similar to: HUP signal?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "HUP signal?"

2019 Mar 15
0
Reload subnet config with HUP signal
Hi, I need to re-open the thread blow. The situation is still the same. The HUP signal does not trigger reloading of subnet declarations in own hosts file (Version 1.0.35). After a quick view to the source code, file src/net.c shows in line 658 would reload subnets when using StrictSubnets only. But why? With StrictSubnets it doesn't make sense to me. I did a quick check and removed the if
2009 Apr 19
4
httpd crashes after signal HUP
Hello I'm running CentOS 5.3 with httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.x86_64 and php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3.x86_64. When the logrotate scripts run and send the HUP signal to httpd, the httpd process quits instead of reloading. The only thing I can find in the logs is this: [Sun Apr 19 04:02:04 2009] [notice] seg fault or similar nasty error detected in the parent process There wasn't any segfault
2007 Mar 12
1
Mongrel - HUP Signal
With the latest version of Mongrel, will Mongrel reopen log files when sent a HUP signal? I would like to do a log rotate, but would prefer not to restart the mongrel instances as monit is watching after them all. monit is great for restarting the individual instances, but I would prefer not to do a restart all through monit. I would be curious if this is advisable. -- ----- Christopher
2010 Oct 02
2
Unicorn doesn't reload the app after the HUP signal
Hi folks, I''ve experimented a problem while deploying my app, I''ve sent the HUP signal to the master process, I''ve checked everything is ok: new master and workers are spawned and the old ones are killed(I''ve checked the PIDs), but the new code deployed isn''t reflected in the living site, so I''ve to stop and start again unicorn in order to see
2004 Dec 16
1
Low-latency kernel?
While trying to apply the low-latency kernel patches to our RHv9 Linux 2.4.20-31.9, the patches would not apply. In comparing one of the first patch files (lowlatency.h) to that already on the system, it would appear the low latency patches were already applied by RH. The original RHv9 file (lowlatency.h) even had the patch author's name/credit in it. Does anyone know whether RH made an
1999 Jul 21
0
2.0.5: problem with HUP reopening logs
rh60/caldera1.3 2.0.x (before 2.0.5) PROBLEM: samba didn't reopen then logs after HUP. I posted about this to samba-bugs; AT corrected the problem in 2.0.5-preXX, but not completely it seems. 2.0.5 PROBLEM: samba reopens the logs after a HUP but logs only the first connection to the new log, then it keeps logging to the old one. Here is what I see: # pwd /var/log/samba # smbclient|grep
2000 Jan 18
1
does 2.0.6 fix kill -HUP logrotation?
2.0.5 (on linux) has a small annoyance in that, when the log files get rotated, kill -HUP won't point the daemons to the new log files. They keeps logging to the old ones until they are stopped/started. Does 2.0.6 fix this?
2011 Aug 03
2
Question about HUP + USR2 + QUIT
Currently, on deploys we''re sending HUP to the "old" master to reload the config, and then we send it a USR2 to reload the app code. Is this redundant -- i.e. does USR2 reload the unicorn config, or just the application code? I am under the impression that USR2 forks a new master from the old, and only reloads app code, and not the unicorn config, but I just wanted to double
2004 Aug 06
1
icecast2 sig-HUP
Hi: I noticed in an icecast2 log that a HUP will reload the server config. This is a nice feature. Are there any configuration options that won't take effect with such a reload, or will it completely take effect? If the ports have changed, for example, will these change? Geoff. <p> -- Geoff Shang <gshang@uq.net.au> ICQ number 43634701 Make sure your E-mail can be read by
2001 Feb 19
0
Restarting with kill -HUP
Hi, If sshd is started with 'sshd', restarting with kill -HUP will fail. I've included the most obvious patch, but making sure that the full pathname is in saved_argv[0] just might be more secure. Cheers, Han Holl --- sshd.c.orig Mon Feb 19 10:55:54 2001 +++ sshd.c Mon Feb 19 10:56:15 2001 @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ { log("Received SIGHUP; restarting.");
