similar to: Re: Hi, Bryan; was: Re: pronunciation? <snip> -- don't shoot the messenger ...

From: Collins Richey > Sounds pretty religious-based to me. > IBM=bad > HP,Sun, RedHat, SCO=good. > OTOH, from some of your comments, Novell=better. Are you really that shallow? IBM is our partner, not our friend. Sun has its interests too, and has 5 different entities of focus, which vary. Red Hat is a tale of two companies, cut-throat business combined with GPL-analness (like

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

From: Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> > I still remember the FIRST Linux GUI installer for a Linux distro. It > came on the Caldera Openlinux 2.2. It worked. It was really nice. Actually, the first distro with a GUI installer was Yggdrasil, circa 1993. It installed on 8MB of RAM using X and Athena/FVWM. > The Novell guys that were behind Caldera deserve plenty of respect for

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > To be quite honest with you - that's been and gone so quickly I can't > ever remember what my position was at that time. It actually happened over the span of 2 years before any name change. With the introduction of RHEL as a separate product, RHL was having an identity crisis. It used to be that ".2" was the

> Ubuntu and Knoppix can say they use Debian sources ... SLAX can say it > uses Slackware sources. Those guys have trademarks too. Debian and Slackware don't sell "enterprise" products. And many such projects are non-profit or otherwise. Unless Debian plans to establish itself as a commercial player, they don't need to defend their trademark. In fact, the commercial

I''m having problems launching the spin process via the deploy.rb task. Everything works great when is run the script manually via: % ssh admin@monterey.example.net /Web/Rails/Example/current/script/spin However, when I run ''cap spinner'' or ''rake remote:exec ACTION=spinner'', I get the following errors: % cap spinner loading configuration

Hello, LLVMers. I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? Thanks, Seung

On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > Hello, LLVMers. > > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? We've been pronouncing it kl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: abreve.gif Type: image/gif Size: 62 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? I pronounce it just like the english word, which is probably one of your later two options :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Anyone know how centos is actually pronounced? When people I work with ask me which linux I run, I say it like the word scent - oh - s, with a sharp S on the end. How's everyone else say it? How's it supposed to be said?

Timo, What is the "official" way to pronounce Dovecot? Is there a meaning to the word? A background on why you chose it? -- Jesse Peterson erage at softhome.net

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > MUCH more FOSS oriented I've been taking an informal survey on this for awhile now. I know the new, official acronym is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). But even before that acronym was popular, I had long argued that Stallman's insistence on calling it "Free Software" when that could be confused with

You'll get the why as well as the how-to in advanced systems and software at this renown conference for system administrators, developers, and researchers- 24th Annual USENIX TECHNICAL CONFERENCE June 6-11, 1999 Monterey, California Includes FREENIX track devoted to open source software ----------------------------------------------------------------- Review the program and register

Hi moises, Hi i need to done some modify/changes in one of the asterisk c source code ,,eg: app_meetme.c How can i compile and debug it without compile the whole module of asterisk... and also let me know which editor suitable it ,I'm using suse linux.. Plz help me reg. this .. -nsthi, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > We would not build and distribute either of these things if they were > not released via the GPL. The RPMS/SRPMS that we are distributing are > indeed GPL. We firmly agree with RedHat on this issue (that only GPL > things should be distributed). The problem is that many distros are statically building MySQL 4 with some

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Thanks - as you probably know, the long-winded discussion isn't > really about CIPE specifically so much as the philosophy behind > bundling a few thousand things together and then trying to > please anyone with a blanket policy about maintaining backwards > compatibility vs bug fixes vs new features. You just can't

From: R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> > Bryan - Please don't overstate this and make a problem where > none exists. There is an infinity of choices of which you > list three ... > Nor does one _have_ to 'get involved' with either the > RH-Fedora or Centos project to do effective distribution > building, or add-on packaging. There are independent

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > This is not really true. We will probably never have everything that FC > has as added features ... but CentOS-4 has several added features and we > have been out for only a 3 months (so, not required to wait a year). Oh, sorry, I should have clarified. What I meant by "wait a year" was the time from the first .0 or

From: Collins Richey <crichey at gmail.com> > It's a little more than that. I find few people who consider RedHat to > be a Demon Evil or that they can't do anything right, but I can > understand the concern about some of their decisions which have made > life difficult for (granted) a few, and it's not really helpful to > demonize those who complain, as Bryan has

From: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> > I have a real problem with this thread. It seems as if, according to some, > someone can only be with or against Red Hat. Yes, that was my major complaint too. > I'm sure Red Hat has made stupid decisions, has adopted buggy software and > are responsible for some of the headaches people have had. And I'm sure > even Red Hat