I'll do some more > testing and make a separate thread for that. I'm generating an > outbound call through Asterisk. The inbound audio is good, but the > outbound audio is sometimes staticy. This seems to happen only at the > start of the call. These are short test calls, just playing a "weasels > ate our
2005 Jun 11
0
Re: ztdummy/rtc - staticy audio
> output of zttest: > Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... > 99.938965% 99.951172% 99.938965% 99.963379% 99.963379% 99.951172% > 99.951172% Ah. Don't be scared. This is actually -correct- when using RTC. Let me demonstrate: [root@dhcp5 zaptel]# ./zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8195 sample intervals 99.963379% 8192
2005 May 12
3
Something every TDMP user should know
> They instantly got us to look at the output of zttest and we found that this was (in their words) 'extremely low', with 'best' and > 'worst' readings of 99.975586% and 99.963379% respectively. Might want to give PCI latency setting a try, it helped for me. My ZTTEST would drop occasionally to 99.95% until I set: setpci -v -s 01:01.0 latency_timer=ff
2005 Jul 11
0
Modem Connection from TDM card to TE4xxP card
I just needed to test a dialup modem connection (don't ask) and I had a modem connected to a TDM card (FXS port) which then dialled out via a E1 PRI on a TE4xxp card. See my log below: atdt0198xxxxxx CONNECT 36000 V42bis ** Dial IP ** Username: xxxx Password: Entering PPP Session. IP address is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx MTU is 1500. OK ATH0 OK ATDT0198xxxxxx CONNECT 31200 V42bis ** Dial
2006 Apr 10
7
te110p and interrupts
Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [root@mollendo ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples
2007 Feb 02
2
Clock Drifts Off
I installed CentOS 4.4 32 bit on a dual core AMD64 motherboad. Its a Tyan Tomcat K8E motherboard with socket 939. The clock keeps drifting off like 5+ minutes an hour. Run ntpupdate hourly to compensate. Any ideas why or how to fix? Matt
2006 Jan 05
1
troubleshooting hangups?
I have some DID numbers that come into Asterisk via PRI, then connect to a Panasonic DBS PBX via PRI. Outbound calls from the PBX go out via PRI to Asterisk, then out to the Telco's PRI. The sync LEDs on my PBX show that it is synced to Asterisk via the PRI. I have users complaining about random hangups. What is the best way toi approach finding the issue? ref: zttest looks good. ./zttest
2006 Jan 16
2
question about zttest
Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but all that I get is: [root@SIP2-MI zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%
2007 May 14
3
zaptel huge irq problem
Hello, I had noticed strange crackling sound on my phone calls going through my zaptel device (TDM400P), so i decided to check on possible timer issue, and found lots of issues on forums concerning the sensibility of zaptel with IRQs, and tried about everything: moving PCI slots, noapic and acpi=off boot options, play with different kernel options: iosched/preemption/timer/..., play with
2006 Jun 02
2
Audio problems on Zap & SIP, local network, not IRQ related?
I am trying to get to the bottom of audio clicks, pops, dropouts with my Asterisk server. These occur even when the system is under minimal load (e.g. 1 Zap device in a queue being played music on hold) and occurs with both Zap and Sip devices so isn't network related. The audio problems occur at the same time on all channels and seems to be when Asterisk "gets busy" and uses
2004 Aug 30
0
Delays while playing a message
Hello, 1-2 sec pauses happen while * plays (streams) messages/prompts. We get reports about that from users and experience it ourselves randomly. Cannot reproduce it for debugging though, so need to figure out some other ways to fix it. 1. It's not silence recorded within or pauses between audio files 2. It's not load related - can happen with no load at all 3. We use decent boxes - dual
2007 Feb 07
9
Digium TE110P
Helo, I have problem with Digium TE110P connected to CISCO 3640 (port on NM-HDV-2E1-60) wth PRI E1 link. I use CISCO now for testing but when I tried with real PBX problem was exactly same. I have this messages in Asterisk conole and log sometimes: NOTICE[1115] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Usually 2-5 such messages in series, can be repeated after 10
2007 May 10
1
Cutted audio or 2/3s blanks on EuroISDN - Asterisk1.4
Your Zap conf files would be helpful. Zttest results? Cat /proc/interrupts. Sharing interrupts? Any funky error in the logs? Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Administrator TOOTAI > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:24 AM
2007 Jul 07
2
Fax and Asterisk
Hi I am trying to build reliable fax solution with asterisk, iaxmodem and hylafax. I am attempting to do this on Compaq DL-360 with 2 pentium 3 1.2GHz (512 cache) and 2GB of RAM. I am using a Sangoma A101. After installing the newest zaptel and wanpipe-3.1.0 beta I did zttest and it didn't give me good results: 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%
2009 Jun 28
5
How to change Disk sequence on DELL R900 CENTOS 5.3?
we have DELL R900 with CENTOS 5.3 in it. This DELL R900 come with one integrate PERC6/I and two PERC6/E card. DELL 6/I control 5 internal disks. The original disk sequence are: /dev/sda1 /boot /dev/sda2 / /dev/sdb1 swap ... after I configured PERC6/E disks and reboot, /dev/sda change to RAID disk and original /boot and / change to /dev/sde1 and /dev/sde2. My modprobe.conf is: alias
2008 Jul 14
5
so many problem CENTOS 5.2 with DELL servers????
?I have been installed?CENTOS 5.2 on several DELL servers and have following problems (even?latest patches apply): ? 1. DELL 2650 can NOT boot under?CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode ? 2. DELL R900 can NOT boot under?CENTOS 5.2 PAE mode (inifinite boot loop) ? 3. DELL R900 with 128 GB RAM can only see 15 GB RAM under?CENTOS 5.2 Xen mode ? Anyone know why?? IS?CENTOS 5.2 certify with DELL server? ? Does?CENTOS
2011 Jan 11
3
RAID configuration suggestion???
we have several DELL R900 with PERC 6/E adapter in it. R900 using Redhat Linux. Each R900 have two PERC 6/E adapter and at least two MD1000 connect to it. Configuration 1: PERC 6/E -- two MD1000 PERC 6/E -- empty Configuration 2: PERC 6/E -- MD1000 PERC 6/E -- MD1000 Normally first MD1000 for database and second MD1000 for nightly backup. My
2011 Feb 02
7
centos 5.5 check memoray usage too high???
We have DELL R900 server with 128GB RAM (CENTOS 5.5)in it. This server only have one application running and few people use it. Every week I ata least get one or two messages from monitor tool mail to me say: Message=Memory Utilization is 92.02%, crossed warning (80) or critical (90) threshold. Since server have 128 GB RAM and only 1 application. I really don't belive that. Does there
2010 Sep 28
1
small inaccuracy in startup warning message
Hi, Cosmetic. Starting R with e.g. --max-ppsize=-10 produces the following warning: WARNING: '-max-ppsize' value is negative: ignored The name of the option displayed in the warning is incorrect. Could that be fixed? See src/main/CommandLineArgs.c (there are 3 places in that file where the name of this option needs to be adjusted). This is with current R-alpha. Thanks! H. --