similar to: Samba Update

I found this article about Microsoft SFU being built into the new Windows 2003 Server R2 very interesting. http://news.com.com/Microsoft+makes+Unix+changes/2100-1016_3-5845790.html?tag=cd.top What does this signify? Is Windows ready to really co-exist with Unix / Linux ... or are they going to try and provide similar functionality because they recognize it is better technology moving forward?

Dear all, I am using Win2003 with SFU 3.5 (not R2) as domain controller. I enabled the UNIX attributes of several users and groups. I use idmap = ad to connect to my Win2003 box and setup the winbind / nss accordingly. wbinfo -u / -g work fine, getent passwd / group works fine, chown works fine, id <username> works fine. But when I tries to use ls or groups <username>, it returns the

Hi, recently Ive installed Windows 2008 x64 HVM domain on Xen 4.0. On xen wiki is info: Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers, included in XCP (Xen Cloud Platform). Xen Cloud Platform: So I installed them on Windows 2008 x64 domain and its not able to boot anymore: File: \windows\system32\Drivers\xevtchn.sys Status: 0xc0000428 Info: Windows cannot verify the digital

Hi, recently Ive installed Windows 2008 x64 HVM domain on Xen 4.0. On xen wiki is info: Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers, included in XCP (Xen Cloud Platform). Xen Cloud Platform: So I installed them on Windows 2008 x64 domain and its not able to boot anymore: File: \windows\system32\Drivers\xevtchn.sys Status: 0xc0000428 Info: Windows cannot verify the digital

----- Original Message ----- | Not tried automount with Centos 7 nor with selinux. | | With that said autofs relies on nfs mounting to work, so have you | started there by attempting to manually mount /home? | | Another place to look is at the hostname. I've had problems where auto | mount doesn't like the short name and insists on using a FQDN, to get | around that you could try using

Good day! I have AD on Win2003 Server with Services For UNIX 3.5. When I try to set idmap backend = ad and type # id <domain_user_name> I get in log.winbindd-idmap following: [2007/11/07 18:09:18, 1] nsswitch/idmap_ad.c:idmap_ad_sids_to_unixids(613) Could not get unix ID AD user has SFU UID 20000000. wbinfo -u prints correct lists of domain users, and when using idmap bakend = tdb

Hi, how do I tell winbind to use "UserId" from AD, and not doing own mapping of ID's ? AD is win2003 R2 Std with sfu. What I did/tried: current (this did not work): # winbind separator = \ winbind use default domain = Yes winbind nested groups = Yes # winbind cache time = 600 template shell = /bin/bash # template homedir = /home/%D/%U

Hi all, its a real nightmare for me. Although i have read and searched the web for two weeks i can`t get shorewall to work. problem is that we have only one server that acts as fileserver (samba, nis, nfs) and router/firewall for the lan. the server has two interfaces eth0 = lan and eth1 = internet. The only what we need is full access from the lan to the firewall and restricted access

I've been copying old passwd/shadow/group files from system to system for ages across different distributions/updates and would like to get them back in sync with each other so the system tools will work. Now they hang like: #userdel irose hangs forever, syslog says: Jul 12 11:19:32 newftp userdel[30335]: delete user `irose' Jul 12 11:19:32 newftp userdel[30335]: delete `irose'

Has anyone gotten this to work? Im studing for my rhce and was trying to get this to work and its just not working like it shows in the book im going by. So basically I have two centos 7 servers running under kvm.. One is the nfs server, one is the nfs client.. I have been mounting up other NFS shares on the client and they work fine.. The automounter also seems to mount direct mounts fine as

Thank you for the advice to update! Problem is that i get the following error message: Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-3.3 - Addons Server: CentOS-3.3 - Base Server: CentOS-3.3 - Extras retrygrab() failed for: http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/3.5/extras/i386/headers/header.info Executing failover method failover: out of servers to try Error getting file

OK guys and gals ... can we please stop all the fighting? When technical questions are asked, they should be answered. I lot of people on this list have something that a lot of newbies need ... experience. So answering a question with "RTFM" or "JFGI" is not going to impart any of your experience ... which is one of the things they need and want. Also ... if someone attacks

----- Original Message ----- | | [root at server2 home]# mount server1:/home/jason /home/jason | [root at server2 home]# | [root at server2 home]# ls /home/jason/ | Desktop Documents Downloads Music mylogfile.txt Pictures Public | Templates Videos | [root at server2 home]# df -h /home/jason/ | Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on | server1:/home/jason 297M 19M 278M 7%

We recently bought a 32-bit Xeon system with a 12-port 3Ware RAID card and a dozen 500GB drives. We wanted to create 4TB drive arrays; however, we soon discovered that there is about a 2.2TB drive array size limit on 32-bit hardware. Does that sound correct? Would replacing the 32-bit mobo/cpu with a 64-bit mobo/cpu allow us to use drive arrays larger than 2.2TB? Thanks.

I am *still* unable to mount shares from a Ubuntu 10.04 server, using a Ubuntu 10.04 laptop. I totally re-formatted both my desktop and my laptop with Ubuntu 10.04 (so that they would be using the same version of Samba). I am using the exact same smb.conf for the 2 machines (less the share definitions, which exist only on the desktop, known as "workhorse"). wbinfo -u, wbinfo -g,

I just had the unpleasant experience of crashing a production server _twice_ when trying to access a file share. The server is 64-bit Windows 2003 on an itanium3. My box is RedHat Linux 8.0 with Samba 3.0.0-2. Here's some messages from syslog: Mar 19 09:13:58 hedron automount[1037]: attempting to mount entry /dborg/POS Mar 19 09:13:58 hedron mount.smbfs[23153]: [2004/03/19 09:13:58, 0]

I'm testing a samba4 server join AD (had 1 win2003 dc) as dc. Version: Samba4 DC: samba 4.1.1 with ubuntu (172.16.3.8) Win2003 DC: Win2003 SP2 (172.16.3.3) AD domain name: dotest.com The samba server had joined to AD as DC. When win2003 dc online, it seems works fine. When I test win2003 dc online, simulate the win2003 DC was failue, found the samba4 DC can't work fine along. The AD

Hi, why is this parameter deprecated ? I have to set this parameter if i want to get my user/group information from Active Directory with SFU AD schemata extension. Is there a new parameter instead of "idmap backend" ??? Buy Andy

I am running Samba 3.5.5 on Solaris 10. This is the latest Sun/Oracle provided build. I have an ldap backend for everything (unix+samba accounts, idmapping for domain trusts.) The Samba server is a PDC for a domain we can call "SAMBA." Each samba account is tied to a unix account. I have a one-way domain trust setup with a Windows 2003 domain which we can call

My AD server is Win2003. And my linux server is ubuntu. Samba version is 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.12 and 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.7. They are join into the Win2003 AD as normal smb servers (not DC). After Win2003 DC autoupdate last week, I can't use smbclient access all samba server with NTLMv2: ~$ smbclient //172.16.3.13/share -U testuser Enter DOMAIN\testuser's password: session setup