similar to: Sun Servers with UltraSparc Processors

Chris, > FYI, I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? > > -Chris We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Pawel Wodnicki > On Oct

Hi, I'm looking at setting up a small production system - predominantly for voice mail and IVR (with a few extensions and hold music MP3's). I've found a couple of IBM X330 servers, with dual 1.13Ghz P3 processors. My question is; is a dual 1.13Ghz P3 server sufficient to run for real-life demands? I come from a Unix/Mac background, so I'm not swayed by the '3Ghz'

Hi Pawel, > We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! > > My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. there are three sparc buildbots which are hooked up to lab.llvm.org. They are currently idle because no builders have been scheduled to use them: # gcc54 36G 0.5 GHz TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) / 1.5 GB RAM / Sun Netra T1 200 /

To improve the performance of scripts that manipulate zfs snapshots and the zfs snapshot service in perticular there needs to be a way to list all the snapshots for a given object and only the snapshots for that object. There are two RFEs filed that cover this: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6352014 : ''zfs list'' should have an option to only present direct

Hi, System: Netra 1405, 4x450Mhz, 4GB RAM and 2x146GB (root pool) and 2x146GB (space pool). snv_98. After a panic the system hangs on boot and manual attempts to mount (at least) one dataset in single user mode, hangs. The Panic: Dec 27 04:42:11 base ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=300021c1a20: Dec 27 04:42:11 base unix: [ID 521688 kern.notice] [AFT1] errID 0x00167f73.1c737868 UE Error(s) Dec 27

Hello I am thinking of buying this card to and wanted to know if this NIC is supported. The card is a Sun Microsystems PCI-X Quad-Port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter QGEXPCI 501-6738-10. Can't find any info on how well the card plays with centos and also proxmox ve (if any of you use that distro ) If things don't seem to work I may bite the bullet and buy an Intel card thanks Rafeal Stewart

Hi, I read in the Asterisk Whitepaper, that you can run two cloned servers, one as a primary, one as a backup, and have them automatically failover to the other unit when it crashes, or when you need to restart it. The primary application of course, would be ensuring calls can be made when frequent updates are being handled, or when an update must be restarted on a busy network. The term

Hi, I know it's not really the place, but if anybody in the UK (or US) is interested, I'm clearing out lots of new Cisco stock... 7970G's (colour LCD), 7960G's, 7940G's, 7920G's (wireless IP phone), 7935's (conference phone) and 3550-24-PWR switches. I also have boxes of 7914's, the single-7914 foot stand and double-7914 foot stand (these are required to

> Tilghman Lesher wrote: >> On Sunday 18 January 2004 12:01, Adthrawn wrote: >> >>> Spell out RAID - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. Bingo. >> >> >> That's "Independent Disks". It's the independence of each spindle >> that >> is valued, not the cost proposition. If one spindle goes, it's not >> all >>

Dear members, I'm not very used with Unix systems, but I got an old Sun/UltraSparc workstation running Solaris 2.5.1 and I tried to install R on it to able able to do some batch R processing while working on my pc. I downloaded and installed following required and recommanded programs before installing R : perl 5.8.0, readline 4.3, gzip 1.3.5, zlib 1.1.4, make 3.80, jpeg 6b, libpng 1.2.4

On Thu, 2015-01-01 at 22:01 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/1/2015 9:41 PM, mechy2k2000 wrote: > > Hello I am thinking of buying this card to and wanted to know if this NIC > > is supported. The card is a Sun Microsystems PCI-X Quad-Port Gigabit > > Ethernet Adapter QGEXPCI 501-6738-10. Can't find any info on how well the > > card plays with centos and also

So, I _finally_ got the time to upgrade from 0.99.14 ... which I told myself I'd upgrade from once 1.0 was released... (yep, I've been _that_ busy :) So I read the Wiki page on 0.99->1.0 transition, and went through the config file - for all of about 5 or 10 minutes. I logged in at 11pm when nobody else should be using it, restarted dovecot with the new version, and logged in.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250 Summary: Attaching to controlling tty is broken on Solaris/UltraSparc Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

I felt like some excitement today[0], and so I ported[1] Andrew's patch for 2.4.10 to 2.4.12 and gave it a try. Everything is solid so far; I did a copy of each of two large kernel trees I have lying around and diffed them, followed by an rm -rf of the copies. Everything stayed smooth and stable. Great work, folks. Here's to a merge with mainline! Regards, Sean. [0] It's

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-05-18

I would also like to help as well. As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of hardware as well. I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.

Hello all, Figured I'd repost this with an edited subject line, to attract attention of people with Debian On Sparc experience. Apologies in advance if this kind of thing is frowned upon :) [AR] hash/hash.o hash/hash_bigkey.o hash/hash_buf.o hash/hash_func.o hash/hash_log2.o hash/hash_page.o hash/ndbm.o btree/bt_close.o btree/bt_conv.o btree/bt_debug.o btree/bt_delete.o btree/bt_get.o

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sun Solaris 8 compile problem. Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:03:36 -0700 From: Jack Matthews <jmatthews@t-graphic.com> To: R-help@lists.R-project.org I am new to the list was wondering if anyone can help me find the reason and remedy for compiling R on an ultrasparc 60 solaris 8 with gcc 3.2.2 in 64 bit mode? Fails in checking for a fortran

Hi, I'm a newbie to the list, but have been screwing around with Asterisk for the last 6 months or so (on a purely experimental basis so far). I'm not a linux expert by any stretch, (I'm a Mac OS X user), so I'm unsure where the line is drawn in terms of Linux issues or Asterisk issues. At present, I have to manually start Asterisk from the command line, but I'd like to

Dear R-HELP, We are compiling R-2.12.1 for 64 bits onto a Sun Sparc machine below: SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Netra-T12 The source was compiled successfully with "gcc version 3.4.6" by using the default configuration and has produced R-2.12.1 in 32 bits. Compiling R-2.12.1 for the 64 bits by configuring the config.site file as follow: CC="gcc -m64"