similar to: Queue "abandon" count increments incorrectly?

Hi Gabriel, Yes this information is shown in real-time and also in historical reports with the OrderlyStats system. OrderlyStats is now available as a Server Edition you can download and install yourself, as well as the FREE managed service. You can get it at http://www.orderlyq.com/statistics.html Hope this helps, Matt. Gabriel Ortiz wrote: Hi all, Is there a way to get the time

Hello everyone, I've just upgraded from 1.6.1.9 to 1.6.2.13. I have noticed that (after the upgrade) abandoned calls within the Queue produce no cdr at all. I am using unanswered = no (the default) in cdr.conf. The call shows, as expected, in the queue_log as ABANDON The dialplan is: Ringing(); Answer(); // need to answer or no music! goto

I've got another issue I can't quite figure out and a search of the archives and Google turn up nothing... Say a call comes in (these are all via SIP) and is sent into a Queue(myqueue,t,,,300). Note the "t" to allow whomever receives the call to transfer it. The call is enqueued, and the logged in agents ring as expected. An agent answers the call, and begins chatting. He

Dear all, I have a data frame of three columns, which I have sorted by Latitude as follows: > test2[60:80,] Latitude Longitude Sim_1986 61948 85.25 -29.25 2.175345 61957 85.25 -28.75 8.750486 61967 85.25 -28.25 33.569305 61977 85.25 -27.75 23.702572 61988 85.25 -27.25 26.488602 62000 85.25 -26.75 23.915724 62012 85.25 -26.25 25.055082 62027

I went to run my queue_log parser so that I could send out a monthly report to one of my customers, and I noticed that every valid call complete action (COMPLETEAGENT, COMPLETECALLER) is followed by an ABANDON: Here is a complete-caller: 1123325015|1123325011.2|mainq|NONE|ENTERQUEUE||00110102102 1123325020|1123325011.2|mainq|Agent/21|CONNECT|5

I am getting to my wits end with these phones (and so is my boss). I am getting an random echo on these phones and I have an issue opened with Polycom and its been in their research and development department for almost a month with no results. I have noticed that I get a message "RFC3389 support incomplete. Turn off on client if possible" in asterisk. I have researched this and made

> > Sorry, of course cdr.conf not queues.conf. marcus > > Am 01.12.2010 19:16 schrieb "marcus rothe" <synco16 at googlemail.com>: > > > Hi Rodrigo, have you got enabled the appropriate line in queues. Conf? > Regards Marcus > > Thanks very much, I include the line "unansweredy=yes" in the cdr.conf and solve the problem. Thanks again! --

Hi Hal, On Tuesday 01 October 2013 06:22 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi Hal, >> >> >> Our Architecture has indirect move instruction which increments >> the >> pointer implicitly and the target only has i8 type values. So the >> load >> of i16 will be converted to two i8 target loads wherein after the

----- Original Message ----- > Hi Hal, > > > Our Architecture has indirect move instruction which increments > the > pointer implicitly and the target only has i8 type values. So the > load > of i16 will be converted to two i8 target loads wherein after the > first > load instruction, the pointer to the first i8 address will > automatically >

Hi I'm using Ast 1.0.3, and managing a Queue for ACD. Our Callcenter supervisor uses Flash Operator Panel to see status of the Queue, and logged in Agents. All calls that stay to long in the Queue gets into a Voicemail, in order to have customer leave a message. 1. I see the Queue has a Completed and Abandoned counter. I have not found a exact definition of these, besides the obvius ones.

Hi Hal, Our Architecture has indirect move instruction which increments the pointer implicitly and the target only has i8 type values. So the load of i16 will be converted to two i8 target loads wherein after the first load instruction, the pointer to the first i8 address will automatically increment to point to the next i8 value. So the post increment nature is in the Target. A normal

I'm relatively new to LLVM so apologies in advance if this is a dumb question. I've been experimenting with re-targeting LLVM onto a 16-bit micro which has pre and post increment and decrement addressing modes. I've been using llvm-gcc to generate llvm bitcode and llvm 2.7 to go from here to my target assembly code. I've got the Combine pass to deal with

Author: mcpowers Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 15e96f4c6276c8742d81985eb84de4a8effe208c Log message: 6363872 AES counter mode increments wrong counter bits on i386 Files: update: usr/src/common/crypto/aes/aes_cbc_crypt.c update: usr/src/uts/common/crypto/io/aes.c

So I get a phone call about my companie's controler not being able to log into samba. About two weeks ago we migrated from Win2k Server to Samba running on LDAP. What would be the default value that sambaPwdMustChange would be incremented? This is NT Time Right (1 unit for every 100 ms from 1600 right?) I just had to bump everybody what I'm guessing is three weeks, but I need to know

I need to increment cells of a matrix (collusionM). The indexes to increment are in an index (matchIndex). This is some of the code for (j in 1:(rows-1)) matchIndex[[j]] <- which(mx[j]==mx) for (j in 1:(rows-1)) collisionM[j,matchIndex[[j]]] <- collisionM[j,matchIndex[[j]]] + 1 I could put them in the same loop but this is slower. The first for statement is fine. It finds the matches

I have had the same problem: Shared files, not owned by the user in question, were being deleted and re-written upon saving the file. Because Excel only gives user (not group) permission, it will muck up access for other users in the group. In my case, I was not enforcing anything (when the problem occurred) and my .conf only had the bare minimum of information, I also used method 3, but put a

----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > We have an architecture where the indirect move instruction > implicitly increments the pointer > value after the move. We have Instruction format and pattern for this > type of instructions. > > How to encode the information that the pointer is incremented? As you seem to be aware, LLVM has patterns specifically to match

I have found the following regarding this problem: 1. It occurs only on files that (a) the user does not own AND (b) samba is forcing write permissions on (e.g. with the "force group" or "force create mode"). 2. Problem does *not* occur when "force create mode" and similar are left out of share definition, and you rely on the default standard 644 file modes and 755

To do framebuffer updates, one needs memcpy from system memory and a pointer-increment function. Add both interfaces with documentation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> --- include/linux/dma-buf-map.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h

To do framebuffer updates, one needs memcpy from system memory and a pointer-increment function. Add both interfaces with documentation. v5: * include <linux/string.h> to build on sparc64 (Sam) Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org> Tested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org> ---