similar to: RAID affecting X100P performance...

hi all, What is the best Asterisk-compliant for Dell machine is recommended? I will have roughly 400 users in a production office. thanks!!

Has anyone seen this problem before? I have a server with a single X100P card. The audio level is a low, but if I raise the gain to more than -2db (Rx + Tx) it starts to oscillate in an echo test. Not at a high frequency but with a noise that is best described as a steam engine starting up. It then starts to clip and crackle. If I bring the gain down to Rx=-2.0 and Tx=0.0 or lower then it settles

We have recently started making more frequent use of the meetme conference of our * system. We are using v1.0.8 with a 2.6.11 kernel on our system. We generally have 4 callers in it: two with the gsm codec and 2 with g729. Initially, the conference works fine and there is little latency. After about 15min., though, the latency is very noticable and by 25min it's unbearable. If we all leave

I installed this card, everything work, i can make call and receive call with no echo and great sound quality, but after between 5 to 50 secs the call disconnect by itself, in the log i don't see nothing revelant. I don't share any IRQ, zttest show me values between 99.98 and 100. The only thing i see, the pstn line is not realy a true pstn line, it's plugged in an Arris Telephony

Your Zap conf files would be helpful. Zttest results? Cat /proc/interrupts. Sharing interrupts? Any funky error in the logs? Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Administrator TOOTAI > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:24 AM

Guys. I have an issue with a te110p card and also some tdm04b cards on the same system: Zttest returns this for the tdm04b cards: [root@mollendo ~]# /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.4/zttest 38 -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples

I was browsing the applications developed in zaptel and came across zttest. After I run it, I get the following: Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 100.000000% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.975586% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%

I just added a second X100P card to my * server, altough it seems to be working * seems to be ignoring it: zaptel.conf: ----------------- fxsks=1-2 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf: ------------------ context=inbound-analog signalling=fxs_ks group=1 channel => 1 channel => 2 I created a couple of test extensions: ; test extensions

Hi all, Sorry for the OT. I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1. The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either RAID-DP or RAID4. What I want to achieve is Max Storage Capacity, so I change it from RAID-DP to RAID4, but with RAID4, the maximum disk in a RAID Group decrease from 14 to 7. In the end, either using RAID-DP or RAID4, the capacity is the same.

Il 30/01/19 16:49, Simon Matter ha scritto: >> On 01/30/19 03:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 29/01/19 20:42, mark ha scritto: >>>> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>>> Il 29/01/19 18:47, mark ha scritto: >>>>>> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>>>>> Il 29/01/19 15:03, mark ha scritto: >>>>>>>

Firstly, let me just say I am new to asterisk and if anything I've said is covered in an FAQ or in previous posts I apologise but I have tried searching and I've attempted a few of the things I found but they didn't help. Has anybody got any experience using an X100P on an NTL phone line in the UK (I'm in an ex Cable & Wireless area if that makes any difference). The

Hi list! I'm trying to setup a new * server with a TE210P in a Dell 2850 box. I'm using zaptel version 1.2.5, the linux flavour I'm using is CentOS 4. In a previous thread I read about the results I should expect from zttest. On my home box (using the crappy Asus A7V600) I got really bad results from zttest (just over 97.5) but I know that this motherboard just sucks. To my

Hi, I've written two small howtos, and would like to contribute them to the CentOS Wiki. The first one is "How to install CentOS 5 on software partitionable mdadm RAID1", and the second one "How to repair a software mdadm RAID5 with two or more failed disks (if you know that information is still on the disks and readable)". I think that the first one should be somewhere

Hi, I just replaced Slackware64 14.1 running on my office's HP Proliant Microserver with a fresh installation of CentOS 7. The server has 4 x 250 GB disks. Every disk is configured like this : * 200 MB /dev/sdX1 for /boot * 4 GB /dev/sdX2 for swap * 248 GB /dev/sdX3 for / There are supposed to be no spare devices. /boot and swap are all supposed to be assembled in RAID level 1 across

Arch = x86_64 CentOS-6.4 We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in hotswap cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP application and DBMS host. The ERP application will likely eventually have web access but at the moment only dedicated client applications can connect to it. I am researching how to best set this system up for use as a production host

Hi, I'm trying to connect to Telewest/Virgin Media with a TE110P using asterisk 1.4.13/zaptel 1.4.6. No matter what I try, my span always appears as PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active My zapata.conf is currently ----------------------------------- [channels] echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=no echotraining=yes switchtype=euroisdn contect=from-pri signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel

On 01/30/19 03:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 29/01/19 20:42, mark ha scritto: >> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 29/01/19 18:47, mark ha scritto: >>>> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>>> Il 29/01/19 15:03, mark ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>>> I've no idea what happened, but the box I was working on last week

On 06/27/2011 07:46 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:53:37 +0200 Nico Schottelius > <nico-lkml-20110623@schottelius.org> wrote: > >> Good morning devs, >> >> I''m wondering whether the raid- and volume-management-builtin of btrfs is >> actually a sane idea or not. >> Currently we do have md/device-mapper support for raid >>

I''m struggling to get Xen to boot on a FC4 Opteron box. I''ve included the tail of the boot log below [1]. I suspect that the problems relates to the software RAID 1 root and boot partitions, and how it relates to the initrd image. The RAID volumes fail to mount. I compiled the Xen snapshot from the 23rd September, and the only change I''ve made is to enable the

Hi I am trying to build reliable fax solution with asterisk, iaxmodem and hylafax. I am attempting to do this on Compaq DL-360 with 2 pentium 3 1.2GHz (512 cache) and 2GB of RAM. I am using a Sangoma A101. After installing the newest zaptel and wanpipe-3.1.0 beta I did zttest and it didn't give me good results: 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586%