similar to: Dell PowerEdge SC420 for Office Implementati on???

I was wondering how the Dell SC420 will perform under normal office to office communications. We would equip each server with a T1 card to make office to office SIP calls. They will integrate into our existing PBX systems. Does anyone on this list use this hardware currently???? Thanks!

We're using an SC420 and using BRI with a quadbri Junganns card, with IAX softphones and one hardphone. Working well except that we sometimes get dropped connections between IAX and the server with a max retries exceed message, which comes from the chan_iax driver code. The BRI side of things looks like it is fine. I had been thinking it might be a network issue but now wonder if it is an

Hi people I am new to Xen and having some trouble getting it up and running. I am trying to install it on a Dell Poweredge SC420 that has CentOS (RHEL3 clone) installed. The error that I am getting when I first try to boot into the Xen kernel, after having installed the binary and adding the necessary lines to grub.conf is : ---snip--- md: Autodetecting RAID arrays md: autorun ... md: ...

Hi, I have a Dell Poweredge SC420 and a SC430. The SC420 has an ICH6 chipset and works ok with Xen. The SC430 has an ICH7 chipset and the SATA detection fails. I''ve tried 2.6.11.10 and 2.6.12.5 kernels, with Xen 2.0.7, Xen-testing and Xen-unstable, all with the same results. I''m using the same hypervisor and kernel binaries, so problems with the compiler environment etc. have

Hi, I am attempting to connect my dell SC420 to a 32" LCD at 1366x768. I have attached my currect config file and currect X start log. How do I massage the xorf file to run at the native resolution of the LCD? It currently runs but is in a virtual mode. The screen scrolls. Any help is appreciated. I am using Centos 4.1. Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and

Juan, I am running a Calling Card application on a Dell PowerEdge 2850 with Asterisk 1.0.7. Recording conversations I have seen on my server causes the processors to burn more than necessary so I would recommend what William from Signate recommended: " Consider saving recorded calls in a database on a separate server. It will be simpler to build a retrieval interface that does not

The SC420 does not support APIC (at least not with current BIOS). The Digium TDM400B card seems to always seek the same IRQ so it locks one down. The clone X100P cards often get a shared IRQ, even if vacant ones are available. I've found both the Digium card and the clones very frustrating with this system. Thus the reason Digium does not recommend it. I've gone to a mostly SIP

jglucky@blueware.net wrote: > Has anyone attempted or have had any issues getting Asterisk and > Digium cards working on a Dell SC420 server? I have it up and running on 2 SC420's with TE110P cards. Haven't had any problems as of yet (knock on wood). Dell SC420 TE110P 2x40 GB SATA drive in a RAID 1 setup (Linux 2.6 kernel needed for SATA drives; turn off RAID detection in BIOS).

But for us? _____ From: William Boehlke [mailto:william.boehlke@signate.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:24 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Second edition of my * book has been released $39.95 retail. _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com

Why is using ulaw or alaw an unlikely scenario? I wouldn't use anything but ulaw\alaw. The Bells can compete on price and will if they have to. Where they CAN'T compete is quality. If there were something better than 711, I'd offer that. Well, there is 722, but not many things support it. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original

Our company, Signate, is going to be offering a three day introductory Asterisk training course, the first of a series. The first class will be in San Francisco the week of June 28. It will be a beta test to get the kinks out and we will not charge for the class or the materials. Anyone who attends is responsible for their own travel and lodging, if necessary. I doubt anyone reading the lsit

Hi, Is this server silent enough to be installed beside users in office environment ? http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/pedge_860?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070316/e657ef4d/attachment.htm

I'm trying to get a souped-up test machine(G5 Xserve) from Terrasoft to do some testing in a few weeks. If/when I actually get it I'll certainly post the results here. In theory the G5 should mop the floor with the Intel for high-volume Asterisk Zaptel usage, and I have heard from several Mac-heads that they have run three quad T1 digium cards on the Mac platform with no problems.

I don't think they are doing it with one Asterisk box. They did say "one rack of servers". Well, that might mean up to 50 computers if they are using blade servers. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of John Todd Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:21 PM To:

It's Digium, not Dell. I have two identical Dell 1850s, each with the allegedly offensive built-in E100 Ethernet ports. I placed a TE410P card in each. One worked great, the other would not modprobe. Upon examination, we discovered that the two TE410P cards had different firmware revisions. Turns out the one with the older version was the one that worked. We sent the second card back

Hello, Just chiming in here: >From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On >Behalf Of >bdolljr@bigskytech.com >Sent: Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 01:24 p.m. >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial >Discussion >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dell Hardware >> Mmhh nice !! So, why did Digium forbid it :)?

This works fine. Message: 26 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:22:23 +0800 From: "Ma Zhiyong" <mazhiyong@sohu.com> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] te405p and dell poweredge To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <004501c56b42$6a12fcd0$7301a8c0@hylaclient> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Hi, I want to install * and te405p on Dell Poweredge 1850. Can I

Hi, I want to install * and te405p on Dell Poweredge 1850. Can I do that successfully? Any one has successful experience on that scenario? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050607/fb7408a1/attachment.htm

There are no issues so far. I am just reporting that CentOS 8.2 (2004) is compatible with Dell PowerEdge R640 after installing it. On 2020-08-12 22:13, Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:46:19 +0800 > Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <ceo at teo-en-ming.com> wrote: > >> Subject: [Sharing] CentOS 8.2 (2004) Linux Server is Compatible with >> Dell

I went to RedHats' page and found hardware requirements and it said that the Dell Poweredge 6300 is a supported hardware. Then I went to linuxcare.com and it does not list the machine. Before I look like a buffoon, or continue to, Redhat will run on this machine, right? I appreciate the help. Thanks, --------------------------------------------------- Tony Ricker Technology Coordinator