similar to: Experiance of shipping into the UK

I've just installed a Digitnetworks X100P clone in my * server and run the install script for the voicepet-single-x100p tarball. The install appeared to run OK with modprobe wcfxo successful and the ztcfg reporting "Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)". When I try to start * though I get a segmentation fault after loading res_features.so. I discovered that the

Hello Folks, I'm trying to decide here between a few cards for connecting an Asterisk box to a single E1 channel (either PRI or R2 signaling): - Digium E100P: has been replaced by the TE110P below, but can still be had at places like digitnetworks.com for $475, and I guess there's always a place for good-olde-obsolete cards in the world as long as they work :-) - Digium TE110P:

Dear All. I'm very new to CT, but attracted by asterisk. I plan to start learn to build IVR, based on asterisk. Do I need FXO/FXS card to start building simple IVR box ? Can I use OEM X100P - FXO PCI Card ( http://www.digitnetworks.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=28 ) to start build an IVR box ? What is the cheapest FXO PCI card that can use with asterisk to build my first IVR box ?

Hi: I had an fxo card from Digitnetworks and it was working fine on my Asterisk box. I then replaced it with TDM04B. I changed the zaptel and zapata to include the four channels. When I run ztcfg, I get configuration errors: Channel map: Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04:

Hi List, I've got * randomly hanging up on inbound or outbound calls on zap channels. I use a Digitnetworks X100P clone card. Any idea of what might be happening? Cheers, Jean-Michel.

I am putting together my first *. I had it running with two other pc's running xlite and setup voicemail and a couple of menus and submenus and had that running well. I had order a couple of oem x100p cards from digitnetworks. I installed them as they said with their voicepet2.2.zip drivers and did the modprobe on zaptel and wcfxo and then ran ztcfg -vv and got this: Zaptel Configuration

Hello, I just bought a X100P from digitnetworks. It is supposed to be a FXO card, but there are 2 rj-11 plug on the card. One is labelled "phone" and the other "pstn". When i plug the "pstn" on the wall and the "phone" on my analog phone, everything (incoming and outgoing calls) works like before (without asterisk). AFAIU, i should have an FXS card in my

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:33:31PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, str_btrfs); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, "subvolume"); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, "get-default"); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, fs_buf); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, NULL); > + > + r = commandv (&out, &err, argv); > + if (r == -1) { > + reply_with_error ("%s: %s",

Hi there, I know this question is kind of stupid. But, I don't know anywhere else to ask. I've received some answers when I asked about the need of having a zaptel interface to make the meetme application work, that said that it was better to have a real hardware then the zaptelrtc software modules. So, my question is, would any of the following cards work with the meetme

Hi, I've purchased two x100p clones, and when I try accessing a line from asterisk with something like this: exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Dial(Zap/2/{$EXTEN}) (is that only supposed to put you on channel 2 or actually dial the # for you?) but I first hear noise, then a dial tone, but as soon as I start dialing numbers I get feedback and noise, and the call doesn't go through. Any

On 23/11/2014 09:39, peter dalgaard wrote: > >> On 23 Nov 2014, at 01:05 , Henrik Bengtsson <hb at biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch >> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 22/11/2014, 2:59 PM, Stuart Ambler wrote: >>>> A colleague?s R program behaved differently when I ran it, and we

once taken that stat/stat64 appart, histedit appears to be a minefield: usr/dash/histedit.c:59: error: expected ?=?, ?,?, ?;?, ?asm? or ?__attribute__? before ?*? token usr/dash/histedit.c:60: error: expected ?=?, ?,?, ?;?, ?asm? or ?__attribute__? before ?*? token usr/dash/histedit.c: In function ?histedit?: usr/dash/histedit.c:82: error: ?hist? undeclared (first use in this function)

Sorry - noob-ish question.. I have been having problems on a CentOS 4.2 server following an upgrade to the latest version of SugarCRM (segfaults in Apache and some functions not working). Someone has just posted in the SugarCRM forums that they had exactly the same problems on CentOS 4.2 and they fixed them by upgrading from PHP 4.3.9 to 5.0.5. Being a more cautious chap, I'd like to try an

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2155 Bug ID: 2155 Summary: sftp program has tty attributes setting problem Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi, Just thought I'd mention that I spent a while battling with tinc today. I had quite a weird behaviour - in routing mode, tinc would come up fine on both hosts, but pinging hosta from hostb wouldn't work until hosta pinged hostb. I've used an earlier version of tinc before in a different environment with no problems, and vaguely remembered a more complicated tinc-up script, so I

I did some tests: ### Theora support in Firefox 3.7a (missnamed as "Minefield"): Same as since 3.5 (plays, no controls if Javascript off, no thorough retest of buffering issues). http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/2010-January/003369.html http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449358 ### WeBM support in Firefox 3.7a Seems to play (controls bug of course also there) and

Digium X100P / new cards are is available on ebay for $43. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3073050567&category=3309 <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3073050567&category=3309 > Hope this helps to who want to play with X100P! Are these being sold by Digium ? I don't know ?? - SamW -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

The specific standards process used to develop the MPEG codecs creates patent minefields that royalty-free codecs don't generally face. Because many knowledgeable people have heard of the problems faced by these patent-soup standards, they may extrapolate these risk to codecs developed under a different process where these problems are less considerable. This is a mistake, and I'll explain

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi, > > [Synopsis: Mikael thinks Windows support is overlooked and that this is a > strategic error. ...] > Synopsis of my response: It is not overlooked, it has some technical, non-technical, and manpower limitations. Allow me to briefly summarize these issues: Technical: Currently, we have

I have several of incoming numbers on IAX from voiptalk and magrathea but have a problem with IAX.conf. If I follow the example from voiptalk [VoIPTalk Incoming Number] type=friend username=VoIPTalk Incoming Number context=[XXXXXXXX] and make incoming entries in IAX.conf for the numbers like below with a different entry for each number pointing to a different context, incoming numbers always