similar to: zttest

> They instantly got us to look at the output of zttest and we found that this was (in their words) 'extremely low', with 'best' and > 'worst' readings of 99.975586% and 99.963379% respectively. Might want to give PCI latency setting a try, it helped for me. My ZTTEST would drop occasionally to 99.95% until I set: setpci -v -s 01:01.0 latency_timer=ff

Has anyone had any compatibility issues with a TE110P card installed on a Dell Poweredge 1950? I noted the following error on the LCD display of the Dell Poweredge 1950: E1711 PCI PErr Slot 1 E171F PCIE Fatal Error B0 D4 F0. The Dell hardware owners manual states that it means the system BIOS has reported a PCI parity error on a component that resides in PCI configuration space at bus 0,

Hello, I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64. linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%

Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [root@mollendo ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples

Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but all that I get is: [root@SIP2-MI zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%

I am currently developing a asterisk ncurses interface using the manager API. The project is currently awaiting sourceforge's approval but I have a beta online at http://sig.lange.googlepages.com/assman . The projects real home will be assman.sf.net. This project really consists of two parts, libassman is a C manager API and assman is the ncurses portion. It's still beta but I have been

I have some DID numbers that come into Asterisk via PRI, then connect to a Panasonic DBS PBX via PRI. Outbound calls from the PBX go out via PRI to Asterisk, then out to the Telco's PRI. The sync LEDs on my PBX show that it is synced to Asterisk via the PRI. I have users complaining about random hangups. What is the best way toi approach finding the issue? ref: zttest looks good. ./zttest

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20120314/0496343e/attachment.htm>

Hi I am trying to build reliable fax solution with asterisk, iaxmodem and hylafax. I am attempting to do this on Compaq DL-360 with 2 pentium 3 1.2GHz (512 cache) and 2GB of RAM. I am using a Sangoma A101. After installing the newest zaptel and wanpipe-3.1.0 beta I did zttest and it didn't give me good results: 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%

I have 4 gig in my * box. I'm tuning for performance and I'd like to ask opinions: 1. asterisk -p == renice -20 ?? 2. I've turned off swap with no apparent ill effects. Can anyone commment on long term effects with moderate load (say, 30 SIP phones / 2-3K calls /day) 3. Can anyone comment on using ramdisk as swap and whether this is a good idea or bad idea? I'm using 2.6

Hi, I have a TDM400P running with only one FXO port running on a VIA EPIA MS10000 (1Ghz Via Eden). When I run zttest from Zaptel 1.2.1 it hang and when I interrupt it with Ctrl-C that is the result: ?anyone have some idea about why isn't working? Some additional info: # /usr/src/zaptel/zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... --- Results after 0 passes --- Best:

I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P, I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought

Hi Francois, Thank you for your interest. I tried the card alone so I don't think is an IRQ problem (anyway is there a way to be sure?) To be sincere, in all systems I saw (even working ones) there is an IRQ balance failed where Linux boots. The system is new, I tried different processors (P4 and Celeron) with SMP kernel and without. The card has the echo module, could not be

Our asterisk system gains access to the PSTN through a voip provider. We have no digium or other telephony hardware in our system. Do the zttest results still matter to us? Our results were as follows: --- Results after 1007 passes --- Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.780273 -- Average: 99.975763

Hi list! I'm trying to setup a new * server with a TE210P in a Dell 2850 box. I'm using zaptel version 1.2.5, the linux flavour I'm using is CentOS 4. In a previous thread I read about the results I should expect from zttest. On my home box (using the crappy Asus A7V600) I got really bad results from zttest (just over 97.5) but I know that this motherboard just sucks. To my

Hi. Download pwlib, openh323 Janus-patch at http://www.inaccessnetworks.com/projects/asterisk-oh323/Libraries Refer how to compile http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg86875.html Cheers. Kim. > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:42:25 +0100 > From: Cesar Garcia <cesar.garcia@idecnet.com> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] oh323 driver compiling

Hello, Today we setted up a server that needs to use MeetMe but doesn't have any Zap hardware. So we need to use ztdummy (at least, this was our idea). Rarely: zttest is not working at all (100% bad, using zttest -v doesn't give anything, etc.). Of course, after load ztdummy, there isn't any background or anything. It is the same kernel (Debian Etch default kernel, 2.6.18) than

Hi, I would like to know what type of configuration could get me closer to 100% hits in zttest, when testing a TDM400P with 4 FXO ports, I am currently running kernel 2.4.31, on a IBM Xseries 306, with 3gh CPU, HT is disabled, PCI latency was changed, i still cant get more then 99.975% in the zttest testings, Thanks for any info. Marco.

OK... maybe I got a little anxious and ran out and bought a Tyan GX28 with dual Opteron (dual core) processors. (It is a nice server ;) ) I did neglect to find out that you can not manually set the IRQ's on this motherboard. I am now stuck sharing an IRQ with the ethernet controller and no foreseeable end to my dilemma. I have a Digium TE210P and zttest consistently runs at 99.97% which

I've read as much as I can on this error and still can't seem to figure out what's causing this error: Jun 23 20:54:58 NOTICE[7483]: chan_zap.c:7395 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 23 20:55:03 NOTICE[7483]: chan_zap.c:7395 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jun 23 20:55:03 NOTICE[7483]: