similar to: Distribution of Linux

Followed the "instructions" on voip-info.org regardinging fedora FC2, making Zaptel seems to work fine, however when I modprobe I get this. It looks like a version mismatch somehow. Ideas? If this ooc, sorry first post here :-) modprobe tor2 WARNING: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.5-1.358smp/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format WARNING: Error inserting zaptel

I'm trying to get zaptel 1.0.2 compiled on FC2 or FC3 and I'm getting compile time errors. Systems include: FC2: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.3_FC2 #1 Mon Nov 15 14:46:43 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FC3: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:13:22 EST 2004 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux /usr/home/bwright/zaptel-1.0.2> make linux26 ... make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6

Hey all, Just a quick question. Are there any known issues using the zaptel drivers on different linux distros? ie: is a 2.4 kernel the only requirement? I ask because I have an X100P i'm still trying to get work properly and I'm thinking there is nothing wrong with the card itself. It's setup correctly as far as I can tell and it used to work when I was using RedHat 8 and

I've got a fresh FC2 install and I'm trying to get the symlinks right according to the /usr/src/zaptel/README.Linux26 instructions. I've created two symlinks: /usr/src/linux-2.6 -> /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358 /lib/modules/linux-2.6 -> /lib/modules/2.6.7-1.494.2.2 When I do a "make linux26", I get a million warnings and errors with the result being: make[2]: ***

Dear Sirs, I'm running an Asterisk 0.9.1 in a Fedora Core 2 box. I installed a X100P card on my box and when i try to load modules i am rejected. When i type modprobe zaptel my Fedora respond : "FATAL: Module zaptel not found." . The same uccurs when i type "modprobe wcfxo" May you help me. Thank you in advance Juanjo

Hi all, Anybody had problems with 'service zaptel start' on Fedora Core 2? Works just fine on RedHat 9. On FC2, after executing 'service zaptel start', the modprobe zaptel line from zaptel init script executes just fine, but the later insmod line that loads the remaining modules one at a time fails. This failure is totally silent, ie no warnings are printed to any

I followed the Wiki instructions to get zaptel to work on Fedora core 2. It looked like everything went perfect including the loading of ztdummy. However, I am having meetme and MOH problems synonymous with ztdummy not loading. Take a look at my lsmod...Any ideas? (I am running stable Asterisk on a DL360 - Dual processor) Module Size Used by snd_pcm_oss 46201 0

On a different note using Fedora Core 3 I get CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.o /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_chan_write': /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1745: warning: ignoring return value of `copy_from_user', declared with attribute warn_unused_result /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `ioctl_load_zone': /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:2392: warning: ignoring return value of

Hello, Could anybody tell me if there is a Linux distribution (or Kernel version) that works better with Asterisk. I am newbie and I don't know if there is a preferred Linux/kernel version for Asterisk. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040904/8798ff25/attachment.htm

Hi All, I decided to have a go at installing Asterisk on FC2 which now runs on Kernel 2.6.. Unfortunately I didn't get very far.. When trying to build zaptel it required me to link /usr/scr/linux-2.6 to the default source dir which is /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-1.358.. I guess thats still the RH infulence.. :) After than I tried again but the page rolls with errors and finally ends with..

I have just upgraded from Asterisk 0.7.2 to 1.0.2 and seem to be having an issue with the zaptel init script.. If I run.. #modprobe zaptel #modprobe wcfxo #modprobe wcfxs .. from a command line it load and appears to be working fine.. If I try and use the init script I get errors about ZT_CHANCONFIG and the modules don't see to laod up.. Anyone got any pointers? I am running Fedora Core

Hello List, I have been beating my head against the wall for a little while now trying to get my TDM400 card to work with Fedora Core 4. Not a great deal of success even after successful builds of zaptel and the other required componentry. The machine doesn't even recognize the card. Using Debian it was recognised but as a newbie to Asterisk most of the documentation I can find and

Hello all, Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the latest Kernel release (2.4.20-28.7). As the RPMS mature and people submit comments, changes, updates and patches, I will

Hey list, I'm having some problems with a few of my Fedora Core 2 boxes. 1 of the systems is set up as a Samba Server as the main fileserver. I have some Windows XP machines connecting to it just fine, nice and fast. However, I also have some FC2 systems that connect to it using the smbfs filesystem, and while they work initially after booting up, any amount of browsing through Nautilus or

I wouldn't normally post this to the asterisk mailing list but I'm really stuck... I've been trying to get meetme working on and off for a few months now but I always hit a brick wall when trying to compile. I keep seeing this... make linux26 cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -DZAPTEL_CONFIG=\"/etc/zaptel.conf\" -c -o gendigits.o

Hello again! Just wondering if any one else has had a problem with stop and starting asterisk?!? If I do it say 5/6times without restarting the computer then it crashes. This doesn't seem normal to me, could this be because I'm running fedora core 2? I know there's problems with using fedora to do with the zaptel stuff but I've got them working. If u have had this problem and been

Hi my question is: which is the best distribution to work with asterisk? thanks mark

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Agreed. But note that the standards are set long before that... ??? By "standard" what do you mean. ??? Linux's history has been notorious for variance from ANSI, NIST, POSIX and GNU standards. Yes, far less than Microsoft and even some UNIX vendors, but there are still major issues today with this. When developers try

>There is no real answer to your question. >just use one you're most familiar with. Second that, using FC2 for me, and it's the Devil You Know, right? I have a good handle on the RedHat Way which the Debian guys say is stupid, but it's not, it's just different. All of the little RedHat-y things you get used to and when you use a different distro, it's like, WTF?? I like

Dear R users I m planning to move to Linux to use R (currently under Win XPPro on a 32bit PC with 4 Go RAM), I have 2 questions: - is there a recommended "version/distribution" of Linux to run?R and Bioconductor packages: Fedora ? Ubuntu ? Suse ? Debian ? - Regarding Fedora, I see that now it is version 8 available on the web, but on R website I can only see R Fedora 7 version (no F8);