similar to: Variable: in Originate via Manager API

I have two questions regarding number portability... 1) If I port a DID over to Voicepulse, can I then move that DID elsewhere somewhere down the road. Or does voicepulse now OWN that DID? 2) Can I take a DID assigned by Voicepulse and transfer it to someone else? If not, why? -jwb

Dear All. I'm very new to CT, but attracted by asterisk. I plan to start learn to build IVR, based on asterisk. Do I need FXO/FXS card to start building simple IVR box ? Can I use OEM X100P - FXO PCI Card ( http://www.digitnetworks.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=28 ) to start build an IVR box ? What is the cheapest FXO PCI card that can use with asterisk to build my first IVR box ?

Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts, I need to know what motherboard works ok for asterisk, I have no problems with the Dual and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used. Now I plan on building a Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading. I looked through the wiki and could not find the recommended P4 board. Does anyone have

On Oct 21, 2011, at 12:15 AM, James Molloy wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Could you describe how this would be done? In the current ARM itineraries > (say C-A9 for example), the superscalar issue stage is modelled as taking 1 > cycle. If it were to take 2 cycles instead, as far as I can tell the hazard > analyser would stall because both FU's would be acquired. > > I would

(sort-of xposted from linux-kernel) Hi, I am wondering how to interpret this error message, which popped up on a 2.4.26 SMP x86 box two days ago: EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck init_special_inode: bogus imode (37316) EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck init_special_inode: bogus imode (37316) EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck The problem is, the error message doesn't

I've been playing with the -g switch to mke2fs, which controls the blocks per group. This switch isn't documented. I've been using it to balance metadata traffic on RAID 0. This seems to work fine in ext2. Will I have any problems with ext3 where the blocks per group is not a power of 2? -jwb

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jim Ballantine <j.ballantine at gmail.com> Date: Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:16 AM Subject: spawning smbd's To: samba at lists.samba.org We are running a Red Hat Linux 6 system with samba 3.6.23 installed, and configured as a stand alone server. A couple of users are either spawning excessive numbers of smbd, or failing to kill them off. A

We are running a Red Hat Linux 6 system with samba 3.6.23 installed, and configured as a stand alone server. A couple of users are either spawning excessive numbers of smbd, or failing to kill them off. A couple of us have spent several days trying to determine the reason, but as of now have not found the reason. The top of the smb.conf is: #======================= Global Settings

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

I'm setting up a new file server and I just can't seem to get the expected performance from ext3. Unfortunately I'm stuck with ext3 due to my use of Lustre. So I'm hoping you dear readers will send me some tips for increasing ext3 performance. The system is using an Areca hardware raid controller with 5 7200RPM SATA disks. The RAID controller has 128MB of cache and the disks

Wow, it takes a really long time to make a 2TB ext2fs. Are there better-than-default options that could be used for a large filesystem? mke2fs 1.34 (25-Jul-2003) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 244203520 inodes, 488382016 blocks 24419100 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 14905 block groups 32768 blocks per group,

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++

why the install is failing. Do in need to rpm -e on all the 2.07 packages??? Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B884C4278 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from

copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd

Ultima Online is currently beta testing a new release which will have a 3d client based on the Kingdom Reborn release. In preparation, I am trying to load Kingdom Reborn to learn the client but it crashes in Wine when it hits the installation wizard. Has anyone worked through any tricks to make this install and run? It crashes almost immediately after unpacking the archive and starting the

I'm using Ubuntu 10.4, and running Nomachine (NX) and Ultima Online via Wine. It seems to run fine except the mouse is so sluggish it is unusable. Is there any way to tune this or am I just expecting too much from the software? This is through a ssh tunnel, via the Internet. Locally it works well.