similar to: IAX with shaw cable not going through

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 13:17 -0700, Matthew Asham wrote: > For what it's worth I use a residential Shaw connection and have no > problems with IAX registration nor SIP to our Asterisk PBX elsewhere on > the 'net. When I had a dynapic IP connection with shaw, there was not problem either. I just changed to static and IAX can not connect. How can I test it? iax2 show registry Host

Is anyone using this combination successfully? I have a dell 500sc running rh9 and asterisk 1.0rc1. It is configured with an x100p. I have a Sipura SPA-2000, laptop with Xlite and a Grandstream Budgetone BT-101. I have signed up with Voipjet (they use iax2). I also have an FWD number via iax2. I can sucessfully call back and forth to all devices via zap, sip, and fwd. I can successfully

How do I solve the problem with between patterns: _1800 _1NXX I would like all numbers 1800, 1877 etc to go through iaxtel but all other numbers 1xxx via voipjet Example in my extension.conf I have: [iaxtel] exten => _1700NXXXXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/xxxx:xxxxx@iaxtel.com/${EXTEN}@iaxtel) exten => _1888NXXXXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/xxxx:xxxxx@iaxtel.com/${EXTEN}@iaxtel) exten =>

Got a problem: a user's workstation froze. He wound up rebooting, without calling me in first, so I dunno. But, and this is a show-stopper, when it came up, it came up with the firmware MAC, not the spoofed one. In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcg-eth0, I've got the spoofed MAC address, and a UUID. In the grub.conf, I've got net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0. But when I logged onto his

Anyone seen this before? ----- Forwarded message from ips at shaw.ca ----- X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BACKSCATTER autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: root at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca Delivered-To: root at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca

Hi, Thanks Zed - this is very interesting. One item in particular caught my eye: Does anyone on this list have any comments or validation that Rails 1.2.1 is 2-4 times as slow as Rails 1.1.6? Topfunky provided a link that purports what looks like really horrible performance and memory characteristics for Rails 1.2.1, even v. 1.1.6:

On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: >>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? >> >> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I >> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of >> their license for this software, whatever it may be? >> >> If

Dear List members- I am trying to configure ASTCC (Asterisk calling card application) but having a hard time to configure it properly. My project deadline is approaching and couldn't figure out how to make ASTCC functional. Here are some details what I have done so far. 1) I have installed ASTCC successfully. 2) I can access astcc-admin.cgi script without any problem. 3) I have created

We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of course, to boot the system. My manager found a way to allow us to reboot without being at the system's keyboard, a package called clevis. Works fine... except in a couple of very special cases. Those systems, the problem is that, due to older

I'm seeing strings of failed POP3 login attempts with obvious bogus usernames coming from different IP addresses. Today's originated from 216.31.146.19 (which resolves to neovisionlabs.com). This looks like a botnet attack. I got a similar probe a couple days ago. Is anyone else seeing these? The attack involves trying about 20 different names, about 3-4 seconds apart. Here's a

Or just set up sane firewall rules to allow the two to talk, but block external traffic. I have run this way for years - all add'rs ar IANA in a subnet block, and just that block is open locally, and all other external IP's severely restricted, and NUT works great . . . - Tim On September 12, 2016 11:47:28 AM CDT, "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart at gathman.org> wrote: >On

Is it me... or is it voipjet? This week I've been trying various providers, just can't seem to get voipjet to work. I signed up with voipjet but so far can't get it to work inbound or out bound. I always get 'all circuits busy'. May 12 22:27:05 VERBOSE[2442]: -- Executing [1;36;40mDial[0;37;40m("[1;35;40mSIP/101-ad89[0;37;40m",

On 7/8/20 10:02 AM, Ken Cox wrote: > > On 7/8/20 1:30 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: >> On 2020-07-06 10:01, Laine Stump wrote: >>> On 7/6/20 5:10 AM, Yalan Zhang wrote: >>>> Hi Laine, >>>> >>>> For the feature testing before, I only test the linux bridge setting as >>>> in 2), it works. >>>> Now I tried 1), to use

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> We've been required to encrypt h/ds, and so have been rolling that out >> over the last year or so. Thing is, you need to put in a password, of >> course, to boot the system. My manager found a way to allow us to reboot >> without being at the system's keyboard, a package called clevis.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Is there a way to prevent hwaddr/mac address spoofing between DomU''s? So in a way ''binding'' a mac-address on boot time with a virtual interface? (with something like ebtables/arptables/etc?) Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Following Situation: Having an intranet-application that needs to know the ip-Address of the clients before running. Clients anywere in the Internet with any ip-address. So I thought about using masquerading the opposite way than normal. But then anybody could use this application. Dos anybody know how to make it a little bit more secure, like proofing the mac-address of the client, or something

Tough to get a spoofed IP to actually route back to it's host though, so other than those unfortunate to be on a flat network, still not too much of an issue . . . - Tim On 09/12/2016 04:46 PM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Tim Dawson wrote: > >> Or just set up sane firewall rules to allow the two to talk, but block >> external traffic. I have run this

Hi, I have asterisk installed on centos with phpagi. Also I have PRI card connect to it. it's possible to show the sip number when calling from sip number to external number thru the PRI, instead of showing the PRI number show the sip number ? Regards -Hadi.Salem

I'm completely confused here and I'm hoping someone here has a setup they're willing to share, or help me configure things on my end. My connectivity is through Comcast, who unfortunately, does not offer ipv6 in my area. My connection goes like this: Comcast -> Motorola Surfboard Cable Router -> CentOS 6.5 server The CentOS server is multi-homed and manages the internal

Dear All: I have several boxes that up and running just great, then we changed internet equipment due to a lightning strike, now all my inbound IAX connections (iax2 show peers) have unknown status. If I log into the remote boxes, it says "Request sent." The authentications haven't changed at all, and all the iax.conf settings are correct. It looks like a firewall issue, but