similar to: Fedora Core 3?

Ok, don't flame me, I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am not one of them. Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a bit old, so typical yum update Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my kernel 2.6.12... Installed the SRPM package Ran rpmbuild -bp -target=i686 kernel-2.6.spec Tried to build zaptel - error; You do not

Hi, I want to take a SRPM that is available for various versions of Fedora and rebuild it on a CentOS 4 system. Which release of Fedora is the closest to CentOS 4? In other words, which would be the best FC to take the SRPM for? Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson > Sent: 08 February 2006 08:41 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 or Fedora Core 4? yum update > ornot? > > However, if you expose the box to

asterisk trunk from April 1 on fc3. Box has been up for several months with no issues. Overnight, this remote box died, and rebooting shows the following on the console: exec of init (/sbin/init) Failed !!!: 20 umount /initrd/dev Failed: 2 kernel panic - not syncing: attempted to kill init Does this sound like a hard drive failure? The box is about 150 miles away and is inaccessible remotely.

The RPM for Fedora Core 2 seems to work just fine on Core 3. (The graphics window got smaller, but I'm sure there is a setting for that.) Jon -- Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron R search page: http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/

The RPM for Fedora Core 2 seems to work just fine on Core 3. (The graphics window got smaller, but I'm sure there is a setting for that.) Jon -- Jonathan Baron, Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Home page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron R search page: http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > This is not really true. We will probably never have everything that FC > has as added features ... but CentOS-4 has several added features and we > have been out for only a 3 months (so, not required to wait a year). Oh, sorry, I should have clarified. What I meant by "wait a year" was the time from the first .0 or

I installed FC 2 X86-64 on an Athlon 64 system. I then installed R 2.0.0. It runs fine except when I try to install or update packages using either "install.packages" or "update.packages". I get the following types of errors: gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -I/usr/local/include -D__NO_MATH_INLINES -mieee-fp -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -c block.c -o block.o cc1:

I want to compile a custom xenU kernel for a firewall distribution (endianfw, version of ipcop), I can get it to load up but the kernel is missing some modules that aren''t resident. So I want to make a custom version for this domU, I know what I need kernel+openswan+xen+patch-o-matic but I not sure the best way to go about this, do I patch a fedora source or start with a vanilla kernel?

Hi all, I hope I'm not starting a flame war. I'm installing Centos 4.2 for a mail server. I've been experimenting with, Centos before, and now wanting to put it into a real action as mail server. Can someone pls tell me the up and down between Centos and FC? I'm familiar with FC4 and some things that I like from it: 1. The available packages are abundant. Very easy to find

Running fc3 with current cvs-head... Is there a nice way to rotate the /var/log/asterisk/messages file without shutting down asterisk? I'm currently rotating the log files via cron, however my script requires asterisk to be shut down, which also kills any outstanding cli sessions (eg, asterisk -rvvvvv). Would like to rotate the files without killing the cli session. Any reasonable way to

Hi everybody. I'd like to ask if someone could tell me when the binaries for R 2.9 / redhat entreprise 4 / X86_64 will be available ? I don't need a precise date but some indication like 1 month, 6 month, never ? Thank you for any help. Mathieu --- Mathieu Van der Haegen Machine Learning Group Université Libre de Bruxelles [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all. Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system? I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat 9 (and FC 1) don't support SATA drives, and apparently FC 3 does. We are only familiar with red hat and are in a point in time that switching distros is not available. The guy installing the system is already on location. Yes, I

Has anyone successfully compiled mpg123 in the 1.0.x or 1.2beta1 distributions (I'm running FC3 linux on an Opteron 2 processor system)? Are there any patches out there to make it work? gcc -DI386_ASSEM -DPENTIUM_OPT -DREAL_IS_FLOAT -DLINUX - DREAD_MMAP -DOSS -DTERM_CONTROL -Wall -O2 - m486 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all- loops

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > I'm still wondering about that... If anyone except Linus himself > even suggested that changing kernel interfaces in a way that would > break device drivers was a good thing, I can't imagine the reaction. > I could see that the changes through 2.4 were improving things, but > is there anything that is measurably better in

Attempting to build OpenOffice 2 on CentOS 4 from rawhide (future FC5) SRPM. The spec file has EL4 target (which is nice), and I got almost all dependencies in place (mostly from 4.2beta and some from rawhide). However, I'm missing the ant package. Ant from rawhide doesn't compile since it is already gcc 4 based (fails on dependencies, getting it to use gcc4 instead of gcc seems like

Hi, On a new Dell laptop, with a fresh FC3 installation (with latest updates applied) I am experiencing make hanging consistently after/during building grDevices. This happens when using the configure flag --with-lapack (I have the LAPACK rpm distributed with FC3 installed). The last two lines of output are: make[5]: Leaving directory

Dropbox has an RPM for Fedora Core 9 (x86). I am running CentOS 5.4 on my Desktop, which I believe is based on Fedora Core 6. Are the libraries Fedora Core 9 uses substantially different than those CentOS 5.4 uses? If Dropbox had an SRPM available, I would Download that and Rebuild, but I'm sure it is Proprietary and they won't release an SRPM to me. TIA! Lanny

Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am rebuilding from scratch. I installed FreePBX (CentOs) from scratch and asterisk was running, but had not yet been configured. It too crashed with a kernel panic. Ran memtest for 24 hours; no errors or issues uncovered. I then noticed that FreePBX installed using a SMP kernel (and grub indicated a non-SMP kernel was installed as

good afternoon, current status: samba pdc running samba 3.0.10-1.fc3 on fedora core 3 on a dell server. clients are windows 2000 pro workstations. authentication is via tdbsam. pretty vanilla setup. no active directory, ldap, winbind, etc. i have downloaded the rpm's from samba.org for current stable release samba 3.0.14a-1. usually i perform upgrades to samba server using rpm -Fvh