similar to: Re: List proposition

>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004, Adam Greenbaum <lists@refinitive.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 20:26, ~mg@a.org wrote: >> > > Hello everyone! >> > > >> > > We have been thinking about something<early snip> >> > >> > With respect, this could have come from anyone... and looks like it >> > did from the DNS

I'm working with the final details of the Astricon agenda. I haven't got anything so far on Asterisk GUI's and there are plenty of projects out there. I would like to invite developer's of Asterisk GUI's, both open source and commercial, to participate. What I'm thinking of is giving each GUI a slot of 10-15 minutes for a presentation and then a panel discussion on the GUI

Hi List! any body use www.simpletelecom.com? I subscribe to www.simpletelecom.com for A-Z termination and paid US$15.00 and US$70.00 via credit card in two days, but my account has US$15.00 only. I checked my credit card from the bank and they said me the payment already paid to merchant. I've lost US$70.00 :( so anyone here has experience with them? are they a SCAM? Thanks! </Madhawa>

Hi all, I am kind of stuck of using Predict function in R to make prediction for a model with continuous variable and categorial variables. i have no problem making the model, the model is e.g. cabbage.lm2<- lm(VitC ~ HeadWt + Date + Cult) HeadWt is a continuous variable, Date and Culte are factors. Date have three levels inside (d16,d20,d21), Cult has two levels(c39,c52). I need to

Hi R users, I sent a message yesterday about NA in model estimates ( http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-set-lm-to-don-t-return-NA-in-summary-td3722587.html). If I use aov() instead of lm() I get no NA in model estimates and I use gmodels::estimable() without problems. Ok! Now I'm performing a lot of contrasts and I need correcting for multiplicity. So, I can use multcomp::glht() for this.

On 17 Mar 2018, at 14:48, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Context: I have been packaging the llvm toolchain for Debian & Ubuntu > and also providing these packages on https://apt.llvm.org/. > One of the goal is to have different versions co-installable. For that, > I am renaming the binaries and libraries. > > Now, as we are not

Hello, On 17/03/2018 15:22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 17 Mar 2018, at 14:48, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Context: I have been packaging the llvm toolchain for Debian & Ubuntu >> and also providing these packages on https://apt.llvm.org/. >> One of the goal is to have different versions co-installable. For that,

hello list, I subscribe to Sixtel.net for a DID just to see how it worked. they say DID active inmediatly , but after 4 days , I have no DID , I tried to call tech support office and it seems they all ways are in hollidays, a support ticket no good luck, I call back service also not good luck. so anyone here has experience with them? are they a SCAM? fortunally only put there $10 bucks but

Hello, Context: I have been packaging the llvm toolchain for Debian & Ubuntu and also providing these packages on https://apt.llvm.org/. One of the goal is to have different versions co-installable. For that, I am renaming the binaries and libraries. Now, as we are not using the minor version (the Y in X.Y.Z), there isn't much point in calling our tools foo-7.0 as we won't create a

Hello, Object of my mail : 1/ stick a problem of incompatibylity between 2 patches (fileflags.diff & detect-renamed.diff) 2/ proposition of a correction I wanted to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option. I therefore tried to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff But the patch detect-renamed.diff is

Ming-Wei Shih wrote (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk) > I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586 > and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60 2x450/1GB RAM), > they are running great. > > On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box, > some hackings in the Makefiles are needed. Great stuff. Please, can you share your adjustments to the Makefiles with the community?! If you don't

I've paid them, tried to provision numbers, e-mailed support, instant messaged support, and got nowhere. I highly recommend everyone stays away from this provider.

Hello everyone Happy new year . This is the first time I address to the list I have the following situation and I need help from all you people I have dovecot 0.9-11 and i want to migrate to a superior version like dovecot 1.0 looking forward to implement quotas in my system , and use the function deliver with postfix. My Scenario is as follow Dovecot + LDAP (ADS) + postfix My actual

Hi I had asked for some help with the Asterisk Assistants http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+Assistants+for+MacOSX and many have offered assistance with translations which I am grateful for and like to say thank you again. However, there hasn't been a single response from a graphic designer to offer help with a custom icon. Are there any graphic designers on this list at

Hi again Timo, As agreed earlier tonight, you'll find as attachments 4 diffs (diff -u) implementing the new workaround "tb-lsub-flags". The 4 impacted files are: ./src/imap/imap-settings.h ./src/imap/imap-settings.c ./src/imap/cmd-list.c ./src/config/all-settings.c Here is the proposed description for the dovecot.conf file: # tb-lsub-flags: # Usually IMAP servers don't

Vorbis Community, Seeing as how DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD decoders are becoming more accessible, I believe now may be a good time to standardize channel mappings for 6.1 and 7.1 audio. MPlayer currently implements 7.1 audio for Vorbis like so: FL FR RL RR FC LFE SL SR. Thank you, William Swartzendruber -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, and thanks for the feedback. >My own gut feeling on this is that you'd be better off figuring out >how to do this in the context of Faust, which already does a important >subset of what you are describing, though notably without (I think) >the LLVM part. Surely a contribution to the discussion by the Faust people would be welcome; and even more than to the discussion :->.

Good morning, I'm working at Software publishing house which publishes magazines from the IT field. One of them is Linux+ DVD magazine (please visit our web www.lpmagazine.org). I'm looking for the linux developpers who are interrested in cooperation with the redaction of Linux+ DVD by writing the article concerning the scurity in Linux (for exemple OpenBSD 3.8, or to transmit the

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote: > I have been looking for a while to  LLVM as a possible technology to build a > DSP execution engine, providing the runtime flexibility needed by real-time > interactive DSP applications (like patcher languages), or by plug-in based > processors, and in the same moment > the powerful link time

Hi guys, What do you think about this structure: http://wiki.centos.org/FrontPageProposal?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=wiki-structure-5-en.png Cheers, al.