similar to: Compiling HDLC does not Produce hdlc0 for T100p

I got it figured out now. In case anyone else comes across it - this is what I had to do: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 up ***NO IP INFO SET*** Sethdlc hdlc0 create <dlci number> Ifconfig pvc0 <local ip> pointopoint <remote ip> up Then set your default gateway to the <remote ip> listed in pvc0. That's about it!! Hope it helps! -----Original

I'm setting up a T1 for both voice and data and was wanting to know the steps involved. I've recompiled zaptel for ZAPATA_NET support and setup my /etc/zaptel.conf: Fxsks=1-10 Nethdlc=11-24 Modprobe wct1xxp works fine and my voice lines work. Now when I use the provided sethdlc, I use the following commands: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 <ipaddress> <network>

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

All, I'm having a heck of a time getting hdlc to work on kernel 2.6.11.9 .. I compiled hdlc, hdlc_gen, hdlc_cisco, hdlc_raw, into the kernel (note into, and not 'modules'). System comes up, I configured zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-24 modprobe wct4xxp ztcfg sethdlc hdlc0 cisco ifconfig hdlc0 up All of this works fine, believe it or not. I have a T1 cross plugged

Hello all, My set up is a fractionated t1, with 1-6 voice channels, 21-24 data channels. I have a t100P installed in a amd 1500 with 512meg. Question: In order to set up the data channels, is the following correct? 1) compile new kernel with generic hdlc support 2) compile hdlc from hq.pm.waw.pl/hdlc 3) uncomment KFLAGS+=DConfig_ZAPATA_NET in zaptel makefile 4) compile zaptel, 5 compile rest

I have my Linux 2.6 kernel with the necessary HDLC config and also recompiled zaptel accordingly. On modprobe, I get: Found a Wildcard: Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2000 in_atomic():0[expected: 0], irqs_disabled():1 [<0211e605>] __might_sleep+0x82/0x8c [<02144643>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0x57 [<42ad7a2c>]

Hello All, I am battling a problem I don't know how to fix... Here is the scenario: Fractionated T1 with 1-6 channels voice, 21-24 channels data. Comes into a box with Digium T100P, splits off data channes with HDLC, to devicec pvc0, This works fine, but I have a routing problem getting to my machines! Here is the current set up... sethdlc hdlc0 fr lmi ansi sethdlc hdlc0 create 44

Hello everyone, We have recently turned up a new T1 from McLeod (Midwestern CLEC). It is configured like so: /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=us defaultzone=us span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs ;(also tried 1,1,0,esf,b8zs) bchan=13-23 nethdlc=1-12 dchan=24 /etc/zapata.conf: switchtype=national context=pri-in signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel => 13-23 I can get hdlc0 (and pvc0) up just fine after the

Hello! I want to use TE121 for E1 data link to cisco. Really only for tests now. So I wrote: span = 1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 #span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-31:hdlc0 may be first line is wrong, problem is somewhere else anyway. Just because I get: # dahdi_cfg DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Function not implemented (38) This is centos 6.4 box with dahdi 2.7.0.1. Could you tell me is it

Greetings- I'm wondering if the Digium PRI cards can be used for data (Cisco HDLC, PPP, etc) or if they're for voice circuits only. I haven't been able to find any information on this. All documentation direct from Digium seems to indicate their hardware is for voice applications only. Sangoma's cards work in either voice or data mode but of course this is configured in their

Hello all, We have a TE405P set up with span 1 running to a channel bank, a PRI running into span 2, and a PPP internet T1 running into span 3. We have the first 2 spans up and running without a problem. We have hdlc compiled into the kernel and after making the appropriate changes to zaptel.conf and loading the zaptel, wct4xxp, and hldc modules we can bring up the third span with the internet

dev seems to be slow to respond, so maybe someone here has accomplished this... I''m trying to bridge an hdlc0 interface to a guest, but I believe the network-scripts only support eth* devices. Any clue on how to get my hdlc0 p-t-p link interface bridged? Any tap suggestions/syntax? Simply adding hdlc0 with brctl is incorrect syntax. Thanks in advance. -Cody Tubbs Systems Analyst

??I would like to apply a function, fract, to the columns of a dataframe. I tried the following apply(data5NonEventEpochs,2,fract) but, no surprise it did not work as apply works on matrices not data frames. How can I apply a fuction to the columns of a data frame? (I can't covert data5NonEventsEpochs to a matrix as it contains character data). Thank you, John John David Sorkin M.D., Ph.D.

I am attempting to deploy a TE210P with one port configured (all 24 channels) as Cisco HDLC, currently running 2.6.11 FC4 with HDLC module compiled. HDLC (RAW) appears to work fine, however, using Cisco HDLC (via sethdlc & sethdlc-new) results in no traffic being encapsulated or transmitted via the hdlc0 interface. Is there anybody here currently running a similar configuration on a

I need to know how to setup the data side of the T1 on my Linux Box. I have found information about configuring a PRI and HDLC but nothing about the Frame-Relay type setup for data. The following is information from our T1 provider. Network T1: Framing = ESF Line code = B8ZS Build out = 0-133ft(DSX)/0dB(CSU) Clock = network Pulse-density-enforce = off alarm-option = on alarm-delay = 15

Hi, I believe the issues raised by this message are the same as mine, more on a commercial sense than for self use, but mostly the same. I've seen posts where real-life installations are mentioned, but not a reference to how Asterisk is working on production (and productive) environments. Any experiences would be very welcome I believe, not only on pure technical, but wider, sense. Thanks

After speaking with several people, and even participating in a forum of several other people with echo issues, I thought I'd share what we've done (well actually what our chief R&D engineer, Brett Bourn has done...) First let me say that normal cheapy PC hardware couldn't be made to function with out echo. We tried on both the single port Digium T1 card and the 4 port Digium T1

Hello, I contacted Krzysztof Halasa, the maintainer of the current sethdlc code. This is the response he gave me. Of course, I have this working now. Still some minor configuration to do, but It does work, and the connections to the internet are _much_ faster than when I went through the adtran... I would highly recommend to anyone with a fractionated T1, with data and voice channels to

Hey gang, I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1. I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table: [root@asterisk root]# route

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.