similar to: rspec hangs when used with QtRuby

Just in case some of you missed it, Pragmatic Programmers just published their first of a series of short, PDF-only books. This one is on qtRuby. It would be great to have something like this for wxRuby. I don''t think wxRuby is quite ready to this (yet), but I thought I''d plant the idea. Curt ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com>

Hey, Luke doesn''t seem to be able to open a Ferret index I''ve created. Is this expected? If yes, can someone recommend another index inspection tool? Thanks, John

At the current time, the environment is using qt3 values, as in $ env | grep QT QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt-3.3 QTINC=/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include QTLIB=/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib $ env | grep PATH PATH=/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/home/pauljohn/bin I also have QT4 installed, and I want programs to find those libraries and include files instead of these ones.

Hello, Has anyone tested QtRuby? I''m doing a small OpenGL application http://www.discretizer.org and just want to know the arguments for staying with fxruby. This is what I have discovered: Pros: -Fxruby seems to have a very nice OpenGL support (FXGLViewer) which is what I really need. -Nice looks. No unnecessary theming support. -Very fast and light on system resources. Cons: -No

Cross-posted to the blog (at http://lylejohnson.name/blog/2010/08/04/moving-on/): When Jamis Buck wrote last year about ceasing development on Capistrano, his post really struck a chord with me. If this post reminds you of that one, it''s because I re-read it before sitting down to compose this one. It was the next best thing to having Jamis on hand to give me a pep talk before I had to

It looks like you just assumed too much. kde-config has a specific include dir query. I am now hitting some dbus problems, but it does not seem to be related. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: kdefix.patch.bz2 Type: application/x-bzip Size: 604 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Hi, I was just wondering, is there a "correct" or "preferred" way of setting up the path and other environment variables for Qt 4 development/build using qmake and all - on a CentOS 6 system? I mean, this does not work out-of-the box, at least if you have build files that assume "qmake" may be executed just like that - as there is no Qt 4 qmake on the path,

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0780 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0780.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f5a3bfd84a7225cfc366e2af24313ed9bec6ffbab90497fbe3bb58bbd9649a62 avahi-0.6.25-12.el6_5.1.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1140 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1140.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c05c0eb98850d7593eec0089f6d64c2a81df5bdf2e0cce873cc1b4666dee1191 avahi-0.6.25-12.el6_5.3.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1663 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1663.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2da08ce1a4e3ab757f29c482bc187f630bd756c987d9c7d084b9778e7a4f7277 avahi-0.6.25-15.el6_8.1.i686.rpm

At install I had Gnome and Not KDE. doing rpm -qa | grep qt results in qt-3.3.6-23.el5 qt4-4.2.1-1 How can I find out what package loaded the qt4 and qt? Thanks, Jerry

Hi! It seems that i made some changes that make xconfig to not work .. the problem is that not matter what QTDIR i select i receive the same errors that start with : adrian at sevcenco: linux-2.6.37 $ make O=/home/adrian/kernel/kernel_out xconfig GEN /home/adrian/kernel/kernel_out/Makefile HOSTCXX scripts/kconfig/qconf.o /usr/lib64/qt4/include/Qt3Support/q3toolbar.h:45: error:

Hi, A quick question from a beginner: does it make sense to build the UI of a rails application with Qt, instead of bulding a web application? The idea would be to reuse parts of rails (like ActiveRecords) to write the logic on the server, and build the (complex) UI faster, with a client-based framework. On the client, ruby *could* be used too, since QtRuby exists. Your reactions are more than

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:0183 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0183.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: d9e301f787f9d52204a111af639f106c559c08a8e87a2354e3261d890a578db6 avahi-0.6.31-15.el7_2.1.i686.rpm

Hi all, Initially I thought this was a bug in the built-in mocking framework(and it still may be), but I better hash it out on the mailing list before I file/reopen the ticket: http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/478-mocks-on-constants#ticket-478-6 I thought my example illustrated my problem, but obviously I was passing the wrong arguments to the mock. I revised my example to

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Having just upgraded my system from CentOS 4.4 to 5.0, I'm a bit disappointed that I still can't install skype from the skype repo using yum - when I try yum install skype, I end up with: libsigc++20-2.0.17-1.el5. 100% |=========================| 217 kB 00:13 ---> Package libsigc++20.i386 0:2.0.17-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing

I saw in one of Dave C.''s comments to a ticket that "our current plan is to deprecate the mocking framework." I hadn''t heard anything about that, but then again I haven''t paid super close attention to the list. Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using Mocha (or any other framework one might want to plug in?). Pat

Hello, I have a patch that: 1. Allows gccld to link shared libraries natively.. 2. Passes along -rpath and -soname to the native linker... 3. Fixes a bug where the bytecode files were kept around after native linking... 4. Removes a now unnecessary warning for native linking... The result is that we are >' '< close to having Qt4 both compile *and* link with the LLVM toolchain.

Hi, I''ve been reading with interest the threads trying to integrate Mocha and Stubba with RSpec. So far, I''ve made the two changes in spec_helper.rb suggested, but discovered another one that neither of the archives mentions: If you use traditional mocking: object = mock or the stub shortcut : object = stub(:method => :result), you run into namespace conflicts with