similar to: Problems with PPP internet T1

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

When I start * I get 6 mpg123 processes start as well. Is this normal? Often after a couple of days these mpg123 processes start to consume cpu and I have to kill them off. I do not have a sound card in the server and I have noload => chan_oss.so Simon

Hello All, Just looking some comments from gurus about this proprietary systems and phones: Inter-Tel Eclipse2 Model name: IP PhonePlus I did not find anything useful or reasonable about their products on their website or even in Internet.... except sales. -- Thanks and regards, Vasyl Rublyov

All, I'm having a heck of a time getting hdlc to work on kernel 2.6.11.9 .. I compiled hdlc, hdlc_gen, hdlc_cisco, hdlc_raw, into the kernel (note into, and not 'modules'). System comes up, I configured zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-24 modprobe wct4xxp ztcfg sethdlc hdlc0 cisco ifconfig hdlc0 up All of this works fine, believe it or not. I have a T1 cross plugged

Hello all, My set up is a fractionated t1, with 1-6 voice channels, 21-24 data channels. I have a t100P installed in a amd 1500 with 512meg. Question: In order to set up the data channels, is the following correct? 1) compile new kernel with generic hdlc support 2) compile hdlc from hq.pm.waw.pl/hdlc 3) uncomment KFLAGS+=DConfig_ZAPATA_NET in zaptel makefile 4) compile zaptel, 5 compile rest

Hello All, I am battling a problem I don't know how to fix... Here is the scenario: Fractionated T1 with 1-6 channels voice, 21-24 channels data. Comes into a box with Digium T100P, splits off data channes with HDLC, to devicec pvc0, This works fine, but I have a routing problem getting to my machines! Here is the current set up... sethdlc hdlc0 fr lmi ansi sethdlc hdlc0 create 44

Hello, After reading the excellent HOWTO I got traffic shaping working nicely over ethernet devices on a test setup. I can''t put this setup live though, because our main firewall has three 2mbit hdlc interfaces instead of a single device. We are using multipath routing using iproute2 nexthop at the moment, and that works fine for firewalling. But now I have a need for shaping and

Hello, I am experiencing what may be a unique problem with operating the bridge. My hardware is custom Freescale MPC875 processor based with one ethernet (eth0) and one hdlc (hdlc0) WAN port and I am connecting two of these boards together using the WAN ports over a long distance - essentially two bridges in series. They are running Linux 2.6.15 with bridging enabled in the kernel

Hey gang, I was successful in recompiling my 2.4.20 kernel to support HDLC. I was successful in hooking up our T1 line into the zap card. I was successful in being able to ping equipment on the other end of the T1. I was unsuccessful in pinging the outside world from the other end of the T1. I've attached a cheezy image of the network. Here is the routing table: [root@asterisk root]# route

hi: my box use eth0 connect my pc. but I type command "./brctl showmacs br0", no mac addr display and the" brctl showmacs program" not exit,always exec # ./brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000123456789 no eth0 hdlc0 # ./brctl showmacs br0

I'm having problems with the voicemail prompts. The beginning of each prompt is garbled. Prompts "edian mail" and "assword" can be recognized, but when it starts on the short phrases it is completely garbled. It is almost like the subsequent phrase starts before the current phrase finishes. I have isolated the LAN to the * box and the phones, so LAN congestion is

Hello! I want to use TE121 for E1 data link to cisco. Really only for tests now. So I wrote: span = 1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 #span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-31:hdlc0 may be first line is wrong, problem is somewhere else anyway. Just because I get: # dahdi_cfg DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Function not implemented (38) This is centos 6.4 box with dahdi 2.7.0.1. Could you tell me is it

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

There are two Linux routers, a 64K leased line is used to connect these two machines. Now, we would like to run Voice over IP between two machines. We have to run QoS and tag voice packet''s TOS field, otherwise, the voice quality is terrible if we transfer file and make voice call at the same time. I am not familiar with tc in Linux. But I have copied a script from LARTC archives. If

I got it figured out now. In case anyone else comes across it - this is what I had to do: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 up ***NO IP INFO SET*** Sethdlc hdlc0 create <dlci number> Ifconfig pvc0 <local ip> pointopoint <remote ip> up Then set your default gateway to the <remote ip> listed in pvc0. That's about it!! Hope it helps! -----Original

dev seems to be slow to respond, so maybe someone here has accomplished this... I''m trying to bridge an hdlc0 interface to a guest, but I believe the network-scripts only support eth* devices. Any clue on how to get my hdlc0 p-t-p link interface bridged? Any tap suggestions/syntax? Simply adding hdlc0 with brctl is incorrect syntax. Thanks in advance. -Cody Tubbs Systems Analyst

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

Hello everyone, We have recently turned up a new T1 from McLeod (Midwestern CLEC). It is configured like so: /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=us defaultzone=us span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs ;(also tried 1,1,0,esf,b8zs) bchan=13-23 nethdlc=1-12 dchan=24 /etc/zapata.conf: switchtype=national context=pri-in signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel => 13-23 I can get hdlc0 (and pvc0) up just fine after the

Hi all, I have two identical linux boxes (A e B), each one with two interfaces: an ethernet (eth0 with ip 192.168.1.50) and an hdlc (hdlc0). The two boxes are only connected via a link through their hdlc interfaces. Because they have to be exactly the same, if I have to assign an ip address to hdlc0 of A then the hdlc0 of B should have the same ip address. Each one should have a default