Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "spandsp and app_rxfax (alternative topic: t38modem)"
2007 Jun 11
1
Crashes with Spandsp, app_rxfax.c, and asterisk 1.4.4
Hi everybody,
I have a Fedora Core 4 x86 32 bit install, which I recently
upgraded from asterisk 1.2 to the office 1.4.4 tarball.
In the process of doing that I had to upgrade some
autoconf/automake stuff, but it worked fine, and my new asterisk
works fine.
Except that anytime I receive a fax with spandsp and app_rxfax,
asterisk seg faults.
I have applied the spandsp
2006 Jan 12
6
app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so
Hi,
I just installed spandsp 0.0.3pre6 with libtiff 3.7.1 and evrythinghs is
ok. I recompiled asterisk and run ldocnfig, but whrn I start asterisk I
get this error:
[app_rxfax.so]Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:258
ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: undefined
symbol: fax_set_phase_d_handler
Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:440 load_modules: Loading
2004 Dec 29
5
spandsp-0.0.2pre6
Just wondering if anyone else has managed to successfully compile
spandsp-0.0.2pre6...
I'm assuming it is working for most people, else it probably wouldn't
have been released, and/or, other people would have had more to say
about it...
In any case, these are the errors I am getting while doing a make:
if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
-I -g -O2 -MT
2004 Oct 01
4
spandsp 0.0.2
Hi all,
There is a test version for the next release of spandsp at
ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.2pre2 Only use this if
you wish to experiment. In general, using spandsp-0.0.1 is probably more
stable right now. If you have had problems with Canon FAX machines not
accepting FAXes from spandsp-0.0.1 you might like to try this version. I
have had at least one report from
2008 Dec 22
2
Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4withLenny
...described in the README file ;).
SpanDSP - 0.0.4 pre 16
LibTiff - >= 3.8 but <4.0
I had to trawl around for the right SpanDSP - but I can e-mail a copy to whomever wants one (drop me a personal e-mail and I'll attach it by return)
HTH
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
2005 Jan 01
1
spandsp app_rxfax - the sending software loops
Hi,
After a hiatus of several months, I decided to try spandsp again
because it is such an excellent addition to asterisk. Using 1.0.3 and
spandsp 0.0.1k.
When I send a fax from a laptop software fax that works with every
machine I've ever had to fax to, I get something like this as staus
return from the fax sending software:
- Getting Local ID
- Getting Parameters
and it loops like this
2004 Aug 18
27
SpanDSP
Anyone knows where can I find spandsp? Official site seems permanently
down...
TIA,
Simone.
2004 Aug 19
1
SpanDSP/RxFax help...
I've seen people mention that they have fax reception working with
Asterisk, spandsp, and app_rxfax.
I'm using the latest Asterisk from CVS, SpanDSP 0.0.1k, and the latest
app_rxfax.c (as mirrored by friendly list members recently), and libtiff
3.5.7. Asterisk is detecting the fax signal properly, and executing
the fax extension in the dialplan.
The fax part of the dialplan is pretty
2008 Dec 17
2
Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4 with Lenny
Hi,
I've read README file in agx-ast-addons-1.4.17.5.tar.bz2
It says "Install libTiff >=3.8 and <4.0"
Should you really use this agx-ast-addons to get app_rxfax and app-_txfax
running with latest 1.4.22 ?
If positive, should you take this libtiff warning into account ?
If positive, where can you find such libtiff version as Debian repository (I
didn't check alternate
2008 Dec 22
1
Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4with Lenny
JFYI - I run (successfully) agx-addons with 1.4.22 and Etch.
Make sure you have the right version of SpanDSP installed (as well as the tiff libraries).
