similar to: Unable to load module for TE406P

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Unable to load module for TE406P"

2005 Aug 16
0
Solved: Unable to load module for TE406P
It works out that name "Unified t4xxp/t2xxp driver" is not accepted anymore by 2.6.13 kernel. Need to remove "/" for it to load properly > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Boris Bakchiev > Sent: Monday, 15 August 2005 18:17 > To:
2005 Sep 11
5
TE406p no interrupts
Hi, I've installed an TE406p, asterisk1.2 on tyan opteron board. After installation there is no interrupts from TE406p. Is this board stable? Should i change * version to 1.0.9? Regards, Jason __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
2006 Mar 22
1
Stability and motherboard questions with TE406P and TE410P
I am having a problem with asterisk not being stable enough for production use. I have two cards, the digium TE406P, and the TE410P. The TE410P is the primary card that I am using but I would like to move to the TE406P for the echo cancellation and more flexibility of PCI slots available. General config info: 3 PRIs, configured as such: span=1,2,0,esf,b8zs span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs
2005 Sep 01
1
TE406P seg fault on Stable
I received a TE406P card from Digium yesterday and have done several tests on it and cannot get it working reliably with any Stable release or even CVS v1.0. What are other people that are using the TE406P card using for an Asterisk version? I tried 1.2.0 beta1 and it seemed to function well except for an unrelated issue with the beta release where the manager interface chokes under
2005 Sep 06
3
TE406P audio drops
Hello, Now that we've had our new Digium TE406P card in production for 4 days we have discovered audio drop problems that happen randomly across all channels. Here's more about our setup: P4-3.2GHz 2GB ram Slackware Linux 10.1 with custom kernel 2.4.29 Asterisk 1.2beta1 Digium TE406P quad T1 card with the following attached: - 2 x RBS D4/AMI 24 channel T1s - 1 x RBS B8ZS/ESF 24 channel
2006 Feb 01
2
TE411P or TE406P
Hi Guys, I need your recommendation which card to buy?The TE411P or TE406P do they have any difference?I check their brochures they are differ only when it comes to PCI slot voltages.Which card best to use?Btw,Il be using supermicro board with 3.3V and 5.5V?Will il be experiencing problem during the implementation later on if i choose the wrong PCI voltage options?Will it depends on
2006 Jan 05
1
fax detection on TE406P
Hi all, I am having problems detecting fax on a client site using the TE406P (card with echo cancellation module) under 1.2 and was wondering if anybody was having or has had similar problems? Currently I can not get the system to detect fax for love nor money, in zapata.conf the relevant entries are set to: faxdetect=outgoing and I have a fax extension in the necessary context. I have taken
2006 Jan 20
1
Can TE406P provide PRI to other VoIP gateways?
Hi, Does anyone know if it's possible to have 1 port of TE406P to provide T1 PRI to other VoIP gateways? I am trying to provide T1 PRI to one of our old Clarent gateways to integrate it to Asterisk. Can anyone help? Thank you. Andy
2005 Jul 24
2
success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional "edgy" echo and
2006 May 24
2
TE406P - MFC/R2
Guys, I'm trying to configure a TE406P with MFC/R2. here goes my zaptel.conf: span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 cas=1-15:1101 dchan=16 cas=17-31:1101 span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 cas=32-46:1101 dchan=47 cas=48-62:1101 The first strange behavior is that the: zap show status shows this: Description Alarms IRQ bpviol CRC4 T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 1
2005 Oct 05
2
TE411P and TE406P stability
I am getting ready to purchase my first Digium card to start experimenting with Asterisk. Before I make my purchase, I wanted to make sure I'm not going to have issues with these cards (need to see what the specs are on my box, 5V or 3.3V PCI ). I will be using Asterisk @ Home, so will be Asterisk v1.0.9. I took a quick poke at the lists, and it appears several people have been having
2005 Jan 24
1
AVM Fritz crash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Not strictly Asterisk related, but I'm trying to get an AVM Fritz! card to work with Asterisk on a Fedora Core 3 box. I've grabbed the official AVM Fritz CAPI driver from the AVM website and compiled against the current kernel. However, as soon as I modprobe it I get: CAPI Subsystem Rev 1.1.2.8 fcpci: module license 'Proprietary'
2006 Jun 15
6
FAX + Digium + SpanDSP
Hi, Anyone using SpanDSP with Digium TDM o TE cards to receive and email Faxes? Thanks, Javier Ergas R. Director General de Tecnolog?a Pibix Telefon?a IP http://www.pibix.cl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060615/ed77e5d1/attachment.htm
2006 Jun 20
10
TE420P/TE415P?
Hi, I just read a pressrelease from VON that Digium will soon be releaseing a couple of new cards. What got me interested was: "The TE420P and TE415P support 128ms of G.168 (2002)-compliant echo cancellation across their entire 128 channels." Does anyone know when thease will be released and what they will cost when released? Thanks!
2005 Sep 10
1
PRI echo
Hi, My configuration is pri----*(te405p)---iaxclient. My * version is 1.0.7 running on tyan dual opteron board. I have several problems. 1) inbound echo For outbound call(iaxclient-->pri), there is almost no echo. But for inbound(pri-->iaxclient), I can hear distinct echo. Can Sangoma a104 or digium te406p help this problem? 2)Today i received te406p. I know T1/E1 jumper. But how can i
2007 Feb 09
6
The High Performance Echo Canceller (HPEC)
I recently read about the following new technologies from Digium. Has anyone tried the new HPEC or knows when it will be available? TDM800P and HPEC The TDM800P is an 8-port analog telephony interface card, so it fills the gap between Digium's 4-port and 24-port cards. Analog phones and POTS lines are going to be with us for some time, and demand for support for them remains high. The
2017 Sep 01
0
Xen CentOS 7.3 server + CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot after CR updates (applied to VM)!
On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: > A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot > after applying CR updates: <snip> > Server OS is CentOS 7.3 using Xen (no CR updates): > rpm -qa xen\* > xen-hypervisor-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 > xen-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 > xen-licenses-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 > xen-libs-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 >
2017 Sep 04
0
Xen CentOS 7.3 server + CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot after CR updates (applied to VM)!
On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >>> A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot >>> after applying CR updates: >> <snip> >>> Server OS is CentOS 7.3 using Xen (no CR updates): >>> rpm -qa xen\* >>>
2017 Sep 05
0
Xen CentOS 7.3 server + CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot after CR updates (applied to VM)!
On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >>>>> A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot >>>>> after applying CR updates:
2005 Apr 11
2
help please.
I know this isn''t a shorewall question, but I hope somebody might be able to point me the right direction. here''s the error: Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: modprobe/11068 Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: caller is ip_conntrack_init+0x255/0x369 [ip_conntrack] Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: [<c02ec398>]