similar to: LDAP search application for Asterisk

Hi, all. I am building a SER+asterisk PBX airming at around 10k persons' usage. For authentication purpose I am in favor of ldap storage, while I am not sure the current ldap module for asterisk(0.9.9.2) is stable enough? sorry I do not master the proper testing mechanisms to find out myself. Thanks in advance.

I have just bought several Sipura SPA-841 SIP phones, and after some testing I have found out that the volume received by other parties when calling using the handset is very low. I've been able to reproduce this problem in the 3 phones I've tested so far. I've tried tweaking several configuration options but nothing I has helped so far. Has anybody else experienced this problem?

What is everyone using in Asterisk 1.6.x to retrieve data from LDAP. The version of app_ldap I have only works with Asterisk 1.4.x http://www.mezzo.net/asterisk/app_ldap-2.0rc1.tgz Without a way to get data from LDAP stop me from using Asterisk 1.6.x Regards David. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

are you giving answer()? ..o-------------------------------------------------------o.. Brian Fertig Network/Systems Engineer IT Administrator Planet Telecom, Inc. Tampa,FL Office -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Juan Jose Comellas Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:32 AM To: Asterisk Users

I am using Asterisk (Debian unstable packages) with an OH323 connection to my provider. Everything is working except for the generation of ringback tones when I receive inbound calls from the PSTN. My provider tells me that we're sending call progress indications and that because of this they're expecting us to generate the ringback tone. Does anybody know how to configure this in

Hello, I've found this information about asterisk and LDAP: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+LDAP which can be out of date. I'm trying this http://www.mezzo.net/asterisk/app_ldap.html however I'm facing the same problems as this unanswered: http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?p=42591&sid=05e1d00ab6f9848f4e7b6 39d66cc6d79 Does anybody know how to solve this

We intend to use Asterisk with a very large dialplan (with a lot of functionality for 3000+ users). Each user will be able to change several of his parameters in the dialplan, so we will be forced to reload the diaplan constantly. Has anybody else any previous experience with a similar installation? There are some things that we'd like to know, if anybody can help us. These are: - Is

Hello everybody, for all of you that have searched for a real fax solution, look no further. We now have T38 faxing. Please contact me for more information. Thanks Michael D. Schelin ShellTel 626-814-2354

I'm having some trouble dialing phone numbers in Argentina with Digium Zaptel cards. Does anyone have some sample configuration that works with Digium TDM04B cards in Argentina? I'm mainly referring to the /etc/zaptel.conf and /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf. I have two Zaptel cards: the first one has 1 FXS port and 3 FXO ports; the second one has 4 FXO ports. My current configuration is

Is there anyone who is currently using Asterisk as a production H323 gateway? And using which combination of asterisk and H323 (chan_h323, chan_oh323?) The main issue is interoperability with other H323 parties (Cisco AS53xx, Nextone, etc). Searching the mailing list it seems that both h323 and oh323 are not so stable, is it only an impression or using h323 is really not so advisable?

Here is the pre-pre-pre alpha of the file, llease be kind <g> I give up on TableGen... cannot build the flex/bison emitted files ;-( With my hacked version of the checkout the script build Fibonacci.exe and HowToUseJIT.exe among with the proper libraries. I included also a demo version of the HowToUseJIT Visual studio project generated by the script. You can debug the program in the

On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 12:19, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > Here is the pre-pre-pre alpha of the file, llease be kind <g> > > I give up on TableGen... cannot build the flex/bison emitted files ;-( > With my hacked version of the checkout the script build Fibonacci.exe > and HowToUseJIT.exe among with the proper libraries. > > I included also a demo version of the

I don't want to drive this too off topic, but I should be clear that I wasn't suggesting that the LLVM project adopt XPJ as it's official config file format for Visual Studio. I have found it useful to use XPJ to generate the initial VS projects for a code base that doesn't already have VS projects. I also find it nice to be able to see all of the config options in a

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 10:22 -0500, Christopher Lamb wrote: > I don't want to drive this too off topic, but I should be clear that I > wasn't suggesting that the LLVM project adopt XPJ as it's official > config file format for Visual Studio. I have found it useful to use > XPJ to generate the initial VS projects for a code base that doesn't > already have VS projects.

Hi Oscar, On 30-Jul-08, at 9:41 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > 1. General LLVM users: Are you so happy with `configure' and hand-made > makefiles that you wont consider an alternative? If you are > interested, > I can steer my work to cover all platforms. We (RapidMind) are very interested. We would very much like to see a unified build system across MSVC/Windows and gcc/Linux/OS

>From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:20:39 +0200 > >I'm using scons to generate that files from .in files. I implemented in it >the configure check regarding iterators, hash and so on... >something like: > Hey, you've found the tool that makes it possible to generically reading Makefiles... Cool - The tool I've

I've been using SCons as the build tool for my frontend application, and I'm getting to the point where it would be useful to create a custom scanner for my generated bitcode files so that SCons can do proper dependency analysis. At the moment, SCons has no way to know which source files a particular bitcode file depends on, so the only way to do a "correct" build is to

[Repost: The mailing list was down yesterday. Sorry if this is a duplicate] I'm evaluating CMake (1) primarily as an alternative build system for Visual Studio users, although it can easily be a replacement for `configure' and hand-made makefiles too, providing a single build system for all platforms. CMake is a tool that takes a project description and configures, generates makefiles,

Stefanus Du Toit <sdt at rapidmind.com> writes: [snip] > We have considered contributing such a build system, and if we were to > do so would probably base it on SCons (http://www.scons.org/) because > we already use SCons extensively. At first, SCons is what I intended too. But then I read about the KDE experience and took the safe route :-) [snip] > Are you intending

Hi I'm trying to compile HowToUseJIT.cpp, but it seems that iterator definition is missing: --------------------Configuration: HowToUseJIT - Win32 Debug-------------------- Compiling... HowToUseJIT.cpp c:\sfu\usr\local\src\llvm\include\llvm\adt\ilist(41) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'llvm/ADT/iterator': No such file or directory Error executing cl.exe. I've