similar to: SIP 2 ISDN

Hello List, I'm from Germany and I want to use a Asterisk System. I have a few Accounts at my SIP-Provider www.sipgate.de and now I want to use my ISDN-Phone on the Sip-System. My idea was i set up a Asterisk-System and i will put in an ISDN Card where I can plug a ISDN Phone, I will have to use an ISDN card with the NT-Mode. The Asterisk has to register is at the SIP Provider and if a Call

Shortly after I subscribed to this Samba list I started receiving numerous emails infected with the Swen/Gibe worm. Many of these emails contained the email addresses of Samba list members. I believe a subscriber of the Samba list has the Swen virus. Has anyone else on this list been getting emails infected with the Swen/Gibe worm? Please update your virus definitions and do a virus scan just to

want to get from SIP to ISDN or from SIP to SIP. I only have a ADSL connection that means 786kb/s downstream and 128kb/s upstream so i can max handle 2 sip calls at once. I want to have 25 Accounts because of the different numbers for the different phones. Good, i wanted to buy a ready built pc from ebay but now i think i will built a 19" rack case so i will built in a 1 - 1,5ghz intel

Hey everyone, I came across a situation where I needed to use CDP to advertise a voice vlan to Polycom/Cisco (and other CDP capable phones) without a Cisco switch. Sure I have Cisco switches in places but I like my Polycoms to work out of the box and it isn't always practical to purchase a Cisco switch for every location. cdp-tools homepage: http://gpl.internetconnection.net/ So I

Hi, i am getting the follwing messages with asterisk 1.0.5 [...] Feb 28 16:13:05 VERBOSE[8899]: !! Unable to handle ROSE operation 34 [...] Can anybody gibe me a hint what is is about ? Greetings, Martin

hehe.. This is OT too but I'm just wondering... "intelligent auto responder" Can you name me a few??? I'm curious.. Cheers, Mun Heng, Ow H/M Engineering Western Digital M'sia DID : 03-7870 5168 -----Original Message----- From: Jason Balicki [mailto:kodak@frontierhomemortgage.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:45 AM To: 'Darrik Spaude' Cc:

diff -u -r1.44 cmd-list.c --- src/imap/cmd-list.c 5 Feb 2005 18:07:26 -0000 1.44 +++ src/imap/cmd-list.c 15 Mar 2005 16:15:27 -0000 @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ ctx->inbox && cur_ref == ctx->ref, ns->sep); if (*cur_ref != '\0' || *cur_prefix == '\0') - match = IMAP_MATCH_CHILDREN; + match =

Hi, My configuration: Sipura 2000 Debian/Sarge Asterisk 1.0.1 built by msp@toshiba on a i686 running Linux I am calling 612@fwd.pulver.com which is Daytimephoneline of pulver.com and for the first second the connection seems to be ok and I hear: <thu .. rsda ..> and nothing more, which suppose to mean <Thursday, ...>. The echo line from 613@fwd.pulver.com does work the same. I never

RFC 2060 section 7.2.2 and 7.2.3 says the "The LIST response occurs as a result of a LIST command." and "The LSUB response occurs as a result of an LSUB command." Dovecot presently returns the LIST response for the LSUB command. -- Geo Carncross <geocar at internetconnection.net> Internet Connection

I'm trying this: default_mail_env = maildir:%h/.maildir:INDEX=%h/.indexes:INBOX=% h/.maildir namespace private { separator = . prefix = INBOX. inbox = no } namespace private { separator = . prefix = inbox = yes hidden = yes } but dovecot doesn't appear to be honoring "hidden" - am I missing something? (that is, all my

Checkin 1.37 of src/lib-storage/mail-storage.c added a parameter to mailbox_open() but this broke building src/deliver/deliver.c as revision 1.2 doesn't use the new parameter. It looks like save_mail() of src/deliver/deliver.c calls mailbox_open() and it looks like it might work fine if it were to use a (struct istream *)0 as the third parameter (instead of the flags) -- but I don't use

I'm getting these over and over again in my dovecot [CVS] logs. I'm using PAM for authentication- something that worked a few weeks ago. Apr 6 15:22:11 [PAM-env] Unknown PAM_ITEM: <XAUTHORITY> Apr 6 15:22:11 [dovecot-auth] PAM pam_putenv: delete non-existent entry; XAUTHORITY dovecot: Apr 06 15:22:16 Warning: Killed with signal 2 dovecot: Apr 06 15:22:16 Error: child 25731 (imap)

Hello! I have a problem using shorewall on an aliased interface. Let me give you a short description of the setup: eth0 uses DHCP and will be assigned a 10.38.0.0/16 address by my ISP; I use a host-route to access their PPTP on 10.0.0.138 with "pptp 10.0.0.138" ppp0 is the Internetconnection then (duh) At the same time I want to connect the box to my LAN using 10.1.0.0/16 or any

Hi List, does somebody know a SIP Provider which offers reseller possibilities? Moritz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040828/bddb5898/attachment.htm

Hello I have a working * server with a TDM card and 4 FXO ports. We have 4 lines now and need to add 2 more lines (and possibly two more later). I'm wondering the best upgrade path for this situation. The simplest I can invision is adding another TDM400 card with 4 FXO ports, and use 2 now and the remaining 2 later. Are there success stories with using 2 TDM cards? Any info will be

Hi, Some weird problem (or I'm too sleepy) happens with a tdm04B revision G (4fxo) Steps: modprobe zaptel modprobe wctdm ztcfg -vv /etc/zaptel.conf fxsls=1-4 # TDM04B defaultzone=us loadzone=us /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf signalling=fxs_ls group=1 context=incoming channel => 1-4 modprobe zaptel and wctdm load fine, however ztcfg -vv shows: 0 channels configured Im using centos 4.4 with

hi, i want to use the function table to build a table not of frequence (number of time the vareable is repeated in a list or a data frame!!) but in function of classes I don t find a clear explnation in  examples of  ?table !!! example x      y        z 1    0       100 5    1       1500 6    1       1200 2    2       500 1    1       3500 5     2     2000 8     5     4500 i want to do a

I am having a problem with a couple servers. They both have a Digium TE110P and a TDM04B card. I have setup the system so the TE110P uses channels 1-31 and the TDM04B 32-35. The problem is that when we reboot the server sometimes the TDM04B is recognized first and the TE110P second so the configuration fails. I do not know why this happens and to solve this I have to do a "service

Hi , I want to use the " * random selection of gateway, per TCP connection?" ,i can do it right now but my if same remote site( ip ) always goto the same gateway,i think that is ip_route_cache problem or something like this how can I do ?? Kuolung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Wallace" <randywallacejr@gmail.com> To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent:

Hi, A week or so ago I wrote about the problems I was having using a Digium TDM04B card in a Dell PowerEdge 750 IU running Fedora Core 1. Digium steadfastly indicates their card won't work in any PowerEdge 650, 700 and 750 series machines "do (sic) to a failure in interrupt handling between the pci bus and the card." My question to the list is: for those of you using a TDM04B