similar to: PSTN Call drops randomly - Email found in subject

Dear List members, After succesfully installing the * on a couple of systems, and putting them on test, I observed that there is an intermittent call drop on PSTN line. The systems are - Dell Optiplex P3/500MHz/128MB - Built-in ethernet - 1 X100P (Motorolla chip) card on PCI - 10G HDD etc. - Asterisk April 17 CVS. - 2 Mediatrix FXS ATA (4 phones) - 2 Grandstream phones. - sip.conf, zaptel.comnf

Hello All, I was wondering if somebody could elaborate the change in translation of codecs specifically the amount of time increased in Asterisk 11. For example *Asterisk 11* * **alaw **speex * *gsm **15000 **15000 * *ulaw 9150 15000* * * *Asterisk 1.6.x* * **alaw **speex * *gsm **2 12002 * *ulaw 1 12002* I did recalculate the

Hi list, we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS 2.6.18 asterisk 1.4.36 (Elastix). Both 64bits, no hardware involved, dahdi on both machines for meetme timing. Doing core show translation give on the Lenny server Translation times between formats (in microseconds) for one second of data

I am having problem with Samba 2.x. I am be able to login to Samba without a problem :). When I login to "Shahid" account it directed to "/home/shahid" but I can still can see another user home dir too? why that so like I login as "shahid" account then can see "/home/shahid" but why I can see " /home/test" too - it shouldnt be? Each user

Hi all, 1) My NFS3 clients don't display or obey existing non-POSIX ACLs on files of NFS3-mounted exports. 2) setfacl on the client throws error and fails : # setfacl -m u:stowler:rw testfile.text setfacl: testfile.text: Operation not supported 3) at time of client mount the server's /var/log/messages shows "kernel: svc: unknown version (3)". Any thoughts greatly

Charles S. Antrim wrote: > I am using a card that has an fxo and fxs module. I am no where near an expert but I have my sip phone working through my pstn line and this is my config. /etc/asterisk/sip.conf [general] port = 5060 bindaddr = 192.168.69.1 context = sip disallow = gsm allow = alaw disallow = ulaw nat=disable srvlookup=no localnet=192.168.69.0/255.255.255.0 subscribecontext =

So IMO, if we modify the VF calculation for targets/subtargets using TTI where higher VF is supported The vectorizer’s scope will become wider. Did/do you foresee any issue with this? Thanks, Shahid From: Nadav Rotem [mailto:nrotem at apple.com] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 2:47 AM To: Shahid, Asghar-ahmad Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Vectorization factor limitation in

Dear All, I want to disable call transfers internally.Means agent(4002) does not transfer call to agent(4003) or other extensions. But i want to create two extensions as supervisor who are able to take a internal call.Suppose to agent(4001) able transfer call agent(5001) or agent(5002). Regards Akhilesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Asghar-Ahmed, I saw your last ping - sorry, I'm away on vacation and back on Wednesday. Generally, I'm not sure that having both absd/hadd and sad are compatible with the discussions going on in other threads, for example my thread about min and max. Given that those two intrinsics are fairly trivial to match , I don't see the need to have two different canonical forms. James On

Hi Renato, Thanks for your response. My concern was actually this. For example, take vector type V8i16 on X86 target With llvm.sad() intrinsic: VC1 (Vector Cost) = Cost associated with "PSAD" instruction. W/ llvm.absd() and llvm.hadd() VC2 = Cost associated with "absolute diff" + "horizontal add" ( ??? ) As I will be querying with getIntrinsicCost(ID) for these

Hi, I'm using Asterisk with two Cisco 7960 phones using SIP. I'm seeing the following weird behavior: SIP Phome 1 is extension 4002 SIP Phone 2 is extension 4003 I call 4002 from 4003 and that works fine. I call 4003 from 4002, and it rings locally to 4002, never gets to 4003. I'm able to send a config query packet to 4003 from the asterisk console and get a response, when I send

> For the time being, if you can get away with heuristics, and that fills your > allocated time for this task, that it's the best way forward for now. Sorry that I could not get what exactly you mean with "heuristics". Is it the "intrinsics approach" itself or something else? BTW, now my plan is to just add the two intrinsics for 'absolute difference' and

Steve, Here is the config, I pulled from my server, that works with D'Link Phones: Main Menu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIP.CONF [general] port = 5060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060) ;bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine) bindaddr = 67.109.153.236 disallow=all ;allow=ilbc allow=gsm allow=ulaw

Thanks, Shahid. It is fixed now. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi zhi, > > > > You have to also pass the value type to getDecalaration() API such as > > > > Value* sqrtv = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::x86_sse2_sqrt_pd, > v->getType()); > > > > Regards, > >

Hi Renato, That’s right. I agree with your *pattern vs complexity* thinking. So I would drop llvm.sad() and go ahead with the remaining two. Does it make sense in general? Regards, Shahid > -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 8:40 PM > To: Shahid, Asghar-ahmad > Cc: James Molloy; llvmdev at

Suyog, Thanks for the reply. Do you know if it is possible to add a new intrinsic without actually modifying core code (ISDOpcodes.h is an example of core code)? I'd like to add this intrinsic with as little code change as possible. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:59 PM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rail, > > Below 2 revisions might be of your interest which

Hi Shahid, Thank you so much for your response. You suggested approach is what I am right now using. However, it seems that the overhead is a little bit high because we are introducing two more instructions. I was wondering if there was a cheaper way to do it. Best, Zhi On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Zhi, > >

Hi Shahid. Do you mind providing a concrete example of X86 code where an intrinsic was added (preferrable with filenames and line numbers)? I'm having difficulty tracking down the steps you provided. Any help is appreciated. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Rail, > > > > We had done this for generation

Dear ALL: My scenario lists below: Assume: UA1 with sip id "1011" And dial number to PSTN is "0939749xxx" There is no modification rule at my CISCO. (It will not change any dialed number) UA1 ==> SER ==> UA2 (SIP to SIP) UA1 ==> SER ==> Asterisk ==> CISCO 5300 ==>

On 4 May 2015 at 08:37, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad <Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > My worry is regarding the query for cost calculation for specific SAD > instructions such as ‘psad’ (X86) or ‘usad’ (ARM) in Loop Vectorizer. Hi Shahid, The vectorizer's cost model has the ability to return different costs for the same instruction based on the arguments (scalar/vector,