-->> -----Original Message-----
-->> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
-->> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Loic Didelot
-->> Sent: 19 December 2008 20:33
2006 Nov 16
5
spandsp 0.0.3 RxFax fax reception crashes bristuffed asterisk 1.2.13
Hi,
I'm using spandsp-0.0.3
[http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/
spandsp-20061116.tar.gz]
on a bristuffed asterisk (1.2.13)
[http://212.91.251.199/~junghanns.net/downloads/bristuff-0.3.0-
PRE-1v.tar.gz]
libtiff is at version 3.6.0
Running on: Linux router2 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC
2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Debian testing distro.
I've tried many
2009 Jan 07
1
app_rxfax and app_txfax with Ubuntu?
Hi, all. I just tried to fire up app_txfax and app_rxfax, only to find
that I can't seem to compile them. The problem appears to be that my
libtiff library is wrong. Only problem is that, according to the README,
I need "libtiff >=3.8 and <4.0", which is all well and good... except that
there is no 3.x libtiff anywhere in the Ubuntu repository (that I can
find, at any rate).
2004 Sep 20
4
spandsp / compilation errors
I am attempting installation of spandsp on to an Asterisk installation on
Linux RH9
the distribution i am using is that are URL http://ftp2.tootai.net - the
README for which i have followed verbatim -
my only issue on this was the target for the port.h / tif_dir.h / tiffiop.h
files in the 'headers' folder of the distribtion
i put these in the /usr/include folder based simply on the
2004 Apr 29
2
spandsp compile error: PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP' undeclared here
Hey All,
I'm having a bit of a problem trying to get spandsp working on my
asterisk machine. The machine is a Redhat 9.0 install with the latest
version of libtiff and libtiff-devel (according to freshrpms.net).
I manaaged to download, compile and successfully install the actual
spandsp package with no errors. The problem comes when I try to compile
the rxfax and txfax asterisk
2004 Oct 07
1
spandsp RxFAX problems.
Hello,
Anyone else experiencing problems with the latest spandsp (pre3)
and last libtiff beta? I'm getting 8 bytes long file, with the
TIFF header only during such connection:
-- Accepting call from 'XXXXXXX' to 'YYYYYY' on channel 0/2, span 1
-- Executing SetVar("Zap/2-1", "FAXFILE=/tmp/foch.tif") in new stack
-- Executing
2005 Feb 15
1
app_rxfax creating bad faxes? (StripOffsets)
Using CVS HEAD (20050214 with the new jitter buffer) and the latest (0.0.6?)
spandsp. libtiff version is 3.5.7, compiled from source. System is
Slackware 10, 2.4.26 kernel, no fancy patches and processor is a P4 1.5GHz on
an Intel motherboard.
Most faxes are coming through fine but a few companies in particular are
having very poor success faxing to us. Most faxes LOOK like they'd
2006 Jan 12
1
R: app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so
I have to re-compile also app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so or just spandsp ?
Thanks
Giordano
________________________________
Da: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Per conto di Colin Anderson
Inviato: gioved? 12 gennaio 2006 17.20
A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
2006 Nov 20
3
Spandsp rxfax txtax fails no errors
I'm using Slackware 11.
I unistalled the package that provides libtiff 3.8.....
and installed the most current 3.7.... for lib tiff.
I downloaded asterisk 1.4 beta3 and the 1.4 beta2 addons and untared them.
created a simlink:
ln -s asterisk-1.4.0-beta3 asterisk
I've compiled spandsp from as follows
cd /usr/src
wget
2005 Sep 09
1
spandsp txfax multi page problem
Dear All,
I'm having problem with spandsp/txfax,
I'm not able to send a multi paged tiff file,
the fax machine receives the first page of the document and
complains about communication problem.
The file what I'm trying to send has 2 pages and
is received & generated by spandsp/rxfax.
Searched in the archives, but found no solution.
I'm using:
Dell Optiplex PC
Inoteska Quad
2007 Jun 15
4
app_rxfax vs (iaxmodem+hylafax)
can anybody help me to choose the most reliable fax solution for * .
after googling the net i found that there are at least two solutions
for this, app_rxfax+spandsp and iaxmodem+hylafax.
- what's the differences between these two?
- which one's better? why?
thanks