similar to: TDM400p FXO module always offhook

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "TDM400p FXO module always offhook"

2004 Dec 07
2
TDM400P FXO channel remains Offhook after outoing or incoming call / line is parallel with other telephone equipment
>Asterisk and it works fine untill the following >situation: > >- one of the telco lines occasionally becomes mute after call is completed, would not provide dial tone, (not sure about ringing on that >line) - both via old and new PBX. >- zap show channel <n> would show that line as 'Offhook', though no telephone is off hook. > >If physical line would be
2005 Aug 12
3
TDM400P FXO channel hookstate always "Offhook" & outbound digits sent before provider dialtone
I have an Asterisk@Home 1.3 server (Asterisk 1.0.9) and recently added a TDM400P with (1) FXO card on port 4. Inbound calls are always successful but outbound calls fail 75% of the time with intercept messages from my dial tone provider that include "we're sorry, your call did not go through", and "we're sorry, when placing a local call it is now necessary to dial an area
2008 Oct 20
1
Zaptel FXO offhook when connected to PSTN
I installed Trixbox and a TDM400P with 2 FXO and 2 FXS ports and am having an annoying issue with the FXO ports. As soon as I plug either one into the phone line it's as though the line is disconnected i.e. get disconnected tone when trying to dial out, line is busy when dialling in. The CLI shows the following: trixbox1*CLI> zap show channel 4 Channel: 4 File Descriptor: 18 Span: 11*
2005 Sep 23
1
FW: channel offhook state
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jacqueline Lee [mailto:jlee@isdomaininc.com] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:46 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: channel offhook state > > > We are using a digium card (TDM400) with asterisk for our access to the > PSTN. Initially when the server starts, all the zap channels on the card > are in the
2004 May 07
6
X100P keeping PSTN line Offhook
Happens quite often. X100P FXO card puts the PSTN line offhook, so that no calls go out or come in. The outside callers get a busy siganl while inside callers cant dial PSTN. Its a DELL optiplex P3 128MB ram 500MHz processor. Here is some more info: (see the zapata.conf in the end) Please direct me where to look for problem. Thanks!!! ======================================== pbx1*CLI> zap
2004 Aug 03
1
Analog channel stays offhook
Hi, We are having a problem with asterisk detecting that an analog ext has been put down. This seems only to happen after a number of calls have been made. We have an FXO port (TDM400P with FXO module) connected to our PBX and are using this to test asterisk prior to rolling our for our small office. What happens is that we make a number of calls to this ext which 1st rings a phone (FXS)
2005 Jun 22
3
TDM400P & Channel Group
I installed a TDM400P with 4 FXO modules. Before moving all of my office phone lines to it, I decided to move only one for testing. I plugged it into port 4 on the card. In zaptel.conf I have: fxsks=1-4 And zapata.conf: context=incoming signalling=fxs_ks busydetect=yes callprogress=no musiconhold=default usecallerid=yes callerid=asreceived group=1 channel => 1-4 When I launch an outbound
2004 Jun 01
2
problems with TDM400P
Hi, We have two of these 4 port FXO cards. However, we are having some problems with incoming/outgoing calls. The latest version of Asterisk/zaptel from CVS is being used. Voicemail, internal SIP <-> SIP calls between Pingtel xpressa hard phones work terrific, echotest is fine, and so on. The zaptel and wcfxs modules load fine, and show all 8 FXO interfaces in dmesg:
2011 Jul 07
4
[LLVMdev] Improving Garbage Collection
On 07.07.2011 08:31, Nate Fries wrote: > On 7/6/2011 6:24 PM, Talin wrote: >> The LLVM code generators and analysis passes have a much more >> thorough knowledge of SSA value lifetimes than frontends do, and >> therefore could avoid spilling and reloading of values when it wasn't >> needed. > Although this would indeed be nice, it is not done by similar >
2004 Dec 06
0
TDM OnHook/OffHook
My TDM400P w/ 4 FXO cards seems to have trouble with onhook/offhook switching. It dials perfectly, but does not seem to be changing the onhook/offhook state appropriately. It changes sometimes, but it's not really reliable. For example: When I booted the machine, it started as onhook. It remained "onhook" through the entire first call (which was silent on both ends --
2007 Jan 26
1
Analog FXO status checking
Hi all, I would like to make a script/program that would be able to show lots of status information from my analog FXO lines (and FXS lines in the near future). Example of interesting status information: - Hook status: is there a call being made with that zap? - Voltage status: cable connected, voltage values (if possible), line ringing? - RX/TX Volume status I'm using a TDM400 card with
2003 Aug 22
0
dtmf/audio before going offhook
Hello, Caller -> PRI -> SIP -> application. If application goes offhook right away, dtmf/audio works fine in both directions. If application, before going offhook (sending OK) plays a message and wants dtmf/voice from the caller, then caller can hear this message but his dtmf/voice don't reach application. Any way to configure it? Thank you. Alex Zarubin -------------- next
2006 Jun 20
3
TDM400P bad echo problem, tried lots of things
I have a bad echo problem on my TDM400P with one FXO module installed. I have tried a few things, such as: * setting rxgain and txgain to 0 * setting echocancelwhenbridged to no / yes * settting echocancel to 64 / no / yes * setting echocanceltraining to 800 / no / yes * MG2 echo cancellation * MARK2 echo cancellation * KB1 echo cancellation * AGGRESSIVE_SUPPRESSOR option of MARK2 Each time
2007 Feb 17
8
ZFS with SAN Disks and mutipathing
Hi, I just deploy the ZFS on an SAN attach disk array and it''s working fine. How do i get dual pathing advantage of the disk ( like DMP in Veritas). Can someone point to correct doc and setup. Thanks in Advance. Rgds Vikash Gupta This message posted from opensolaris.org
2004 Jul 16
2
Offhook tone in channel OSS/dsp
Hi, I have to develop a phone application using asterisk's chan_oss. When the phone is idle, i.e. the last command was a hangup, one hears a "toot, toot, toot, ..." But unforuntaly its use is in Germany, where one expects a continous "toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ..." before dialing. Is there anything to define the tone indicating "ready to dial"?
2004 Dec 04
0
x100p offhook/onhook states
Hi, I'm having an interesting problem with my card. It seems to work fine, for the most part. When I first load the module and asterisk, it detects the line in the on-hook state. However, after the first phone call, zap show channel 1 lists it as being off-hook. During subsequent calls, the card is listed as being on-hook, and when it's not used -- off-hook. There are also some weird
2005 Jul 27
0
Sending DTMF Tones Offhook
Greetings All! The Asterisk Call Manager works great. But I have one question for anyone who has used it. I cannot get the system to send some DTMF tones down the channel once the call has been made. Below is the script I am using to make the call, and start recording the channel. I am starting to make a system the will use asterisk to become an automatic random quality monitoring system
2011 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] Improving Garbage Collection
For the past few years, my group in Intel Labs has been working on a project similar to LLVM and C--, and perhaps our experience in handling roots and stack walking could be useful in deciding how LLVM should evolve in the GC area. Our project is called Pillar (you can see our paper "Pillar: A Parallel Implementation Language" in Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing 2008 for a
2011 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] Improving Garbage Collection
My thoughts are many, and inline below: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Anderson, Todd A <todd.a.anderson at intel.com > wrote: > For the past few years, my group in Intel Labs has been working on a > project similar to LLVM and C--, and perhaps our experience in handling > roots and stack walking could be useful in deciding how LLVM should evolve > in the GC area. Our
2011 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] Improving Garbage Collection
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Anderson, Todd A <todd.a.anderson at intel.com<mailto:todd.a.anderson at intel.com>> wrote: For the past few years, my group in Intel Labs has been working on a project similar to LLVM and C--, and perhaps our experience in handling roots and stack walking could be useful in deciding how LLVM should evolve in the GC area. Our project is called Pillar