similar to: SIP response 302 "Moved Temporarily "

A little off-topic: I have the following hardware: 2610 XM NM-2V VIC-2BRI NT/TE IOS loaded: flash:c2600-ipvoice-mz.123-5d.bin" I get the following error while booting: %C542-1-UNKNOWN_VIC: VNM(1), vic daughter card has an unknown id of FF Is the VIC-2BRI compatible with the 2610XM? What IOS needs to be loaded? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2641/products_tech_note0918

2 new Cisco 7960 phones are requesting a CTLSEP file, seems like I triggered the universal application loader. I want to load the sip image 7.2 According to this Cisco information: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/voicesw/ps4967/products_upgr ade_guides09186a008022a968.html#wp1047292 If the CTLSEP MAC file is not present or is empty, the phone proceeds in nonsecure mode with the

Compiled Asterisk from FreeBSD port (0.9.0_2) When I start asterisk it uses 100% cpu. Searches on Google say to comment the noload => chan_oss.so in modules.conf But this is already commented. Make.conf contains some optimizations. modules.conf: ; Asterisk configuration file ; ; Module Loader configuration file ; [modules] autoload=yes ; ; If you want, load the GTK console right away. ;

This for the archives in case it may help someone: I was able to upgrade two Cisco 7940's from firmware P0030301MFG2 to SIP 7.1 as follows: 1. Installed 7.1 images from the Cisco zip file to the TFTP server. 2. Specified "image_version: P0S3-07-1-00" in SIP<MAC>.cnf and SIPDefault.cnf 3. For the older of the two phones, renamed P003-07-1-00.bin to P0S3-07-.bin, making it

Hi, I am sorry if this message has been reposted, but for some reason I am having problems with posting it. I configured asterisk and zaptel modules with fedora2. I want to be able to load the zaptel wcfxo and wcfxs modules. For now I will use only the Wildcard TDM400P card. I am able to load the modules but I cant configure them using ztcfg or zttool because the tools are compiled to use the

Hello, I 'm looking for a way to pass the '302 moved temporarily' received from the SIP device back to the SIP provider. Here is the setup: Some SIP phones are connected to an Asterisk System version 1.8. External connection to the public network is also done via SIP to a VoIP provider. Phone A has a CFW all calls to a phone number in public network (Mobile Phone) incoming call to

Dear All. I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule. The only way that looks like what I need is # ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3 But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?! No other syntax works. For example more logically correct not IP2 AND not IP3 or even not { IP2 or IP3 } are

Hello I have a PC with 2 IPs publics IP1 in eth0 and IP2 in eth0:0 I want to do a redirection of IP2 to an other public IP IP3 in an other laptop (other network) - for all ports : IP2 ---> IP3 - for juste www : IP2:www --> IP3:www i tried many combination with shorewall-3.0.7-4, but no sucess no help from google, Thanks in advance Laurent

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

Hi All, I''m a big user of the LARTC document but am currently stuck with a question around section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) in relation to "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". I''m wanting to do a similar setup to the diagram where I have - lets just say for the moment - two uplink providers where I want to route over two

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

I''m using Debian (sarge) I do now have 2 ISP, one DSL and one cabel. I want to use the DSL as my primary and only use the cabel-modem if the DSL fails. The setup is: IP1 -> Router -> NAT_IP1 -> eth0 -> eth2 (LAN) IP2 -> Cable-Modem -> eth1 -> eth2 (LAN) I wrote the following in my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from NAT_IP1 lookup 1 ip route add

I have a simple script: #!/bin/bash # index=0 total=0 names=() ip=() while read -r LINE do NODENAME=` echo $LINE | cut -f 1 -d ','` IP=` echo $LINE | cut -f 2 -d ','` names[index]="$NODENAME" ip[index]="$IP" index=`expr index+1` total=`expr total+1` done <<< $(cat list.txt) simple file: more list.txt name1,ip1 name2,ip2 name3,ip3 output when

Hi, In log I get: ----------------------------------------------------------- Sep 30 16:19:03 host kernel: Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 SRC=ip1 DST=ip2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=118 ID=27279 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=51501 DPT=25 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Even in /etc/shorewall/rules I have

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

Hello all, I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and eth1 - LAN). I''ve established a VPN connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine => tun0 interface. I want half of my LAN to have Internet access through the eth0 interface and the other half through the tun0 interface. I''ve set up a script like the "load balancing split access" instructions

I need to set up following network architecture : Internet ^ +-----------------+ | +------------------+ | Centos6-1 | | | Centos6-2 | | +---- eth0 + ----+ | | | (br0)| | | | | +---- eth1 +----------------+

Hello, I am making a HTB script for a few people and I wanted to ask a question. Now I have a nice script with this hierarchy of classes. root(128/128) +---WWW(32/128) +---Default(32/128) +---P2P(1/64) #P2P Programs like DC and Kazza +---.... How should I implement limiting the speed of some users (by IP addresses)? I had an idea, but it looks too compicated. What do you think?

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :