similar to: outlook express intregation

We have asterisk running on a quad processor dell. The kernel has been compiled with SMP. However, asterisk seems to only use 1 processor. 3 of the 4 always stay at 100% idle. Is it pointless to have a multi-proc machine? I was going to buy a new dual 3.6Ghz Xeon server but if nothing will take advantage of the other proc... Perhaps my conception of multi-proc/threaded is warped. If asterisk is

I've read the Wiki on using asterisk's built-in transfer options (#8 and #6). They work fine but how does one cancle an attended transfer? Example: I have person on phone, I hit #6 to being att-transfer. I enter Sally's extension. I let it ring for a few seconds. Sally never picks up but her voicemail does. How do I hangup her voicemail and resume the previous call? The example on the

This is frustrating. Asterisk has crashed now twice today and neither crash has produced a core file. My ulimit is unlimited. I'm using safe_asterisk so asterisk is restarting immediatly, but how the hell am I suposed to find out wtf happened with no core file? Debug log doesn't say anything either. AGRHHHHHHHH -Matthew --

I received this email link from Macromedia today http://www.macromedia.com/newsletters/edge/february2005/index.html?secti onIndex=3&trackingid=AWQX They are now selling Breeze video conferencing server by the minute as an asp, this service is powered by the macromedia communications server which is just a sip server like asterisk but for video. I'm still offering a $2,000 bounty

I'm trying to determine if this is a zaptel issue or a sangoma issue. When I start our server, it gets to the point where it says "starting wanrouter" (thats the sangoma drivers) and it just hangs there. Nothing happens. Can't even use console. I unplugged the 4 PRI lines and rebooted. This time machine comes up. I logged in. While logged in, I plug the 4 spans back in. I try a

Anyone used the combination above? We are and it sounds like crap. The audio drops out in regular intervals which suggests that someone's g729 isn't doing its job correctly. I'm blameing XTen cause when I make a ulaw call that gets converted to 729 using digium's 729, calls sound fine. Anyone else? Similar experiences? -Matthew --

I posted this to the -dev list and have recieved no reponse so I'm gonna try the -users list. I'm trying to bring ast-ax-snmp up to date with current CVS. It's a small patch against chan_zap and pbx, but also has a loadable module component. That module is compiled against some NET-SNMPD headers/libraries. But net-snmpd also has module support and they have a function called

Before you jump ahead, yes I do have chan_zap.so loaded.. Call Flow: Asterisk 1 --IAX2--> Asterisk 2 ---> PRI -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 22.22.22.22: > requested format = ulaw, > requested prefs = (), > actual format = ulaw, > host prefs = (ulaw|alaw|gsm), > priority = mine -- Executing

Per my conversation below with digium, are there any legal alternatives to digium's G729? It is out of date, and doesn't support VAD nor silence detection. Digium has stated that they have no plans to update it anytime soon. VAD/Silence is a big deal with major carriers and we are having to fight a battle to get them to make special arrangements to turn off VAD/Silence in their

Even though they make the cards and advertise that they support data modes, digium won't support data mode on the $500 card they sold to me, so I must turn to the list. Has anyone configured a T100P to use a T1 strictly as bandwidth? Is there a HOWTO somewhere? Wiki has nothing I could find. I've got plently of public IPs I can assign to it but don't know how. Thanks, Matthew -----

I don't know...now I have a _X. in my CDR. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Boehm [mailto:mboehm@cytelcom.com] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 8:05 PM To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] SetVarCDR You must have some fux0red config 'cause using _X. works fine here. I haven't had an 's' in my CDRs for

All, I get this whenever trying to dial to a peer when the peer registered to another server. I'm basically trying to use realtime to check for the peer and dial it. Mar 24 09:16:47 VERBOSE[4527]: -- Executing Dial("SIP/brak-f69f", "IAX2/brak-test/107") in new stack Mar 24 09:16:47 DEBUG[4527]: MySQL RealTime: Retrieve SQL: SELECT * FROM sip_users WHERE name =

Hey gang, I'm trying to setup the ability to dial a SIP user via their email address. I'm using SJPhone as my tester UA, but most clients will be using XTen Pro. I added an SRV DNS entry into our zone, and it returns: ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> SRV _sip._udp.cytelcom.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status:

Hey gang, There must be any easy solution for this but my mind is frazzled on compiling 2.4 with RTC as module. Bleh. Currently extension 9000 is our VoicemailMain(@company) line. Some employee's are complaining that the old system was better because you didn't have to enter your mailbox number and that instead the old system took you right to it. I figured there was something similar

Hey gang, We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 SIP. We are also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works great except that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes for it to come up. The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any VLANs. Is there some way to skip this? In the 'Network Settings' I have

Hey guys, I sent an email to the list at 2:57PM central. I just now see it on the list, and its 3:23PM. Anyone else experience this? I am sending this email at 3:24PM central. Lets see when it gets posted to the list. -Matthew

Lets say that I have 9 phones with extensions 1 thru 9. (All SIP) Parking extension is set to 700. When I try to park a call to 700 as soon as I press the 7 key (to start typing 700) the person at extension 7's phone rings. So instead of transferring to extension 700, it went to 7. How can I slow down the response time of * to let me get to 700? Thanks, Matthew

OK. I just downloaded asterisk-1.0.3.tar.gz and did a 'cvs co -r v1-0 asterisk' into 2 seperate directories. I then did 'diff -ur asterisk-cvs/ asterisk-1.0.3/' and there were source code line differences between the two. Some code that was in asterisk-cvs wasn't in asterisk-1.0.3 and vice versa. Which of those is "the most recent"? If someone wants to use cvs to

Hello: I found a reference to the application SetVarCDR in the following post but I don't seem to have this available to me in my version of *. HYPERLINK "http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-cvs/2005-February/005337.html"http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-cvs/2005-February/005337.html My version of * is CVS-HEAD-03/10/05-18:42:35 I would like to change the

Why can't people learn to turn off this crap for lists? I don't care if you are on vacation and I'm sure that everyone else on this list doesn't care either. -Matthew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dijkstra, Roelof" <Roelof.Dijkstra@nl.compuware.com> To: "Matthew Boehm" <mboehm@cytelcom.com> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:24 AM Subject: