similar to: Lost 7960 time display on upgrade

I search Google to find how to get the message light to flash on my Cisco 7960 running (Application Load ID POS3-06-3-00) (Boot Load ID PC03M030) (DSP Load ID PS03AT38) All I see is about the sip.conf file witch mine has the mailbox=XXXX but still no light. Also the messages button does not work. Any ideas?

My cell vm goes to asterisk, not the carrier. Apparently MWI is turned on/off with specially formatted SMS messages. Anyone know how to do this on a Treo 600? Having the phone light from Asterisk would be HUGE ... not to mention extremely cool. dbc.

Asterisk as a phone system makes perfect sense in a condo. You can get all the DID's you want and eliminate costs for the owners. You can offer standard FXO for people who don't care and IP sets for people who want to "upgrade" to feature sets. Your door openner is a piece of cake. 1. Create an option in your dialplan only in the "from-access-door" context that reads

Hello, My Cisco phone has software: Boot Load: PC030300 Ver: 3.2(7.0) And I want to upgrade it to SIP 6.0 Is it possible or I have to upgrade to ealier then 6.0 and then to 6.0 ? bart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031121/7331dff5/attachment.htm

I have three questions about my 7960 phone that I can't discern from the docs/wiki. 1st - If I change the SIPxxxxxx.cnf file to change registrations it sets up new lines as expected. If I delete a line it doesn't get removed when I reboot the phone. I have to go to the phone, unlock it, and reset the SIP parameters. How do I make it "forget" what it has programmed and

Kevin Walsh noted that his SPA-2000 takes time from his local NTP server in a post back on Fri June 25. Q: Where do you tell it to use NTP? I'm a bit confused as to where my SPA-2000 is currently getting its time. I told it GMT-5 in the misc section but it doesn't really tell me where its going for this. Is it just broadcasting looking for ntp? The net of my problem is that it is 1 hour

Did the console "Dial" command go away in recent releases? I just went to use is on my server (now at 1.0) and its gone. Help from the CLI doen't show it. -- David Cook

I'm looking to give the SPA-3000 a whirl as I'm having too much difficulty with the irq sharing thing inside the box. I'm reading the book but without having one in-hand to play with it appears a little obtuse at this time. Before I drop down my money can someone with some hands-on with one of these confirm if the SPA-3000 can: a) detect inbound distinctive ring (this looks to me like

It looks like this meetup group is becoming the venue for contact as most "Toronto" respondents have signed up here. Can I request that the remainder who responded to the "Toronto" call signup? Shidan is the organizer and has proposed a date. I'd hate to confirm it without the remainder having input - especially those with travel times like Andrew K. out in Listowel.

> Lito Lampitoc wrote: > > thanks for enlightening. So you mean, if I have 3 lines when the > caller > > dialled the first line and it was busy, the call will be diverted > to the > > next two available lines in random? > > > > I don't think it's random. I think its just sequential. If main > line > is busy, try second. If that is

I am still haveing problems (echo) with my X100P but I'm thinking it has more to do with the server it is in which is not a negotiable item at this time. My question then is to the use of SPA3000's as a replacement from the FXO standpoint. 1. Can you setup the FXO port to recognize distinctinve ring and call a different context like you can do with Zap channels? Being able to call a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1447 Bug ID: 1447 Summary: Conntrack marks ICMPv6 multicast and anycast ping responces as invalid. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

> From: Ronald Wiplinger <ronald@elmit.com> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Is there hardware to remote control > available? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <41C6D43F.5070201@elmit.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > I am looking for a

I've got a Cisco 7960 that I'm trying to convert to SIP. Here's what "Firmware Versions" says: App Load ID: P00305000300 Boot Load ID: PC03M030 Version: 5.0(3.0) The files that I have are: P003-07-1-00.sbn P003-07-1-00.bin P0S3-07-1-00.loads P0S3-07-1-00.sb2 If I put "P003-07-1-00" in OS79XX.TXT, the phone tries to tftp XMLDefault.cnf.xml. I've

Hi guys: I am using Tinc to build an overlay network, but I want to control the network topology by myself. So how can I disable the automatic full mash feature of Tinc? Besides, my overlay network is supposed to support anycast and I have a routing algorithm for it. I wonder if it is convenient to implement it in Tinc, and do you have any suggestions for achieving this? Looking forward to your

I am trying to get distinctive ring to work on my PSTN with no luck. I can get 2 different ring codes but it skips the context assigned... here is my complete zapata.conf: [channels] signalling=fxs_ks usecallerid=yes rxgain=1.0 txgain=1.0 language=en context=default usedistinctiveringdetection=yes dring1=134,0,0 dring2=137,0,0 dring1context=internal2 dring2context=default

Hi all, So I have been reading through the docs available online and the different threads on this list, but I cannot seem to get this phone to work. I have configured the OS79XX.TXT and SIP/SEP*.cnf files (see attached), when I configure the phone to point to my tftp server and reboot it I get this message: Connection received from 10.6.0.224 on port 50608 [09/02 12:16:11.750] Read request

I think RR DNS is the only viable solution under these circumstances. If you can cope with the fact that failovers won't be seamless, I don't think there's anything wrong with that though. On 07/21/2015 11:54 AM, Laz C. Peterson wrote: > The consensus seems to say no to RR DNS ? I am going to take that into serious consideration. > > With this proxy setup you describe, what

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:00:39 -0700 James Lott <james at lottspot.com> wrote: > I think RR DNS is the only viable solution under these circumstances. > If you can cope with the fact that failovers won't be seamless, I > don't think there's anything wrong with that though. > > On 07/21/2015 11:54 AM, Laz C. Peterson wrote: > > The consensus seems to say no to

Hi Johnson, You might want to take a look at the IndirectData option, which will prevent tinc from trying to directly reach nodes it doesn't have a direct metaconnection to, using other nodes as intermediaries instead. On 15 October 2017 at 16:34, Johnson Li <johnsonli1993 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys: > > I am using Tinc to build an overlay network, but I want to control