Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Cisco Router FXO / Skinny"
2003 Oct 14
1
Cisco hard IP phones and Skinny vs. SIP
I have Asterisk up and running and it is working great with my SIP phones.
However, I have some "Skinny"-protocol Cisco 7960s. Does Asterisk support
the Skinny protocol? I've seen some references to Skinny in the software.
If so, should I stick with Skinny with the 7960 or convert to SIP? If
anyone has some Skinny confs they would send me I'd be much obliged.
If I should
2004 Aug 05
1
Skinny and CISCO 7905G
Hello,
I tried to configure a cisco 7905 IP phone using the skinny channel but
I had not much luck.
The relevant portion of skinny.conf is:
[cisco1]
device=SEP000F3487F8E3
callerid="Alex" <123-456-789>
mailbox=500
callwaiting=1
transfer=1
context=default
threewaycalling=1
line => 500 ; Dial(Skinny/500@cisco1)
I set up the tftp server, and prepared the following
2008 Oct 09
1
Cisco 7960 sccp, Skinny and 1.4
Hi All,
I'm thinking of creating a new asterisk server using the latest 1.4
stable release to replace my ageing Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r7231 (its
been a while!).
My only concern - my phones are Cisco 7960's (with sccp firmware 7.2
loaded) and to support them better, I remember compiling in a skinny(?)
driver to replace the (from what I could tell) basic in built sccp
support. After
2006 Oct 30
3
Cisco 7960 Skinny calling SIP phone
Before I got down the path of converting a Cisco 7960 I have over to SIP I
wanted to try and set it up using Skinny.
The phone registers ok with Asterisk. When I call a SIP softphone extension
on my network the call is made and I can answering it. However no voice is
heard over the call.
When I debug Skinny on the console after the call has connected I see the
following messag:
Recieved Alarm
2004 Aug 23
3
Cisco 7960G, Skinny.conf, and reboots
I could use some skinny/Cisco help here. Was finally able to get the phone
registered to * but whenever someone tries to call that phone it freezes and
reboots itself. Same thing happens when you pick the handset up off the
7960G; it locks and reboots about 5 sec later.
Here is what * shows when I plug the phone in:
-- Starting Skinny session from 64.72.107.1
Device SEP000F3442E4A7 is
2004 Jan 13
4
Again: 7920 Cisco IP Phone Skinny & SIP
hi!
i had some good news regarding the cisco 7920 and the internetworking
with asterisk (and possibly SIP ?).
Status: chan_sccp.so not coredumping anymore :-)
Phone contantly in reboot loop [see below] :-(
Reboot Loop means:
------------------
Phone auth's with AP
Phone gets IP from DHCP & TFTP Server
Phone loads OS7920.TXT
Phone loads SEP<macaddr>.CNF.XML
Phone loads
2005 Feb 22
2
Repost: How do I install Skinny support for non sip cisco phones
hi All,
Sorry to repost but................
I have a server setup that runs sip no problem. I want to try a cisco phone.
how do I
a) Tell if I have skinny support loaded
b) Load it onto a debian system
Many thanks
2011 Aug 17
4
Puppet agent hangs for over a minute, no info in --summarize
Hoping you guys might be able to help me out, I''m not sure what''s
wrong but puppet agent hangs for over a minute, no resource spikes
(CPU, memory, etc all stay basically the same as without starting
puppet, barely a blip, and I''ve got more than enough headroom). It''s
not a serious issue for continuous usage, but really, really annoying
when testing the manifests
2011 Jun 25
1
Cisco IP Phones and Skinny in asterisk 1.8.4.2 "tooooooooooooooooo"
Hi All;
Again, the Cisco IP Phones 7942G and using Skinny:
I upgraded the firmware to version 8.5 (skinny) and I am using skinny channel (chan_skinny) and the skinny.conf file.
The phones are registering, but when we use them to place a call, we only hear tooooooooooo in the handset and we do not hear voice (even when we dial the digits, we only hear toooooooo .. but it dials and destination
2011 Jun 13
13
Cisco IP Phones and Skinny in asterisk
Hi All;
Can anyone advise if using Cisco IP Phones in skinny protocol is fine or not? Or it is better to use it in SIP protocol?
Regards
Bilal
2003 Jul 23
1
Cisco 7960 upgrade from SKINNY load
Here's a clip of comments lifted from a Cisco bug list. This will
be perhaps useful to those of you who have just purchased a Cisco
phone off eBay.
