similar to: iax2 wireless and Multicast

if you read ahead you'll figure that the infrastructure of the network 'en gros' isn't made for it (yet). because of this (and not just because I am a fan of) I propose other trials with overlay networks which could (under proper application) even be more efficient than the multicast protocol(s) itself. Greets and out Gee ... .-. . . On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

I was already aware if this in the first place :-) On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote: > Hi buddylove, > > In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading > which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between > multicast and unicast communications: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast >

On 04/05/2016 03:48 πμ, buddylove wrote: > you have 'a' doubt? > precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here? > > this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software. > runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously > including shoutcast. > read the docs! > > > > On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote: >>

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 Bug ID: 85444 Summary: [NV46] Heavy corruption, no hardfreeze, back to console and libexa.so segfault Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

@Phil nice text... just want to mention (or better ask...) what the difference between a protocol which implements multiple connections simultaneously and a protocol implementing multiple connections by connection tracking? In the end... its the same... On 04.05.2016 10:25, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: >> Hi,

Hi all, We want linux (ubuntu) with 2.6 kernel to act as multicast router and to pass multicast packets between different subnets. And linux machine as router has two network cards having two different subnets assigned onto. We first worked "sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1" line on linux shell that made linux to work as unicast router. (like host, the multicast packets were discarded at

Buen día a todos, Alguien conoce si existe la manera de determinar cuellos de botella pasados o actuales en poblaciones naturales remanentes con información genética (microsatélites) en R. Gracias por su valiosa ayuda de antemano. Saludos, Diego ________________ Diego P. Vélez Mora Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas UNIVERSIDAD TÉCNICA PARTICULAR DE LOJA San Cayetano Alto s/n Loja, Ecuador

Hi, today a couple of Hypervisors got restarted due to a power outage. While the systems and the VMs on the are running fine multicast traffic between the guests is no longer working. I generate multicast udp packet using iperf in the guest and check on the host using tcpdump: tcpdump vnet0 => multicast packets are visible tcpdump vlanbr8 => multicast packets are visible tcpdump em1.8

Hi, there! I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found anything. Anyone can help me? Thanks -- Fran Delgado (ThinWay) Tumblr: http://thinway.tumblr.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/thinway -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi buddylove, In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between multicast and unicast communications: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicast Cheers, Jordan On 05/04/2016 06:39 AM, buddylove wrote: > @Phil > nice text... > just want to mention (or

Oh, well by your "In the end... its the same..." statement and your question of what the difference is (and mentioning connection tracking which is a completely different subject), I was a bit confused as to your query. Cheers, Jordan On 05/04/2016 09:55 AM, buddylove wrote: > I was already aware if this in the first place :-) > > On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

Hello, I noticed all my DC's have port 5353 closed. I'm using the internal DNS and wasn't sure if multicast DNS must be enabled? I do not appear to be having any DNS issues. My only concern is with the wiki on Multicast DNS. "By default, mDNS only and exclusively resolves host names ending with the |.local| top-level domain (TLD). This can cause problems if that domain

also, does unicast individually send out streams to each listener (requiring lots of bandwidth) or does it broadcast a stream and users can "tap in" (low bandwidth)? -------Original Message------- From: "Dan Chokola (webmail)" <teckyd at earthlink.net> Sent: 02/28/03 10:46 PM To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: [icecast] Multicast/Unicast > > what does icecast use?

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795 Summary: RELATED doesn't accommodate multicast UDP solicitation resulting in unicast reply Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Good morning, On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: > Hi, there! > I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or > both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found > anything. Anyone can help me? Icecast2 is a streaming solution that works using HTTP[0]. (HTTPS is also supported using both methods[1].) HTTP uses TCP[2][3]

On 31.07.2014 17:23, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 31.07.2014 15:14, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> Hi, >> today a couple of Hypervisors got restarted due to a power outage. While >> the systems and the VMs on the are running fine multicast traffic >> between the guests is no longer working. >> >> I generate multicast udp packet using iperf in the guest

Hi All, As it is written in the "Linux 2.4 Advanced Routing HOWTO" GRE tunneling has some benefits compare to IP-in-IP, on of it benefits is the ability to transport multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel. I used the mrouted daemon and I know that the daemon supports tunneling but I don''t want to use its tunneling method. Assuming I have gre0 as my tunneling device I did the

Hello. I am not subscribed to the list, so, please, if I do anything wrong just let me know politely and I'll try to improve :) I just want to know if there's any branch of nouveau version that will work with this chip. lspci lists it as: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108GLM [NVS 5200M] (rev a1) I think it's Fermi, but I am not sure. When I try to change

Hi, Ilia. Sorry for such a big delay in answering. Real life and that stuff... I am a newcomer so, please, if I do something wrong regarding my quoting style or whatever, just let me know and I'll quickly improve. :) El lun., 30 mar. 2020 a las 13:38, Ilia Mirkin (<imirkin at alum.mit.edu>) escribi?: > > Yes, GF108 is Fermi (F = Fermi). Reclocking is currently not available >

you have 'a' doubt? precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here? this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software. runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously including shoutcast. read the docs! On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote: > Hi, there! > I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. > I