similar to: HDLC/Zaptel/Kernel 2.6.11(.9)

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

Hello All, I am battling a problem I don't know how to fix... Here is the scenario: Fractionated T1 with 1-6 channels voice, 21-24 channels data. Comes into a box with Digium T100P, splits off data channes with HDLC, to devicec pvc0, This works fine, but I have a routing problem getting to my machines! Here is the current set up... sethdlc hdlc0 fr lmi ansi sethdlc hdlc0 create 44

Hello all, My set up is a fractionated t1, with 1-6 voice channels, 21-24 data channels. I have a t100P installed in a amd 1500 with 512meg. Question: In order to set up the data channels, is the following correct? 1) compile new kernel with generic hdlc support 2) compile hdlc from hq.pm.waw.pl/hdlc 3) uncomment KFLAGS+=DConfig_ZAPATA_NET in zaptel makefile 4) compile zaptel, 5 compile rest

Hello all, We have a TE405P set up with span 1 running to a channel bank, a PRI running into span 2, and a PPP internet T1 running into span 3. We have the first 2 spans up and running without a problem. We have hdlc compiled into the kernel and after making the appropriate changes to zaptel.conf and loading the zaptel, wct4xxp, and hldc modules we can bring up the third span with the internet

I got it figured out now. In case anyone else comes across it - this is what I had to do: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 up ***NO IP INFO SET*** Sethdlc hdlc0 create <dlci number> Ifconfig pvc0 <local ip> pointopoint <remote ip> up Then set your default gateway to the <remote ip> listed in pvc0. That's about it!! Hope it helps! -----Original

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

Hi List, I am sorry that I may bring the old question to the community. My question is 1. How can we determine if asterisk is working normally or not ? what kind watchdog process do we have at this moment ? 2. In case the running asterisk is mulfucntion, is there any available way to auto restart asterisk ?? Please advise if you could. Thanks.

Hello everyone, We have recently turned up a new T1 from McLeod (Midwestern CLEC). It is configured like so: /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=us defaultzone=us span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs ;(also tried 1,1,0,esf,b8zs) bchan=13-23 nethdlc=1-12 dchan=24 /etc/zapata.conf: switchtype=national context=pri-in signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel => 13-23 I can get hdlc0 (and pvc0) up just fine after the

I'm setting up a T1 for both voice and data and was wanting to know the steps involved. I've recompiled zaptel for ZAPATA_NET support and setup my /etc/zaptel.conf: Fxsks=1-10 Nethdlc=11-24 Modprobe wct1xxp works fine and my voice lines work. Now when I use the provided sethdlc, I use the following commands: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 <ipaddress> <network>

I have my Linux 2.6 kernel with the necessary HDLC config and also recompiled zaptel accordingly. On modprobe, I get: Found a Wildcard: Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2000 in_atomic():0[expected: 0], irqs_disabled():1 [<0211e605>] __might_sleep+0x82/0x8c [<02144643>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0x57 [<42ad7a2c>]

Hello, I contacted Krzysztof Halasa, the maintainer of the current sethdlc code. This is the response he gave me. Of course, I have this working now. Still some minor configuration to do, but It does work, and the connections to the internet are _much_ faster than when I went through the adtran... I would highly recommend to anyone with a fractionated T1, with data and voice channels to

Hello! I want to use TE121 for E1 data link to cisco. Really only for tests now. So I wrote: span = 1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 #span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-31:hdlc0 may be first line is wrong, problem is somewhere else anyway. Just because I get: # dahdi_cfg DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Function not implemented (38) This is centos 6.4 box with dahdi 2.7.0.1. Could you tell me is it

Greetings- I'm wondering if the Digium PRI cards can be used for data (Cisco HDLC, PPP, etc) or if they're for voice circuits only. I haven't been able to find any information on this. All documentation direct from Digium seems to indicate their hardware is for voice applications only. Sangoma's cards work in either voice or data mode but of course this is configured in their

Hey gang, I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1. I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table: [root@asterisk root]# route

Hello, I am experiencing what may be a unique problem with operating the bridge. My hardware is custom Freescale MPC875 processor based with one ethernet (eth0) and one hdlc (hdlc0) WAN port and I am connecting two of these boards together using the WAN ports over a long distance - essentially two bridges in series. They are running Linux 2.6.15 with bridging enabled in the kernel

Hello, After reading the excellent HOWTO I got traffic shaping working nicely over ethernet devices on a test setup. I can''t put this setup live though, because our main firewall has three 2mbit hdlc interfaces instead of a single device. We are using multipath routing using iproute2 nexthop at the moment, and that works fine for firewalling. But now I have a need for shaping and

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:43:30 +0700 <arkady-parabel@ngs.ru> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using a powerpc-based board (CPU - Motorolla 82855, 50 > Mhz) with 32 Mb of RAM, Big Endian. > Linux kernel - 2.4.22, bridge - statically linked & as a > module > brctl - 0.9.6 > Ethernet - fec (arch/ppc/8xx_io/fec.c) > All this was compiled with gcc version 3.2.2 20030217

Yesterday I started using CBQ in production on our firewall over an IMQ device, but since then I get a lot of messages in my syslog like below: On Wednesday 13 November 2002 09:07, root@ism.nl wrote: > Nov 13 08:01:36 firewall kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed. > Nov 13 08:12:36 firewall kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed. > Nov 13 08:18:36 firewall kernel: NET: 1 messages

Hi, I believe the issues raised by this message are the same as mine, more on a commercial sense than for self use, but mostly the same. I've seen posts where real-life installations are mentioned, but not a reference to how Asterisk is working on production (and productive) environments. Any experiences would be very welcome I believe, not only on pure technical, but wider, sense. Thanks

Hi, I am facing problem in configuring D-channel. I did the following configuration for TE-120P card /etc/zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf group=1 signalling=pri_cpe switchtype=euroisdn context=incoming channel=1-15,17-31 DIGIUM card is connected through cable to another end.On placing call from other end to