similar to: Changing NICE value for * will it help?

I have 4 gig in my * box. I'm tuning for performance and I'd like to ask opinions: 1. asterisk -p == renice -20 ?? 2. I've turned off swap with no apparent ill effects. Can anyone commment on long term effects with moderate load (say, 30 SIP phones / 2-3K calls /day) 3. Can anyone comment on using ramdisk as swap and whether this is a good idea or bad idea? I'm using 2.6

> -----Original Message----- > From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:gilad@codefidence.com] > I'm prbably stupid, but wont this do what you want? > > > exten => 1,1,Goto(bye,s,1) No, because I wanted to match on "D", not "1". Anyway, I figured it out. The extension was working, but Background() ignores the tones A through D by default. I didn't

Redhat 9 is running 100% cpu usage. I had a couple boxes doing this. upgraded to Fedora and its ok.

BR C.

> -----Original Message----- > From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] > Okay, the problem appears to be that I'm tone deaf. ;) > > I finally thought to turn on debugging on the channel. The > PBX is sending > "D", not "*". The programmer of the previous voice mail system (whose > configuration I was cribbing from) seems to have

Hello, I use Asterisk 1.0.2 on a RedHat Enterprise Server 3.0 (Kernel 2.4.21) and i experienced that the memory consumption of the asterisk-process started by the init.d-script raises continously. Now, after 3 hours of operation (on our testing-system we have 30 concurrent connections to another asterisk box using IAX2 and GSM codec) there is already 66MB allocated. I think this could be ok, but

For an office that is using VoIP phones to connect to Asterisk, is gigabit ethernet really necessary for the Asterisk box to connect to the switch? I know that I won't even approach the limits of 100 Mbps, but would gigabit help with latency / collisions when several calls are underway? The fact is, anything going outside the office will be over a data T1, so intuition tells me that 100

At time to time somebody is trying "their luck" and send me most likely a junk fax on my voice line. During normal working hours is not a problem I just pickup the line and hangup the call but after-hours my voice mailbox is intercepting the call and recording those "beeps" (waisting my CPU cycles). Is there a way to block call / issue hangup command if the incoming call is a

Hi everyone, This is off topic and is for GS technical support really but it seems that there are a lot of Budge Tone 100/101/102 users out there. I've got a Budge Tone-100 (101 - without the extra 10base ethernet connetion?) here. I changed the configuration through its web based interface and I clicked the reboot link. But then something went wrong and ever since then it doesn't

from voip-info wiki Asterisk automatic daily restart To automatically restart Asterisk you can add something like this to cron # Restart Asterisk PBX once a day to prevent any problems from piling up 10 7 * * * root /usr/sbin/asterisk -rx "restart now" >/dev/null 2>&1 or 10 7 * * * root /usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x "restart gracefully" >/dev/null 2>&1

Had a good question for the list, it seems whenever I work in an Asterisk console or on the machine normally I get jitters on any audio going through it. Especially if you did file copies or a 'ps ax' for example. I was wondering if there was a proper way to 'nice' the asterisk proc's? Cisco does this for example to it's "EXEC" and icmp processes, I tried

Is there any script guru on the list that can help me. I'm trying to start asterisk with nice -5. Normally the command would be: nice -5 asterisk but asterisk start from the scrip on Gentoo as -U asterisk -G asterisk Here is the script: =============== depend() { need net use zaptel } start() { local OPTS USER GROUP if [[ -n "${ASTERISK_NICE}" ]];

While trying to apply the low-latency kernel patches to our RHv9 Linux 2.4.20-31.9, the patches would not apply. In comparing one of the first patch files (lowlatency.h) to that already on the system, it would appear the low latency patches were already applied by RH. The original RHv9 file (lowlatency.h) even had the patch author's name/credit in it. Does anyone know whether RH made an

----- Forwarded message from Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> ----- From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> Organization: Codefidence ltd. A name you can trust. To: Linux-IL <linux-il@linux.org.il> Subject: [Announcement] Asterisk-IL mailing list X-Bogosity: Unsure [50.0%] X-listar-version: Listar v0.124a X-original-sender: gilad@benyossef.com X-list: linux-il

I wonder if someone could point me to the appropriate docs for my question? If I would like to cause my system to always start 'smbd' processes at priority 7 for example, how would I go about doing that. I'm assuming there's a better way than running a cronjob every minute to renice existing processes. I'd appreciate some help pointing me in the right direction. Thanks.

Do I have any other options besides RH 9.0 ? Best Regards, Alex Brecher Visit us at http://www.Successfulhosting.com <http://www.successfulhosting.com/> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041128/ac580fa1/attachment.htm

Hi, I have unpleasent short audio gaps when a perl based agi scripts starts. Thus, I now started to put all those things in C programmed daemons for fast-agi. Anyway I'm looking for another mean, which would help me more quickly. I noticed, that all agi scripts are running with system priority -11, like asterisk does. This is really waste of priority. I would like to have the AGI scripts

Hi all, Is it possible to use the 'renice' option together with parallel clusters of type 'PSOCK'? The help page for parallel::makeCluster is not specific about which options are supported on which types and I am getting the following message when passing renice = 19 : > cl <- parallel::makeCluster(2, renice = 19) nice: ?+19?: No such file or directory Kind regards,

Hi Henrik, Thanks for the detailed in fast reply! My guess would be that the confusion comes from the different use of nice and renice. The workraund you provided work fine! Thanks a lot. Best, Andreas Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> writes: > Looks like a bug to me due to wrong assumptions about 'nice' > arguments, but could be because a

Looks like a bug to me due to wrong assumptions about 'nice' arguments, but could be because a "non-standard" 'nice' is used. If we do: > trace(system, tracer = quote(print(command))) Tracing function "system" in package "base" we see that the system call used is: > cl <- parallel::makePSOCKcluster(2L, renice = 19) Tracing system(cmd, wait