similar to: Sending # and Asterisk Transfer Conflict

Since www.bkw.org seems not to exist anymore (getting response from some hosting provider), does anyone happend to have a copy of app_valetparking.c from www.bkw.org - the one that should work with * stable 1.0.X ? If so please contact me. One that can be downloaded from www.loligo.com dosn't compile with 1.0.X, and SuperValletParking (www.asterlink.com/svp/) seems to be for * HEAD

I'm looking for a solution for call parking in an environment where multiple users are hosted on a single instance of asterisk. The main issue being a way to keep user A from picking up calls parked by user B. I downloaded the supervaletparking code from asterlink which would appear to be a solution, but it doesn't compile on the latest CVS HEAD. I sent an email to the author just in

Hi all, I'm confused, in digium website, it says: TDM2400P: It supports a combination of up to 6 FXS and/or FXO modules for a total of 24 lines. 6 plus 6 is 12, how come it's 24? if I have 24 PSTN lines, i'll be needing 24 FXOs. Pls. elaborate. thanks. Lito -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Nope ! This is the one that tries to include PRE 1.0.X header file <parking.h>. It cannot compile on * 1.0.X (I have tried also to include <features.h> instead of <parking.h> (as far as I know features.h is successor to parking.h), but still without results). Thanks anyway. Nenad > > Try this > >> Since www.bkw.org seems not to exist anymore (getting

From c|net News: "On Monday,Microsoft and nine leading phone manufacturers--Asustek Computer, GN, LG-Nortel, NEC, Plantronics, Plycom, Samsung, Tatung, and Vitelix--announced the public beta program for Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007 and Microsoft Office Communicator 2007." http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9719931-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20 --

We have a server with a TE120 on a partial PRI trunk that several times a day declares the PRI trunk down and stops handling calls until the asterisk is stopped, the zaptel/te120 modules reloaded, and asterisk started. Just before things go down, the log shows the following error: ERROR[9424] chan_zap.c: Write to 28 failed: Unknown error 500 at which point a "show pri spans"

Hi, I've been fussing with this for a while now - and cannot seem to get it to work correctly - or rather as I desire it.. I'm trying to implement a 'find-me' feature in my voicemail. Basically - pressing 1 at the voicemail puts the caller into a queue. The members of the queue are my cell phone and my work DID.. I need the queue to call both numbers at the same time and wait

Hello! In my relentless quest for knowledge, I pose this question: who's got the biggest dialplans, and how big are these monsters? What's the biggest dialplan in use right now? If you feel you are a competitor, let me know how many contexts/extensions/priorities you are dealing with. Maybe the context with the most extensions, the extension with the most priorities would be

Michael Robertson, founder of both MP3.com and Lindows, has launched a new company to supply inexpensive SIP phones ($129 for two) and related services. See today's press release at http://www.sipphone.com/tiki-index.php?page=SIPphone%20Inc My question for the list is who will be the first to report on the compatibility and usability of the SIPphone with Asterisk? The functionality

I'm looking at switching VOIP providers, but want to ensure I move to a company with sufficient capacity. Can any Canadian VOIP users post/email me with feedback on their providers? I'll post the results for all to read...... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi List, I have this running, but after I park a call it will not announce where it is at, it's like you have to call another application just to say where it is parked at. I have tried a second priority option for the same extension with that ValetParkList but it seems once ValetParkCall has been ended it will not process anymore priorities in this extension. Any ideals or help would be

I need to accept an incoming call, make a series of outgoing calls, and once I find someone willing to accept the call, bridge the original incoming call to the outgoing call. Using Dial from an AGI script isn't enough because once the Dial'ed number connects, the call is immediately bridged and I need to ask the called party if they will accept the call. I can see a couple of

I am looking for an ATA that has had very reliable results when passing FAX over IP. I was thinking of testing the Cisco (not Linksys) ATA 186 I1, ATA 186 I2, ATA 188 I1. This is what I'm looking for: FAX -> PTSN -> through Asterisk -> ATA -> Fax Machine. I have QoS from PSTN entry to ATA on the network so I can assure precedence. What has everyone out there been using

I download app_valetparking.c from http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/misc/apps/app_valetparking.c and followed the directions on http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/misc/apps/app_valetparking.README I am using asterisk-1.0.0 any suggestions [root@localhost asterisk]# astxs -install apps/app_valetparking.c gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarat ions -g -Iinclude

An interesting article for those needing ammunition to sell Asterisk within their organisation or to others: "Is open source IP telephony ready for prime time? Yes" by Zenas Hutcheson, St. Paul Venture Capital Network World, 06/07/04 http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2004/0607faceoffyes.html On a related note, they also have an article arguing the contrary position (see link within

Any opinions on the best ATA? For example, if someone was having a problem and I wanted to rule out any ATA glitches or firmware issues, what device could I give them that I could count on to always be a trouble free top performer that just plain works?

I wrote earlier: > Please tell me the obvious mistake I'm making here.... The problem was a lack of sleep. Sorry to have troubled the list. -- George Pajari, netVOICE communications 604 484 VOIP (484 8647 x102) Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.ca www.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca

Is there any way to define call parking parameters for different contexts? For example, if I have a client in context 100 and another client in context 200, can they both define parking positions, say, from 701-710, where 701 in context 100 is different from 701 in context 200? Or even better, can context 100 define parking positions 701-710 and context 200 define parking positions

I am looking for some Linksys and GrandStream ATAs in Canada. I am looking for places that ship from Canada so I don't have to deal with the clearing of customs and tax remittance. Any suggestion? -- Thanks

Greetings, I am trying to get either of the above features to work with *, but can't seem to get it quite right. If anyone has them working, I'd sure appreciate an extract from the relevant config files. Or, maybe I'm tilting at windmills, and * doesn't support them - in which case, the underlying business need is to provide the one incoming call on more than one