2004 Aug 06
0
icecast & HUP
I have this strange problem where when I try to reload my config by sending a HUP to the icecast process it produces this in the error.log file: [2004-01-15 21:06:07] INFO connection/connection_accept_loop Scheduling config reread ... [2004-01-15 21:06:07] EROR event/event_config_read Error parsing config, not replacing existing config [2004-01-15 21:06:07] EROR event/event_config_read Parse
2010 Mar 15
1
log rotation not working
Hello, I've got a Centos 5.4 box that is not rotating it's mail logs. I just found out about this, the file is considerably large. I've included my log rotation configs if anyone has any suggestions i'm open to them. Thanks. Dave. /etc/rsyslog.conf: # Log all kernel messages to the console. # Logging much else clutters up the screen. #kern.*
1999 Nov 17
4
2.0.6: HUP/charset/profiles/smbmount/logging
This is the list of problems I had with samba-2.0.6 so far. Can anyone tell me if he can reproduce them and if he considers them as problems? 2.0.6 on linux 2.2.13 or 2.0.33 1) sighup/log reopening doesn't always work: connections that are already active keep logging to the old logs; logrotate rotates/zip the logs and samba stops logging completely till restart. 2) Localized chars. I have
2017 May 02
1
logrotate failed ... (CentOS 6.9)
On 01.05.2017 13:15, James Pearson wrote: > Walter.H at mathemainzel.info: >> I get regularily such a mail >> >> <mail> >> Anacron job 'cron.daily' on .... >> >> /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: >> >> error: error running non-shared postrotate script for >> /var/log/clamd.clamsmtp/clamsmtpd.log of >>
2014 Feb 14
1
SIGHUP signal
Hi, I'm new to the list so excuse me if this question has been asked before. Yesterday, I changed my rsyncd.conf file to add one more module to it. Then I sent a kill -HUP $pid signal to rsync running in daemon mode, but what gives? It just died so I had to start it up again. I though sending a HUP would just make it reload its config file, no? -- Yours truly
2004 Sep 26
1
spandsp patch help
I've installed spandsp-0.0.1k on a RHv9 box with CVS-HEAD-09/19/04 and compiled the libraries just fine. Having a problem with patching the asterisk/apps Makefile however. The patch attempt results in: [root@phoenix apps]# patch <Makefile.patch patching file Makefile Hunk #1 FAILED at 35. Hunk #2 FAILED at 68. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej [root@phoenix
2005 Jan 08
1
zaptel fxotune.c tool
I noticed the following came into cvs head yesterday: > Update of /usr/cvsroot/zaptel > In directory mongoose.digium.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2118 > > Modified Files: > fxotune.c wctdm.c wctdm.h > Log Message: > More TDM card echo API modifications. Making the fxotune program automatically > find the correct coefficients for the module. Lots of neat stuff. I did a complete
2018 Jun 21
1
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
Hai, As Harald showed, this is a known thing, this did hit samba, after the multi threaded support. See also : systemctl cat smbd.service For what works what not. For a reload the kill -HUP MAINPID is, as i know, the only thing that works atm. Is this a AD DC or a member? ( sorry didnt follow the complet thread ) this catch my eye just now. Imo, for a member it should work, but i've
2011 Feb 25
0
[patch] Reopen dumpfiles on signal
On Feb 25, 2011, at 1:43 AM, Niv Sardi wrote: > A bit of nitpiking: > > * indentation seems off. What's the convention for this project? It looked like 4 spaces, and I tried to match but might have let some tabs slip through. Someday I should learn how to tweak vim to do this for me. >> --- src/source.c (revision 17873) >> +++ src/source.c (working copy) >> @@
2004 Aug 06
0
[PATCH] - Make reopening of Log files
independent from Configuration Reload In-Reply-To: <200406161051.03808.msmith@xiph.org> References: <1087307353.28637.11.camel@forge.intermeta.de> <200406161051.03808.msmith@xiph.org> Message-ID: <1087392799.7778.4.camel@forge.intermeta.de> Hi, yes, I tested the patch. Then I sent you the wrong version. I attached the correct one. Yes, this one works. Why just reopening