similar to: Traceroute equivalent

I have a shorewall 2.0.14 running on a single interface machine (nwww in the log below) that is attempting to be well screwed down. The policy file reads:- #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST fw net DROP info net all DROP info # The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST all all

Stephen Clark wrote: > Robert Noland wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 07:48 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> Stephen Clark wrote: >>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>>> you will need to define the setup and question better. >>>> thanks.. cleaning it up a bit more... >>>> >>>>

How do I allow traceroute to reach my server? Pings work fine but traceroute stops at the last hop before my server. If I shut off the firewall it reaches it fine. PING danicar.net (24.222.246.120): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=0 ttl=237 time=104.0 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=237 time=74.9 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=237 time=90.6

I know that there are some patches being worked on to cache realtime users that might ultimately fix this problem, but until then, here is a little script that brings back the MWI when using the excellent mysql realtime architecture with sip: http://www.cheapnet.net/~mike/asterisk/send_mwi.txt This script relies on sipsak utility found at http://sipsak.berlios.de/ Download, rename to

>Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:07:49 -0700 >To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >From: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com> >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / IAX over satellite > >[post re-ordered chronologically] > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com >>[mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman

Hi, I am setting up a firewall on CENTOS 4.4. I have done default block iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP I have enabled ICMP to www.google.com iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp -d 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -s 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT Ping works fine as below [root at firebox rc.d]# ping 64.233.189.104 PING 64.233.189.104 (

Anyone doing this? I'm looking for some example send/expect scripting that I can do on UDP/5060 to ensure that my sip service is running on my boxes. Thanks in advance. Paul

Hi you all guys/girls from this list, I almost never use email lists, but this problem is driving me crazy. I use shorewall for a long time ( since version 1.2.x) but now I use it where I work, and here we now have 4 different ISP for redundance and because it''s cheaper then 1 ISP and a bigger link. 3 of 4 ISP I have no problems, but on the 4th ISP here goes my problem : I have a

Does anyone have some decent Nagios scripts out there that do more than monitor the proc itself? Rather than reinvite the wheel, figured I'd ask. I already saw the one on the wiki. Matt

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.101 metric 425 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel

Hello, Has someone know a good call generator for asterisk including SIP protocol (freeware if possible)? I need to stress a plateform and I don't find any. Thanks by advance.

hi everyone I'm having a bit of a puzzle on one centos system, I have four interfaces: nm-team1 10.5.6.100 em1 192.168.2.17 em2 192.168.2.18 p3p3 172.25.12.222 I do: ping 10.5.6.17 -I em1 PING 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17) from 192.168.2.17 em1: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.5.6.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.367 ms the same for -I em2, for -I em1 and naturally for -I nm-team1 - all good.

What can I do to UNDERSTAND why, periodically, I can't reach www.centos.org (but everyone else can)? Every few months, http://www.centos.org just drops off for me and for me only. It's not the web site, because I can reach it via a proxy (e.g., TOR browser bundle) and other tests show it to be alive (e.g., http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/centos.org or

Hi, how can ip instances be used with vlans ? Is that possible ? I don''t know how to configure this, if I only have one interface (e.g. bge0), and want to assign e.g. bge1000 to a zone. Any cookbooks available ? Thanks Detlef

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got this strange thing: I setup a openvpn link between two openwrts. NetA: 192.168.2.0/24 NetB: 192.168.0.0/24 In netA there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.2.44, with domain name branch.abc.com In netB there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.0.44, with domain name abc.com I setup both DNS server to be a slave server of each other

Hi everybody, Right now, we are blocking pings and traceroutes to our website. But, in order for our members to test the connection when they are experiencing slow browsing, we are thinking about unblocking them... Are there still any security issues (flooding, etc...) in enabling them or is that an old problem fixed a long time ago? Thanks, JD

Hi, I've tried to use SIPSAK to understand the troubles i'm having about sending my voice to the person I've called (extension), after doing this tests below I always got this error "error: this FQDN or IP is not valid: voicegw". This could cause problems (namely audio problems)? Best regards, Helder voicegw:~# sipsak -C empty -a password -s

The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this...

Hi everyone! situation: Asterisk-server A: 192.168.11.6 Asterisk-server B: 192.168.2.44 server B contains a register => username:password@192.168.11.6 But... when I boot it, I get: Registered to '192.168.11.6', who sees us as 10.138.3.2:4569 Why doesn't server A see server B as 192.168.2.44?? All other traffic going over these lines has no problems with this. The

try "sipsak -M -O desktop -B "foo" -s sip:<user>@<registrar> -H <ip of registrar>" the trick is to specify the "-O desktop" parameter + the "-H <ip of registrar>" parameter. Sipsak fakes the host-header of the registrar so that the Snom thinks it is coming from your Asterisk server, then lets the message through to the