similar to: zttest - 100% ?

I was browsing the applications developed in zaptel and came across zttest. After I run it, I get the following: Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 100.000000% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%

Hi list! I'm trying to setup a new * server with a TE210P in a Dell 2850 box. I'm using zaptel version 1.2.5, the linux flavour I'm using is CentOS 4. In a previous thread I read about the results I should expect from zttest. On my home box (using the crappy Asus A7V600) I got really bad results from zttest (just over 97.5) but I know that this motherboard just sucks. To my

Hello, Today we setted up a server that needs to use MeetMe but doesn't have any Zap hardware. So we need to use ztdummy (at least, this was our idea). Rarely: zttest is not working at all (100% bad, using zttest -v doesn't give anything, etc.). Of course, after load ztdummy, there isn't any background or anything. It is the same kernel (Debian Etch default kernel, 2.6.18) than

Hi, I have a TDM400P running with only one FXO port running on a VIA EPIA MS10000 (1Ghz Via Eden). When I run zttest from Zaptel 1.2.1 it hang and when I interrupt it with Ctrl-C that is the result: ?anyone have some idea about why isn't working? Some additional info: # /usr/src/zaptel/zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... --- Results after 0 passes --- Best:

Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but all that I get is: [root@SIP2-MI zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%

Our asterisk system gains access to the PSTN through a voip provider. We have no digium or other telephony hardware in our system. Do the zttest results still matter to us? Our results were as follows: --- Results after 1007 passes --- Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.780273 -- Average: 99.975763

Hi. Download pwlib, openh323 Janus-patch at http://www.inaccessnetworks.com/projects/asterisk-oh323/Libraries Refer how to compile http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg86875.html Cheers. Kim. > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:42:25 +0100 > From: Cesar Garcia <cesar.garcia@idecnet.com> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] oh323 driver compiling

I've made some modifications to zttest in order to use it as a frame clock accuracy tester / slip detector. I'm not certain if that was it's original purpose, but it seems that a lot of folks try to use it that way. The result is something that I'm calling ztclock for now to help avoid confusion. I'm including the source at the end of this post. You can compile it by placing

Hello All, I recently put in a zaptel 1fxo/1fxs card. I am experiencing heavy static. Even with the pots line disconnected, if I do a dial I still get static. This way I know it's not the line, but rather something on the card. I tried alternate pci slots. This card has a power connector, does anyone know what the power requirements are? The unit is in a small case with a 2.4ghz p-4 and

I am having trouble with zttest on a Tyan board, dual AMD Opteron's on FC3. Tried different kernels, no IRQ sharing, everything looks in order. My zaptel modules load fine, but if I run zttest, it just hangs. Below is the strace output and you can see where it stops. Anyone have any ideas? [root@asterisktest zaptel]# strace ./zttest execve("./zttest", ["./zttest"],

Hi all, I'm unable to complete the installation of zaptel. I did a checkout today from cvs. When I do make clean; make install. It gives me an error at this portion of the installation: /include/linux/modversions.h -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -c wct4xxp.c cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -c -o ztcfg.o ztcfg.c cc -c -fPIC -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE

Hello! While performing some zttest's for some time today, I was also keeping an eye of a top of the machine. While the zttest was running, I also had a ssh-keygen and a dd creating a 5GB file on an EXT3 partition running. I noticed that for the most part, I got a decent number of 100%'s, and a bunch of 99.6%'s or higher. However, it seems that whenever the zttest dropped

Hi I am trying to build reliable fax solution with asterisk, iaxmodem and hylafax. I am attempting to do this on Compaq DL-360 with 2 pentium 3 1.2GHz (512 cache) and 2GB of RAM. I am using a Sangoma A101. After installing the newest zaptel and wanpipe-3.1.0 beta I did zttest and it didn't give me good results: 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%

I have a P3-800 with two IDE drives in a software RAID1 configuration. Each drive is on a separate IDE channel. Now anytime there is HD activity, I hear "beeps" and "cutting out" on a call using the X100P card. I ran the zttest program, and discovered HD activity would drop the accuracy down to between 2% and 50%. However I noticed if I disabled one drive in the RAID1

Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [root@mollendo ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples

Hello, I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64. linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%

I have some DID numbers that come into Asterisk via PRI, then connect to a Panasonic DBS PBX via PRI. Outbound calls from the PBX go out via PRI to Asterisk, then out to the Telco's PRI. The sync LEDs on my PBX show that it is synced to Asterisk via the PRI. I have users complaining about random hangups. What is the best way toi approach finding the issue? ref: zttest looks good. ./zttest

> They instantly got us to look at the output of zttest and we found that this was (in their words) 'extremely low', with 'best' and > 'worst' readings of 99.975586% and 99.963379% respectively. Might want to give PCI latency setting a try, it helped for me. My ZTTEST would drop occasionally to 99.95% until I set: setpci -v -s 01:01.0 latency_timer=ff

I am having a problem with asterisk not being stable enough for production use. I have two cards, the digium TE406P, and the TE410P. The TE410P is the primary card that I am using but I would like to move to the TE406P for the echo cancellation and more flexibility of PCI slots available. General config info: 3 PRIs, configured as such: span=1,2,0,esf,b8zs span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs

Friends, I'm having severe problems with zaptel timers on Intel Dual Core systems with SMP code enabled. Ztdummy, zaptel connected to Digium TDM or PRI cards - all ends up with large timer probems - zttest going down to 50% accuracy on some systems, even to -1 on ztdummy systems and voice quality is no more. A restart is the only way to get back to a working system. We're only