Julian Sikorski napisa?(a):> Julian Sikorski napisa?(a):
>> David Reveman napisa?(a):
>>> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>>> Julian Sikorski napisa?(a):
>>>>> Julian Sikorski napisa?(a):
>>>>>> It looks like you just assumed too much. kde-config has
a specific
>>>>>> include dir query. I am now hitting some dbus problems,
but it does not
>>>>>> seem to be related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> compiz mailing list
>>>>>> compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
>>>>> Well, it seems I won't be able to get this working...
With the attached
>>>>> patch (as suggested in the dbus.h) I was able to get a bit
further, but
>>>>> compilation still blows in the face:
>>>>> decorator.h:167: error: 'DBusQt' has not been
declared
>>>>> decorator.h:167: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of
'Connection' with
>>>>> no type
>>>>> decorator.h:167: error: expected ';' before
'mDBusQtConnection'
>>>>> Does standard dbus define this function? Or shall I have
some additional
>>>>> headers installed? Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> compiz mailing list
>>>>> compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
>>>> Are these patches wrong? I know they don't solve the
building problem
>>>> entirely due to the fact kwd is using an obsolete version of
DBusQT
>>>> which is a bit hard to find, but at least the headers location
is
>>>> detected properly. The dbus fix was made according to the
comment in the
>>>> header:
>>>>
>>>> #if !defined (DBUS_INSIDE_DBUS_H) && !defined
(DBUS_COMPILATION)
>>>> #error "Only <dbus/dbus.h> can be included directly,
this file may
>>>> disappear or change contents."
>>>>
>>>> There is a backport of qt4 dbus, which is not discouraged by
upstream
>>>> and can be downloaded here:
>>>>
>>>> http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/dbus-qt4-qt3backport/
>>>> http://www.sbox.tugraz.at/home/v/voyager/dbus-1-qt3-0.2.tar.bz2
>>> Ok, I guess we should depend on dbus-1-qt3 until we can move to
qt4. Do
>>> you know which is the first version of dbus that doesn't
include qt
>>> bindings? We can change so either an old version of dbus with qt
>>> bindings or dbus-1-qt3 is required.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>> Well, I'm not quite sure, but judging from the NEWS, ChangeLog and
cvs
>> log, It would be either or 0.90. qt subdirectory was removed from qt
>> source at Fri Jul 14 16:20:11 2006 UTC.
>> _______________________________________________
>> compiz mailing list
>> compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
>>
> I meant 0.90, of course. Anyway, someone with more knowledge in the
> matter should tell.
>
I found that in fedora extras cvs:
As of dbus-0.90, all the bindings were split out from the main tarball.
An unfortunate consequence of this was that dbus-qt was dropped
completely. dbus-qt4 bindings will be contained within qt4-4.2.0
So it looks like the last version to include old qt bindings is indeed 0.62.