JT
-------------
(1) Short problem description:
Documentation on how to load SIP image on phone with skinny software
(2) Longer problem description (what happens):
If the phone is loaded with the Cisco Skinny code, then there is a
small
2005 Jun 09
1
Cisco 7960 and Skinny
Hi,
I have bought two Cisco 7960 phones.
I have tried to set-up them to work with Asterisk over Skinny protocol, but
when I try to dial the phone from Asterisk it says that all lines are busy.
Is there something that should be configured on the phone's side? Can
someone help me with that?
Also, I would like to upgrade these phones to use SIP. How can I get the SIP
firmware for my phones. I
2005 Oct 16
1
Can Asterisk "proxy" a SIP phone to make it look like a Cisco skinny softphone?
Hi there
We have a Cisco VOIP environment here, with hard and softphones. I have
a softphone account/etc, but I'm a Linux user and (as far as I'm aware)
there is no Cisco softphone for Linux. However I can run Asterisk. So I
was wondering if there is a way to "convert" a SIP phone transaction
into a SKINNY transaction so that the Cisco environment thinks it is a
Cisco
2004 Dec 15
2
Cisco 7960 SIP + 7914
I found a few mentions of the 7914 being used with Asterisk, these all
covered SCCP/skinny though. Does anyone know if the 7914 can even be
used with SIP? If so, any pointers? Is it a services thing? Anyone get
the operator (line/extension status) to work with it. Thanks for the
help, Cisco doesn't even mention ANYTHING about SIP + the 7914.
Matt
2005 Sep 14
1
Liquidation: Cisco; Polycom; D-Link; MediaTrix, Colubris - Highly Reduced Prices
We have extra equipment that was over-ordered or unused. All of the
equipment is brand new. The equipment has been highly discounted to move
quickly - the last set of equipment sold in 48 hours. If this equipment is
of interest to you, call or e-mail quickly.
Buy on VOXILLA and SAVE $300 each (Cisco routers & switches):
http://store.voxilla.com/customer/home.php?cat=259
For Sale (all new):
2005 May 24
1
Cisco Config
Is anyone here familiar with configuring Cisco routers? I have a Cisco
3620 with 3x WIC-1DSU-T1, 1x 2FE-2W, and 1x 1E-2W. I have 2 T1 lines
being brought in by ACD.NET, a local CLEC. Within the next 3 months we
will be getting another line from them, as our bandwidth needs grow. I
am new to cisco and need help configuring this router. I am currently on
a 1M DSL line with them. The DSL modem is
2006 May 01
0
Cisco 2621 router for voice and data?
Hey Guys/Gals,
I was thinking of getting a cisco 2621 router with 2 FastE modules and 1
T1-Wic to use for a small business setup along with asterisk. I want to
provide redundancy between my VOIP provider and telco, or between two VOIP
providers. Also my plans are to setup VLANS to separate internal voice
traffic and regular data traffic using a cisco 2900 switch. Is the 2621
overkill for 5-7
2006 Nov 16
0
call from cisco router to asterisk gets auto attendant
Folks,
I have a NEC 2400 pbx(non-voip) behind a Cisco 3725, connected via
standard wic-t1 card. The NEC needs to call two different asterisk
servers with 4 digits. I have two way calling working with the one * box,
but the other is perplexing me.
Here's the layout
* <--> Cisco 2811(192.168.13.1) <--> 1.54 point to point <- Cisco
3725(192.168.8.1)<-> NEC 2400.
The
2003 Oct 15
2
skinny problem
has anyone seen this?
-- Starting Skinny session from 192.168.13.102
-- Starting Skinny session from 192.168.13.102
triton*CLI> Oct 15 13:44:05 WARNING[213019]: File chan_skinny.c, Line 2243 (get_input): Skinny Client sent less data than expected.
Oct 15 13:44:05 NOTICE[213019]: File chan_skinny.c, Line 2301 (skinny_session): Skinny Session returned: Success
Oct 15 13:44:05
2004 Jan 11
1
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] More Success on the Cisco 7920 and SCCP !!!!!
Hi Siggi,
> > 7960 and then "Call Ended" on the Display (curious about that !!!).
>
> That seems to be normal for the 7920. I've sniffed the registration
> procedure with Cisco's newest 3.3(3) CallManager (+patches), and it's
> doing the same thing. Maybe that's some odd way of testing if the
> CallManager ("CCM") really works...
>