similar to: Cisco Support Agreements

I just tried to order the CON-SNT-CP7960 part from CDW. This is the ~$8 1yr support contract that's supposed to give access to the Cisco download site for firmware for the 7960 . wellll, I got a call from CDW saying that Cisco wouldn't authorize them to sell that product to me. The sales rep conferenced me in with the CDW Cisco person and he explained that CON-SNT-CP7960 is an

Hi all, Happy Wednesday! Got a 7940G off eBay to tinker with and, per the wiki, contacted Cisco about a service contract. Being just little ol' me, they won't deal directly and blew me off (I hate dealing with Cisco, Nortel, etc as a small-business person...) Again per the wiki, I hit CDW.com and found CON-SNT-CP7960 for $9.14. Looking for support for the 7940 (not 7960), I just

> I too contacted CDW about the $9.37 Cisco support > contract. But because I did not buy my phone from them I was > not allowed to purchase it. The vendor I bought the phone > from does not provide them. What are the "magic words" to > get CDW to sell it to you? With all of this hassle I highly > doubt that I will buy more Cisco phones anyway. After >

The CDW part number is: 672205 And the cisco part number is: CON-SNT-CP7960 Hope this helps... In fact I think I will add it to the Wiki. ~c ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:40:38 -0500 From: "W. Kevin Hunt" <Kevin@hbcorporate.com> Subject: RE: Cisco Downloads --> was --> Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 andAsterisk...not working... To:

G'Day All; So I purchased a Cisco 7960 and am now trying to get it configured for *. No can do without the variuos files/images through a FTPF server. I configured the TFTP server on my RHES 3 box, now to get the required CISCO files. So I contacted CISCO to purchase the required maintenance contract so as to gain access to the download area for the files/images. -WHAT A FRUSTRATION!!-

I'm in the UK and have had terrible trouble getting the right contract. After looking on voip-info I set off looking for a vendor only to find that no-one sells the $9 contract. Cisco retracted that one :-( I asked for the equivalent and they said I needed a ?20 contract. I said fine but after 20 minutes or so got a call saying I couldn't have that one as it didn't give me access

Thanks everyone for your feedback, especially Mark. I now have the ALL the files I need. My order still stands for the $8.00 product from CISCO but the CP7960 dealer sent me all the files. Now I will move on to completeing the setup of the TFTP server. Thanks again -----Original Message----- From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mloftis@wgops.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 7:51 PM To:

Hi, I have already asked a similar question twice without response on the r-help list https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-June/200300.html but this list might be more appropriate. If there is a particular reason for the lacking answers (unclear, missing information, the solution is obvious to everyone except me, etc), I would like to know. The description below is generalized, but I

Dear R devels, let's say I have three packages "pkg1", "pkg2" and "pkg3" which all contain new S4 classes and methods. Where "pkg3" depends on "pkg2" and "pkg2" depends on "pkg1". Moreover, all three packages have namespaces. 1) I use ".onLoad <- function(lib, pkg) require(methods)". Do I also have to

I am trying to re-organizing my Makefile for testing my R packages and I am having trouble finding a structure I like. The problem seems to be that "R CMD check", which does wonderful things, does not allow dependency information to flow through very gracefully. That is, since everything is copied into the pkg.Rcheck directory, it is difficult to make any changes to source files without

Hi, I have built two R packages. One of them (PKG1) needs to use the functions of the other package (PKG2). So I need to link these two packages together, so that the functions of PKG2 can be available to PKG1. And when I load one package using 'library("PKG1")', PKG2 can be loaded at the same. Any ideas welcome. -- View this message in context:

Hello, unfortunately I had to compile latest version of R-2.0.1 by myself. I'd rather would prefer vendors binaries but since the current version of Ubuntu defaults to 1.9.x I had to compile R on my own in order to be up to date! So far, everything went fine and R runs smoothly. Unfortunately I am not able to use R CMD INSTALL command to install add-on packages. I followed RNews 3/3 and

Hi, (I tried looking for it, but I don't think it was discussed before... or maybe I didn't use the correct keywords). I have a package (say, pkg1), which uses NAMESPACE. This package contains a bunch of functions the are used internally, therefore they're not exported (say, internalFunc1). Even though internalFunc1 is not exported, I can access it externally using

Hi list, Sorry for the vague title, but here is the scenario. I?m writing an R package, let?s say, ?pkg1?, which contains 3 functions: f1, f2, f3. f2 and f3 are helper functions for f1, i.e. f1 calls f2 which in turn calls f3. f1 <- function(?) { ?. f2() ? } f2 <- function(?){ ? f3(?) ? } f3 <- function(...){ .... } Then, I wrote a new version of f3 and I want to

I am being asked to modernize the Depends line in the DESCRIPTION file of some packages. Writing R Extensions says: The general rules are Packages whose namespace only is needed to load the package using library(pkgname) must be listed in the ?Imports? field and not in the ?Depends? field. Packages listed in imports or importFrom directives in the NAMESPACE file should

Hi, I want to cross-reference from the documentation of pkg1 to pkg2, which is imported in the NAMESPACE of pkg1, and under Depends in DESCRIPTION of pkg1. According to "Writing R extensions", this can be done by: \code{\link{foo}} when foo is an aliased function in the documentation of pkg2. This works as it should when I install the package, but when I run R CMD check pgk1, I get

can you please share the cdw part # for the $ 10 service contract ? W. Kevin Hunt CCIE #11841 MCSE, Linux+ SME www.huntbrothers.com > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Christopher Jacob > Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 9:51 PM > To:

I have a 100MB internal lan. aastra's are wired. asterisk box is wired next to the switch. But look: sip show peers ........ 142/142 10.10.10.42 D A 5060 OK (137 ms) 144/144 10.10.10.44 D A 5060 OK (136 ms) 145/145 10.10.10.45 D A 5060 OK (168 ms) 150/150 10.10.10.50

Hi, I''ve been successfully using shorewall in our K12 school since the 2.x days initially on Mandrake and now on Debian. Because of that my config has got quite complicated. The firewall has a working MultiISP setup with four interfaces (I''ve renamed them with udev to easy their identification): lan-if, dmz-if, snt-if and dnt-if (one of the providers (the one on dnt-if) is a DSL

Am 23.06.2020 10:07, schrieb Marek Greško: Hi > this is a correct response: > > From 62.156.246.57 (62.156.246.57) icmp_seq=1 Frag needed and DF set > (mtu = 1492) > > So PMTU discovery is working. No problem here. You got correct message > to lower the packet size from 62.156.246.57. This is probably the last > hop before your site. No, the last hop is 62.156.246.65: